Discussions of the Model Constitution (4th in a Series): Sharing Sovereignty

Why and How I am a Committed Radical (4th in Series): Sharing Sovereignty
by Frank Wynerth Summers III on Thursday, April 5, 2012 at 9:48pm ·
In order for a complex theory of sovereignty to work there must be a set of protocols for power-sharing. This must be taken in hand from the beginning if a new Constitution is seriously proposed. I am tying each of these discussions to the days in which they are published and so Holy Week, Easter and Passover are among the things on my mind as I write this Note. However, whenever you read this note the discussion should be relevant. This is about sharing power among people in a fuller sense than people are allowed to be people under our current system. In this system some tough and distinctive people are asked and encouraged to interact responsibly to create and govern this complex society.

This Note will be about Section Four of Article One in my Model Constitution. For those who want to see the Model Constitution I propose as a whole you can go to the following linK:

https://franksummers3ba.wordpress.com/major-themes-of-this-blog/new-model-constitution-of-the-united-states-of-america/

In mathematics there must be and there is an order of operations to solve a problem correctly in the algebraic or other system. When you see the problem below it is important to now the value of the numerical symbols but it is not enough. It is important to know the meaning of the operational symbols but it is not enough. It is important to be able to perform those operations with indicated numerical values but it is not enough. All that knowledge and skill which makes up most of what is needed to solve even the largest and most difficult problems cannot solve even such a simple problem as the next one without a good bit of help:
-1 × (-9 – -5) =

Not solvable without one more big component. What is it?
The Order of Operations for Mathematics….

http://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops.htm

If you are asked to simplify something like “4 + 2×3”, the question that naturally arises is “Which way do I do this? Because there are two options!”:
Choice 1: 4 + 2×3 = (4 + 2)×3 = 6×3 = 18
Choice 2: 4 + 2×3 = 4 + (2×3) = 4 + 6 = 10
It seems as though the answer depends on which way you look at the problem. But we can’t have this kind of flexibility in mathematics; math won’t work if you can’t be sure of the answer, or if the exact same problem can calculate to two or more different answers. To eliminate this confusion, we have some rules of precedence, established at least as far back as the 1500s, called the “order of operations”. The “operations” are addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, exponentiation, and grouping; the “order” of these operations states which operations take precedence (are taken care of) before which other operations.
A common technique for remembering the order of operations is the abbreviation “PEMDAS”, which is turned into the phrase “Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally”. It stands for “Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, and Addition and Subtraction”

This Model Constitution deals with something less arbitrary than simple mathematics and more bogged down in differences which cannot be purely catagorized but the players are categories which are filled out by real and individual historic beings. Persons, Jurisdictions, States, the Union and others types are well known in our country’s history. The Civil War or War Between the States was about figuring out how to interact where conflicts of law existed. The solutions we have used have not really worked. We have just used other working parts of our society to make up for the lack of understanding in this area. This countryneeds to rationalize its power and sovereignty relationships and while the new constitution is being put in place is the time to organize these relationships and principles.

In America today we have people who believe that any form real government is obscene. That is a kind of Libertarianism which is indistinguishable from treason for any real society. Also in America we have alarger group of people who are committed to a strong government to despoil some citizens as much as possible and use the funds to distribute entitlements and benefits to themselves and their constitutents. Further, in America today there are many who will always act in the most cowardly way available no matter what it is the political realm. All these trends are growing and are fatal to our society alone or together. This section begins the difficult process of defining how the basic socio-political contract will work under the proposed constitution. If we do not make these changes are some like them then I believe our future is doomed to be horrible even by standards much less demanding than mine.

Before the Civil War the South was populated by a good number of people seeking not to abolish the Republican and democratic and racist elements of the social order but to combine and modify them with other elements in a new arrangement which would create a richer, better and more harmonious society. However, when the confederacy came into being it happened so quickly that little of this search for insight bore fruit in the COnfederate State of America in a real political form. What might have happened if they had achieved independence is hard to say. There were many clubs and associations in the pre-confederate South that celebrated knights and serfs from Europe’s past. There were those who hoped and were trying to find a way to have real manorialism rather than chattle slavery plantations. Like Aristotle, Confucius and the Bible they were devoted to the idea of building a real society that saw people as valuable and relationships as worthy of being institutionalized. It is also true that some of the Southron medievalists saw the elevation of the slave to serfdom as one piece in puzzle that included the colonization of free blacks in a protectorate in Africa, the federation of homelands for native Americans and free coloreds as well as other additions of institutions. They felt that a real America would draw from several continents as well as from the Classical, Medieval and Modern era its laws and policies. It is true that all of this has little meaning according the modern view of America. However, America has changed. American Southrons fought for civilization and what we have now is market savagery. I could write much more about the socialist and royalist policies that distinguished Louisiana. Far from perfect the South was still too good for a world determined to rid itself of all I call goodness in mankind. It was a real society that could deal with the inevitable evolutions of race, class and religion.

Mostly Protestant, the South had some great and influential Catholic institutions. It also had a Jewish Secretary of State named Judah Benjamin. I have said before in these Notes that how Western Civilization views Jesus is a good sign of its health and progress. I see many signs of a beeter religious consensus devloping in the pre-Confederate South. For this and so many other things the South fought and lost. It truly did lose. The poverty, Jim Crow, scientific racism and ideological Anglo-Saxonism of the postwar South were not extensions of the society they sought to preserve. They were madness.

The wall of separation between Church and State as it is now interpreted is really a wall which is one of many walls between reality and thought. That is not unusual. If American society becomes completely and utterly in sane it will not be the first society to do so. However, America has a role to play in saving the world for human sanity — not the only role but a real role. One American constituency that may feel it has most reason to be trepidatious about the coming of a Christian Emperor are the Jews. It is useful to remember that many American institutions associated with strong Christian links of identity were not anti-semitic in any sane analysis of what was possible in the world. The Confederacy where faith was so openly discussed had a Jewish Secretary of State. Antisemitism, which in itself is a very imperfect term is really one of the great blemishes on Chrisitianity. That does not mean there are not intrinsic conflicts between the Jewish faith position which is not explicitly also Christian (and that has always been rare) and the Christian Church. However, the idea that somehow the Holocaust was a ong time ago or that it was within a great tradition in Christianity are both absurd ideas. people slaughter eachother and are slaughtered and those without long status in a state homeland are most likely to be slaughtered and Jews fall into this category and often have in many places and this is a long-standing situation. But the Nazi extermiantion of Jews is the worst and most outlying expression of some very distinct and new horrors. While supported bny many baptized Christians Nazism was clear enough about the difference to be officially Anti-Christian in it policy and Philosophy. First get rid of the Jews and then get rid of Christianity was there clear plan. They knew Jesus was a Jew after all.

Some facts:
1. When Jews converted to Chrisitianity in medieval Europe the King was their godfather and a grreat feast was thrown.
2. Medieval Churches and early renaissance churches in Inquisitorial Spain and elsewhere were built with the sign of the Star of David often included. These churches had a beilief that the extant remains of the House of David were still royalty on Earth and had no trouble sseing how Jesus related to the House of David and struggled in his lifelong postion as regards the House of Herod.
3.For centuries all Christians knew that Jewish rabbis in a hundred cities instructed gentiles in the Septuagint or Greek Old Testament throughout the Hellenic world and Jews were respected intellectuals in much of the pagan Greek world. Those who studied but did not convert were called God-Fearers and it was in the God-fearer network that early Chrisitianity mostly spread. But modern Jews, Protestants and Anglicans reject the Greek version of the Old Testamant and the Greek Orthodox church has been much disabled by Islam and decimated by it and so there is no historic basis of understanding that is true to the origins of the Christian Church except in the tenuous and disturbed fabric of the Roman Catholic Church.
4. Rome has had recent centuries of the Church influence by the very poor heritage of Western Europe and Britain who now often find themselves too good for Rome and lost much of its other constituency to Islam. It is able to conventiently forget that when the Holy Family fled into Egypt they went to a city that was in a cultural and religious state of sophisitication which may be among the greatest ever achieved by mankind. They create a poor, dirty persecuted Jew more and more as Western Europe loses its sense of all that formed the Christian experience.

Jesus was an Earthly Prince — Son of David. He was a Rabbi. He was a Craftsman. The scenes often quoted from or cited in the Scriptures which shows his disciples finding an animal to ride into Jerusalem, the upper room for Passover, a brand new tomb to be buried in privately, dinner parties where he could show up with a large entourage and other things show that Jesus had a sophisticated secret network and not a miracle. His Apostles carried some weapons even in heavily guarded Jerusalem and he had many followers. The later Medieval image once the Crusades had failed to retake most of former Christendom was when the poison and lies really began and the early modern imitation or fascimile of Christ as mostly poor and obscure is just antisemitic and antichristian nonsense. He did suffer poverty, homelessness and pesecution for good causes.He did accept crucifixion. I will not get to all of that now. But the Christian Imperial House proposed in this constitution is well aware of the faults of Christians as well as other religions. And frankly is more likely to be aware of the truth about most religious experiences and groups than all but a few institutions and people which exist today.

That does not mean Jewish, animist, Buddhist, atheist and others do not have the right to be skeptical and vigilant of excessive incursions of Christian preferences under the new constitution. It also does not mean we are glorifying Christendom excessively. In fact this regime is officially a post-Christendom regime. But destroying all identities is tyranny and not diversity. Diversity in all it costly greatness advances under the proposed new constitution.

I am not proposing these programs and changes in favor of the new Jurisdictions and their people and also proposing a privileged position for the White races in the States as an entirely new idea which is coming in because niether the new era nor Jim Crow Segregation has worked. rather there is evidence that my people and forebears and also other Louisianans have been struggling with an agenda much like this which has often been derailed. I cannot get into every aspect of that heritage of struggle but there are some elements of the story I will mention briefly.

First consider how much the following element alone differs from the segregated post-reconstruction South and also the picture most people have of the Confederacy. In Louisiana, the Confederacy began with a military unit that deserves mention. The Louisiana Native Guard A group of Gens Libre de Coleurs who owned slaves and served first under the Confederacy and then under the Union banner. They are the only entire unit known by me to have changed sides during the war. However, the story is complicated and I find them to be largely honorable as human beings in such situations go at any time.

Secondly, the idea of having Traditional Honor Guards and other institutions which tie people in the service of larger unities to their local traditions grows out of somewhere real for me. That place is the Louisiana Militia Tradition Louisiana had a militia under both French and Spanish Colonial rule. It had a special Acadian Militia under Spanish rule as well. It had a militia as the La Nouvelle France Seule et Sans Espoir and again under the Spanish. It had a Militia as the United States Teritory of Orleans and there was another militia in the Republic of West Florida. It had a militia as a US state until seceding and becoming the Republic of Louisiana and then as a State of the United States of America. A couple of times there has been a secondary Home Guard as part of this militia and the militia itself is part of the National Guard. I have several fairly close friends in the National Guard and an uncle who served in it when I was a child. One of my friends in the National guard is an Hollier and I have found Holliers in both the eighteenth and nineteenth century militias of Louisiana.

Thirdly, the idea of the Primacy of the Imperial Tribe comes from a certain place. Understanding the Acadians is difficult and my own view is based on many sources not accessible to most of you but it is possible to become much more informed than many of you may be by consulting sources which have been compiled, edited and narrated by a professional historian who has not asserted things from shadowy sources and who is not involved in a radical poilitcal cause:
Brasseaux here means Carl A. Brasseaux if not otherwise specified. Carl A Brasseaux is the preeminent Acadian historian of my lifetime and of recent centuries certainly. I have great respect for him and we have met and speoken about history. I have read much but not all his work much of which is listed in color below (these are authored, co-authored and edited works). This does not mean he endorses this blog. I have only a Masters degree and have never published a book of history so fall far short of his standards in many ways. He on the other hand is a Brasseaux which is a middle chiefly clan, he is not from Bayou Lafourche or Vermilion Parish and has no close relatives who are recent members of La Maison de Le Roi. He is therefor cut off from most of the insights tha inform me in these dcayed times. There are five other historians who I rely on as much or more than he in technical temrs for my model of recent centuries for our tribe, But none of them do what he does. As with the Queen’s Apology the effort made in this blog is unthinkable without Brasseaux although perhaps like the Queen of the United Kingdom he migjht not be able to endorse or verify its statements.
The Founding of New Acadia: The Beginnings of Acadian Life in Louisiana, 1765-1803
Selected Bibliography of Scholarly Literature on Colonial Louisiana and New France
Acadian to Cajun: Transformation of a People, 1803-1877
The Road to Louisiana: The Saint-domingue Refugees, 1792-1809
Scattered to the Wind: Dispersal And Wandering of the Acadians, 1755-1809
French: Nineteenth Century French Immigration into Louisiana, Volume 1
In Search of Evangeline: Birth and Evolution of the Evangeline Myth
Quest for the Promised Land: Official Correspondence Relating to the First Acadian Migration to Louisiana, 1764-1769
Narrative Paintings: The Collection of Maurice Dedieu/Peintures Narratives

Fourthly, the area about which Brasseaux does not write relates mostly to that area from which the Emperor and EMpress proposed would come. It is a part of the Acadian heritage shrouded in mystery. Nonethless it is not incomprehensible. Maison de Le Roi (also Oikous Megaloikounis Basliei Akradios kai Arkadikoi) meaning more or less the Royal House or House of the King. This is a branch of the Cinque and its predecessor and hoped for successor governments that actually moves. It is with the Basileus on the more public (oddly enough) Noir et Soir side of governance as part of the First Branch. However on the (oddly enough) more sheltered side called Beausoleil et Blanc of governance the royal house shifts over with the other moving branch, the Tout et Rien, to form the Second Branch which it then leads. On this side the Basileus alone is First Branch with minimal assistance by the Basilissa (wife) and the Premiere Prince Herediteur. On this B&B side the Basileus is President and has eight votes voting last, The Basilissa (wife) has seven voting second to last. The Basilissa (mother) presides over the inner table de jure . The Prince Pere presides over the outer table de jure. The Premiere Prince Heriditeur presides over the dais. The Mistress of Ceremonies presides over the rest. If any of these offices is unfilled by situation the Basileus fills Presidencies by appointment. Unless the Conditions to demand a that aParfait exist are met then there is no need to constitute this branch and abbreviated and casual forms may be used. De jure members are all heirs (except the permanent heirs) and their spouses, all children and syblings of the Basileus of any kind whatever. Also de jure members are the Basilissa and her parents and syblings below the rank of Prince. The Basileus also extends membership de jure to any mistresses, concubines or plural wives of the Basileus and any confidant, bodyguard or full time free servant of La Famille de le Roi or any of its members who are not automatic members of a princely Acadian clan or foreign allied royal family. Eligible members are all close constant companions in the domestic sphere or at arms of any of the de jure members as well as any spouses, children, parents or consanguinates to the third degree of the de jure members. Also those not de jure because of competing royal and Princely claims are eligible. Function and role within the House is very unequal and stratified and voting also but there is some honor and some official work available to all members and not available to anyone not a member. This ritual is all more or less in a state of total collapse but it is not without the survival of its elements, The HOUSE does its work in many ways and supports and suggests work done by others. That includes Papal recognition of the Feast of the Assumption as a National Holiday of the Acadians which took decades and was of global significance. The many elements of more known institutions have less known royal counterparts.

Fifthly, in the twenty-first century the Acadians have already had reason to be recognized as people with real if complex relation to other people in the modern world with whom America needs to relate. The best exaple of this is less than one decade old document tying South Louisiana to modern London and the current Monarch. This document is the Queen’s Apology The result of a lawsuit brought by Warren Perrin of the Acadian Center. In many ways this document created the freedom, the burden and the duty of putting forth the Acadian view of America which is vital to this institution. The political metaphorical ball which had been in the British Court for centuries is now in play and it falls to a diminished few to try to resume the game while other sorts of games have meanwhile matured. The Acadians and their royal elements are not so entirely out of touch with the world as some readers might think.

In the end some who read this may find it obscure and others will see that it alludes to many other parts of the Constitution. However, it essential to the transition being proposed.

**** ****** ******* ******* ******** ****

Section Four: Presumptions and Reservations of Sovereignty
Subsection One: Preamble
In the Second Union in theory the Tenth Ammendment reserved all rights to the States and then to the People which were not specified and named as entrusted to the Federal Government. In practice this principle was repeatedly violated for good and ill. This Section is written in the same spirit and in hopes of more effective compliance over time.
Subsection Two: Enumerations
Provision One: Where Sovereign rights are specifed in this Constitution it is nver to be presumed that they can be interpreted to be misplaced.
Provision Two: Where new issues of primacy public ritual and protcol appear it is to be presumed all sovereign rights attach to the Empire and nearest the Emperor unless otherwise specified in this Constitution. Where the questions of immunity are unclear they must be sttled in favor of the Emperor and Empress and against all comers. Where primacy in a battle is concerned the sovereign rights attach to the Emperor’s presence and the unit in which he is fighting. Where Procedure of precedence is unclear among varied times of action it is presumed the Emperor, his House and Tribe are enitled to the most advantageous positions. In his Domestic Zones among his House and Household his absolute quality in general and as regards the Union especially is considered negatively paramount but positively confined.

Provison Three: In issues of domestic regimes, media distributed almost enitrely in their own boundaries or intended to be, laws of real property, racial classification, voting procedure, trial procedure, militia and honor guards, education and insurance where this Constitution is unclear the rights are presumed to be the Sovereign rights of the Jurisdictions. Jurisdictions are presumed to have rights to non interfrence from the Empire and to have some right to positively interfere with others as regards public decorum, the use of languages at public events and of the celebration of religious rituals at public events.

Provision Four: In terms of the administration of the actual transportation and engines of commerce between Jurisdictions and abroad, in terms of foreign diplomacy, the conduct of wars at the strategic level, the creation of federal laws, the settling of disputes between Jurisdictions, laws of Bankruptcy, laws of the Open and High Seas, laws of Space outside established crown ships and colonies, the collection and levying of taxes on citizens for non-domestic and agricultural income up to an amount equal to their Jurisdcitional capacity and duty to be so taxed, the resources in and under the boundary waters of the Federal American Empire of the United States, the wealth and regulation in and of the electromagnetic spectrum, the determination of national Security priorities and the protection of the Constitution as a whole this Union and its federal government under the Emperor or Empress is presumed to hold the Sovereign rights where there is doubt.

Provsion Five: As regards all the rights of citizens outlined in this consstitution they are to be interpreted in a broad but reasonable way and balanced against the rights of other citizens and the Empire and Jurisdiction but the presumption in their exercise will always favor the families, individuals and communities which constitute the people. The principal presumptions that cannot be stated as rights because they must often be violated by many parties are nonetheless the most sacred presumptions of all as regards sovereignty but also the ones from which much must be taken compared to ther presumptions. These are:
1. the presumption of self-determination
2. the presumption of privacy
3. the presumption of domestic integrity
4. the presumption of enjoyment of property
5. the presumption of familial tradition
6. the presumption of self-defense
Where the defense of these basic presumptions is involved the Sovereign Rights of the people are supreme where the Constitution is unclear.in limiting the rights derived from such presumptions. Underlying all of this is the presumed right to life and yet society and the State in general and this Empire especially are organized largely around the institutions of legal homicide.

Provision Six: In the Criminal law it is presumed that Jurisdictional law governs, then one looks for Federal, then Direct Imperial Government Law, then Edicts, Droits and Policies of the Imperial Royal Elements and Persons. However, where the Constitution does assert a right or duty to create a criminal law the order of precedence is precisely reversed as regard legislation, investigation, prosecution, trial and punishment. Following orders crimes may have some overlap but citizens will be immune to double jeopardy where both the nucleus of operating facts and the basic moral offense or the same. However, where lesser offenses can be sorted out from a following Sovereign Claim they may be tried without regard to the resolution of the Higher ranking claim.
***** ***** ***** ***** ****** *******

So if you have the energy to discuss this with friends that would be great. But the basic point here in this Article One: Sovereignty Section Four: “Presumptions and Reservations of Sovereignty ” is that for our system to work there must be an order of operations and a protocol for various actors and players in the system to use to operate. This is not now nor ever has been a democratic republic but rather is a mixed government Constitutional Union of mixed government republics. Under this Model Constitution the society has evolved into an Empire and Union uniting various kinds of polities and with a royal monarchy in an Imperial framework. These presumptions and reservations guide the operations of this new system of shared power and sovereignty.

I have tagged a few FB friends and I will in some or all my notes. Any kind of political radicalism at any time is a risk for those associated with it and so I am keeping the tagging to a minimum and while a great deal of endorsement will be needed to effect these changes there is no indication that someone tagged in a note in this series is actually endorsing the note. As always I am willing to respond to posted comments, chat and private messages.

Discussions of the Model Constitution (3d in Series): Sovereignty & Federalism

Why and How I am a Committed Radical (3d in Series): Federalism and Sovereignty
by Frank Wynerth Summers III on Wednesday, April 4, 2012 at 8:02pm ·
I think government and politics are very important. I think they deserve to command the attention of many of the best talents. I believe liberty is important as well. I do not want liberty to be minimized or forgotten in any changes which I might propose for American politics and government. I think that the central mechanism, accomodation and and doctrine for preserving Liberty in America is Federalism. The biggest shock among many here for many readers must be that this is all in the royalist parlance. I have said eleswehere and repeat here that many of our founders expeected us to trod the path of Rome from Kingdom to Republic to Empire. This Constitution tells how such a thing could be done in pratice.

This Note will be about Section Three of Article One in my Model Constitution. For those who want to see the Model Constitution I propose as a whole you can go to the following linK:

https://franksummers3ba.wordpress.com/major-themes-of-this-blog/new-model-constitution-of-the-united-states-of-america/

Those of you interested in following this discussion can see why federalism is so important.Federalism itself is a very complex subject and there have been and still are many forms of federalism. It is time to recognize that our own problems need a more just and effective set of remedies and that they will be largely federal remedies. The time has come to continue my plod into the dismal revelation of the reasons why I believe that only a particular set of radical changes can save the United States of America from a dark pit which surpasses most others into which great powers have fallen. This comes from someone who admit that he holds to a higher standard than what is accepted by most of the world as relatively respectable and yet I am saying that by the standard of the world as a whole we are in a state of existential crisis. This reminds me of why we have the US Constitution we currently have. According to the document itself: “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” Notice that the constitution applies to the Congress and the people they represent rather than to the whole world and to their posterity. I and my family do in fact descend from these people but even if I did not I have other lines of descent clearly protected. It clearly extends to me and to other descendants of the previous inhabitants of the Louisiana Purchase territories by the language of the Treaty among other means of transmitting those rights. Thus, ” The inhabitants of the ceded territory shall be incorporated in the Union of the United States and admitted as soon as possible according to the principles of the federal Constitution to the enjoyment of all these rights, advantages and immunities of citizens of the United States, and in the mean time they shall be maintained and protected in the free enjoyment of their liberty, property and the Religion which they profess.” These are not the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but specific rights of citizens and in the case of those from the Louisiana Purchase these rights and liberties could differ in degrees as proper in the old meaning of property. We go around today with little consciousness of what lawful liberty entails. I am not saying that no new persons can achieve rights and protections from these documents but the tone has to be one of realism. I am saying that we have fallen for out of the path for which the Constitution was established. I am certainly slipping from a position of critical and protesting misery to something darker and more foreboding in my views about life and society around me.

It will soon be clear to anyone reading this who was not sure that I reject much of the governing ideology of my day. I think we will end up with a Hitlerian reaction, foreign conquest or social collapse if we do not adopt policies comparable to the radical changes I propose. Nonethless, I admit that the changes are radical. I admit that they are far from what is proposed in most respected venues and the cost would be high. But if you work through the entire Model COnstitution you would see tha many efforts are made to limit the sting of disruptions before. It is about taking the nedded treatment to get well. I think we have many serious diseases, but I do not seek gratuitous pain for our soicety. We have a false universalism attaching to this country which is toxic and insidious.

I believe America must start living in reality and that right now it is a crack house in which Obama’s Presidency if the Sacrament of Insanity in the Temple of the Easy Euphoria. Acadians and many others from this region of Louisiana also fought in the Battle of New Orleans which has been diminished in history but was the most crucial battle in securing American autonomy because in it the British were soundly defeated in a large and well-respected force by a group of Americans in the broadest sense who had no support from a European Army or Navy. The long and hard -earned struggle for a precious independent liberty was marked by many of the same families and peoples with a number of new additions who had become part of the growing America. The Louisiana Purchase Treaty among other things assures that French ships will forever receive most favored nation status in ports found in Louisiana Purchase Territories. Distinctions, history and merit are part of the making of American liberty in Law.

Federalism in American life is very much realism. The Dutch-Anglo and Jewish and Italian communities of New York are not just another version of what exists elsewhere. The Quaker and Congressional history of Pennsylvania is not something which can be made to be a mere copy of something else. The Francsican Missions, Indian and Mestixo civilization under Spanish civilization is unique to California. The Mormons built and and are building Utah in a unique way. A national culture is not the culture of our nation. A federal way of being is our way to what we do have as a National culture that is from many one. The death of thought makes it hard to discuss this well. But if one can force oneself to think then it is obvious.

Race has always been a part of a kind of federal and national dialog. The States Rights and Civil Rights conflicts were in that large area of conflict. In order to understand where Race and lead us in discussion we must at least look at Americans who are doing interesting work in understanding race and race relations within our own history in ways that could form a basis for legal and constitutional insight. Here are two people who have some of the wisdom of ancient civilization’s tradition in their modern professional work.

Charles Alan Murray (born 1943) has staked out a place for himself which will be important if the United States of America makes the adjustments it needs and is able to enter a necessary period of constitutional and social readjustment. He would be the scholar able to delineate a new popular framework for an educational and political white supremacist consensus. This is not his intention given his libertarian ideas. Charles Alan Murray is a political scientist, author, columnist, and pundit and is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, DC. He is best known for his controversial book The Bell Curve , co-authored with the late Richard Herrnstein in 1994, which discusses the role of IQ in American society. He first became well-known for his Losing Ground: American Social Policy 1950–1980 in 1984, which discussed the American welfare system. Murray has also written among other things Human Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950 in 2003. He has written for Commentary Magazine, The New Criterion, The Weekly Standard, The Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and The New York Times. Murray has received and honorary doctorate from Universidad Francisco Marroquín.

Henry Louis “Skip” Gates, Jr., (born September 16, 1950) will play an important role in creating a base of Black scholarly discourse if American renegotiates its constitutional positions as it must. He serves as the Alphonse FletcherUniversity Professor at Harvard University, where he is director of the W.E. B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research. HenryLouis “Skip” Gates, Jr. is a scholar, writer, editor, literary critic, educator and public intellectual. He was the first African American to receive the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Fellowship. He has received numerous honorary degrees and awards for his teaching, research, and development of academic institutions to study black culture. In 2002, Gates was selected to give theJefferson Lecture, in recognition of his “distinguished intellectual achievement in the humanities.” The lecture resulted in his 2003 book, The Trials of Phillis Wheatley. As the host of the 2006 and 2008 PBS television miniseries African American Lives, Gates explored the genealogy of prominent African Americans. Gates sits on the boards of many notable arts, cultural, and research institutions. .

Such scholars as these can help to lead us beyond either a fatal complacency or a fall into pseudo-science or caricature. Neither one of them can be presumed to endorse this constitution but their work could be enlightening to those interested in understanding or supporting it. Most of my work has come from consultation and reading confined to American and ancient or classical sources, however I have been influenced both by cursory study of the decent number of federal constitituions in today’s world and systems of modern royalism in varied constituional regimes. In addition, those who know where to look will see throughout a little influence from the current French Constitution, the New Zealand, UK and Canadian Constitutional thinkers and other fixtures of the modern landscape. Nonethless, this is a much more American document than most of the articles on the constitution currenlty being written by scholars in this country.

This constitution explains itself over all of its pages. Each articler deals with something but because there is a list here which will raise many questions about jurisdictions under the new regime I will give a very brief summary of part of the scheme before we get to the text. If it answers any questions you may have good. If you do not understand it don’t worry. The scheme will become clear to anyone reading the whole constituiton or if this series is ever finished it will become clear in reading all these notes.

The theory of this new constitution is that the fifty states alone will have seats in the Senate. The States will be intended to be jurisdictions where those whites we currently sometimes call caucasians and as we use the term white in general will motly be privileged. They shall in general define race and race relations as well as other domestic and sexual matters in the States. While much of this is for later Articles this will be part of other changes:
1. The House of Representatives will be expanded to 800 seats.
2. The Bureau of Land Management will be abolished and most of its lands, all Indian Reservations, many lands in US outside the States and a small donation percentage of lands from each of 48 states will go to make up the states will go to make up new Jurisdictions known as Territories and Possessions for the Benefit of other races of citizens.
3.There will be a small but complicated Direct Imperial Government Jurisdiction which will like the Possessions and Territories be represented in the House but not the Senate. However, the Territories and Possessions will elect Tribunes to monitor the Senate. All AMerican CItizens will have some vote in Congress which many do not now. However States will have more deistrict perpopulation than Teritories after a territory has two. Both States and Territories will have more than Possessions once Possessions have their automatci one seat. Military bases will also be represented in the House and those on such bases will vote in both their jurisdiction and at the lowest ratio of all from their base.
4. Hawaii and Alaska will give large donations to a Territory each and be reduced in size as States and a third of Puerto Rico will become a State just a bit larger than Rhode Island.
5. Each State will have one or two North East Asian Districts and North East Asians will function under special protections of relative racial equality in the States. States with almost no NEA population will have at least a designated NEA Competitive District and State Law will prefer NEA local officials in such Districts. Each State will also have a district for persons of color not related to secial jusrisdiction peoples on its borders, these districts shall have representation in the State Legislature and some municipal rights but not in Congress. The Municipal officials of these colored districts will gather in a convention to elect four members to represent all 51 districts as a united community in the House of Representatives.
6. This language talks a great deal of the Emperor and Empress. However, elsewhere in the constitution it would be be and is made clear that most (not all) executive power in the new Regime is is entrusted to the First Executive Vice President and that he is elected with the Deputy Executive Vice President who remains President of the Senate. Many things are reformed but in large part they operate as the President and Vice President operate and act in our republican system at present.

****** ******* ******** ********* *********
Section Three: Federalism
Subsection One: Theory of Governance in the Third Union
This Empire is more Unitary than the Founders of this Third Union would consider to have been a correct reading of the preceding Constitution and the governance thereby. However it may often be more federal than the governance actually was in recent decades. There is a gradual distinction between the purely Federal and the purely Unitary form of government and this government is still a truly Federal Union. The Union is a federation of Sovereigns bearing the names of States, the Direct Imperial Government, Union, Territories, Possessions. This Constitution is the basic means by which these arrangements and interactions shall be coordinated. The Sovereignty both pro forma and in finis of the Direct Imperial Government rests in the Emperor or the Empress during an interregnum or if neither exist is held in trust by the other sovereigns. In the larger Empire and Union, the Emperor or the Empress during an interregnum embodies the full pro forma Sovereignty as regards all that is alien but internall embodies only the role of the Sovereign One who leads and presides over the Sovereign Few and the Sovereign Many. But the Sovereign Few and the Sovereign Many never have as definite or certain a voice or essence as the Sovereign One often has. The Emperor or the Empress during an interregnum holds the liege lordship and fealty of any jurisdictional royal Sovereign Monarch but is the Supreme Sovereign One of all Republican Jurisdictions inasmuch as the people are citizen-subjects of the Empire and to the degree the Jurisdiction has yielded to or had held back by the Union and Empire any powers or rights. Emperor or the Empress during an interregnum is the Supreme One and King of Louisiana/Roi de la Louisiane in whom full monarchy of the State of Louisiana and the other jurisdictions located entirely in the Minor Compact of Louisiana ultimately exists. This Sovereign also has a unique role in the sovereignty over the Major Compact of the Louisiana purchase and is thus the Royal Sovereign of all the Louisiana. The same person is the Basileus Arkadios or Basilissa Arkadios and sovereign over the Imperial Tribe in an unwritten constitution vastly more complex and sophisticated than this one. The Emperor or the Empress during an interregnum is also the default and presumed absolute despot over the Imperial House where this constitution does not specify that they are not the absolute sovereign then this constituted Union and Empire must presume at least passively and often actively that they are the absolute sovereign in every sense. Where the terms Union and Empire are used in a pairing in this Constitution the Union represents all powers related to that Executive administration which Emperor or the Empress during an interregnum entrust to the First Executive Vice-President and the Empire refers to the bracketing power and reserves within the society where the Executive Administration is essentially reserved by and to the Emperor or the Empress during an interregnum. The context for this central royal sovereign is the context that he is a merit-proved royal Heir of the Imperial Tribe who has been freely and duly elected by representatives of all sovereigns in society, the Few and the Many and the Remembracers of the One. In this election they have been instructed in the roles and selction of Empresses and that in electing this Heir they are also electing the necessary Empress or Empresses before the next Emperor whether full or acting and however they may rightly and lawfully arise. They ought to deny the Heir a throne should they feel unble to give his future Empresses their rights.
Subsection Two: Primacy
The Union and Empire are founded with two Primacies. The Primacy of the Union of States with eachother and the new Jurisdictions is the First. The Union of the Emperor, Imperial House and Imperial Tribes into a federal Empire with the other peoples the American Empire is the Second Primacy.
Subsection Three: The New Jurisdictions
Provision One: Enumeration of Territories:
1.The Territoryof the Federated Aboriginal American Nations of the Northeast
2.The Territoryof the Federated Aboriginal American Nations of the Southeast
3.The Territory of the Federated Aboriginal American Nations of the Southwest
4.The Territory of the Federated Aboriginal American Nations of the Northwest
5.The Territory of the Kingdom of Hawaii
6.The Territory of American Samoa
7.The Territory of Guam
8. The Chamorro and Refaluwasch Federated Territory Of the Northern Marianas Islands
9.The Territory of the Aleut, Inuit and Eskimo Peoples of Alaska
10.The Territory of Creoles of Color of Louisiana
11.The Territory of the Creoles of Color of Puerto Rico
12.The Territoryof the Creoles of Color of the US Virgin Islands
13.The Federated Territory of the Mestizos of the Western Half of Spanish Borderlands
14.The Federated Territory of the Mestizos Eastern Half of the Spanish Borderlands
15. The Small Federal Territory of token Micronesian, Filipino Other Old American Holdings.
Provision Two: Enumeration of the Possessions
Possessions:
1.The Negro and African-American Possession in South Carolina
2.The Negro and African American Possession in Mississippi
3.The Negro and African American Possession in Florida
4.The Negro and African American Possession in Alabama
5.The Negro and African American Possession in Georgia
6.The Negro and African American Possession in Louisiana
7.The Negro and African American Possession in Texas
8.The Negro and African American Possession in Virginia
9.The Negro and African American Possession in Arkansas
10.The Negro and African American Possession in Tennessee
11.The Negro and African American Possession in North Carolina
12.The Negro and African American Possession in the US Virgin Islands
13.The Negro and African American Possession in Puerto Rico
14.The Negro and African American Possession of Federated Districts in Kentucky, Maryland , West Virginia and Oklahoma
15.The Negro and African American Possession of Federated Districts in the North and Central Region
16.The Negro and African American Possession of Federated Districts of the Greater South West and the Pacific States and Territories
Subsection Four:Traditional Honor Guards
Provision One: These rules are developed for the Constitutional Jurisdictions. However, except where specifed otherwise they shall apply to the Traditional Honor Guards of the Major Compacts. Minor Compacts have troops and officers on loan from Jurisdictions.
Provision Two: The Traditional Honor Guards must pay their fulltime personell no less than half the pay of the best paid Militia or National Guard Units with which their government is associated. At least half their personell must be full-time.
Provision Three: They have no loyalty to the Union but only to the Empire and the Jurisdiction as regards their role and function as a military force. Each is an autnonomous force. Republican Jurisdictions are alllowed one each. Royalist Jurisdiction are allowed three. The Guard all share is a Chief Magistrate or Governor’s to command. There can be a Monarch’s Guard and a Female Consort’s Guard which must reduce by half and become a unit in the Monarch’s Guard when a woman is Monarch. Half of all officers must be in some branch of the Five-Fold Nobility other than the Nobility of the Sword. This being a minimum shall also be the required one tenth of all the officers must be Ordinary Nobility. The Emperor shall appoint a member of the Imperial House to be a sponsoring colonel who shall receive one twentieth colonel’s pay and a half wage per diem to serve at his or her discretion when available. Each shall drill in homage to the Emperor at an Imperial Palace of the Emperor’s choice every two years in whole or in part at the Emperor’s discretion.
Provision Four: Each member shall have two set of duties and uniforms. The modern force duties will be limited to to security, military police, riot control and the their relevant support units. The traditional force must be divided into at least two units one of which must be animal mounted, one of which must be before firearms, one of which must closely resemble a defunct unit related to the history of the jurisdiction and all of which must imitate a working unit aptly suited to a specific war at least one hundred years in the past.
Provision Five: The Traditional Honor Guard shall never exceed a tenth of the numbers of all other military units related to the Empire and Union which are in or under the Jurisdiction in any direct or meaningful way.

******* ****** ******** ******** ******** *****
So if you have the energy to discuss this with friends that would be great. But the basic point here in the Section on Federalism which is in Article Two: Sovereignty is that our system is a federal one and always has been. The most important form of federalism has been between the States and in the Dual Sovereignty they share with the Federal Government. While this system was intended to be capable of change the only thing that was held out as not to change was equal representation of States in the Senate. That is preserved in this new Constitution. There other elements to the Federal principle as it exists in our society and this principle has been hinted at in oour treaty relations with Sovereign Indian Nations which also operate in a special relationship with the Federal Government and this is continued in relations to US lands outside the fifty states. All these federal elements are improved and more rationalized and made more just but in a way which is somewhat coslty and difficult as this proposal transforms us to an Empire and Union uniting various kinds of polities which are all entitled to the rights of Jurisdictions. We have reached the time for that phase of development. It is time for a new Constitutional Union to be known principaly as the Federal American Empire of the United States.

I have tagged a few FB friends and I will in some or all my notes. Any kind of political radicalism at any time is a risk for those associated with it and so I am keeping the tagging to a minimum and while a great deal of endorsement will be needed to effect these changes there is no indication that someone tagged in a note in this series is actually endorsing the note. As always I am willing to respond to posted comments, chat and private messages.

Discussions of the Model Constitution (2d in Series): Sovereignty and Government

Why and How I Am a Committed Radical (2d in Series): American Government and Sovereignty
by Frank Wynerth Summers III on Wednesday, April 4, 2012 at 8:50am ·
Is America a democratic republic? If it not was it intended to be one? Then we should ask, regardless of the answer to the first two questions “Should America be a Democratic Republic?” America must understand itself if it is to transform itself in useful and worthwhile ways. To see my Model Constitution in full got to the link below. This is just a guide to a small passage within it:

https://franksummers3ba.wordpress.com/major-themes-of-this-blog/new-model-constitution-of-the-united-states-of-america/

Now let us return to a brief discussion of what kind of Union we ought to have. America has become an advocate with guns and lies and corruption for international regimes configured around an idea of democracy which was not the ideal in the founding of our union of republican states. Nor is this a minor difficulty. Our fundamental inability to understand our government as a society has horrible effects.

Tonight many people will remeber the anniversary of the assassination of Martin Luther King. The only American with their own holiday now is Martin Luther King Junior. He and not even such a figure as Justice Thurgood Marshall has a monument on the Mall and is proof to anyone who counld actuallly think of the fact of Black Supremacist America. This perhaps suits many people because Black American are less prepared to exercise leadership than Confederate Americans, Spanish (White Hispanic) Americans, Cajun Americans, Jewish Americans, Mestizo Americans or other groups. Thus one can opt out of the national mainstream easily in a society where the legal aristocracy and dominant group is one of the poorest in true wealth, least dsiciplined, most criminal and least respectable large populations in the country.

I have been the victim of violent racism against white people in a number of countries anumber of times. When I was not a victim it was sometimes because I prevailed against five or more attacking memebers of the other race at the same time. I have seen the white-murdering negro establishment of the United States in all its racist horror. I invite anyone who can think to compare Bill Clinton’s casuistic and careful white lies about the Lewinski affair with Herman Cain’s bald faced lies about sexual purity. The lines between races are not hard sealed and airtight but there are real differences and our racial policies are destroying us. I do not believe things were alright before the Civil Rights movement but do believe that they are worse now. What would the government do if when the most recent white-hating black murderer and rapist was released on to the street and white mob was on the street demanding redress for the abuse of their civil rights? This country is a moral sewer. But a one-sided racially obssessed regime is almost the last thing this country needs. The typical black organization in America is about as racially hateful and obsessed as the Ku Klux Klan. However, the Klan is criminalized and the many Black identity and African-American identified groups are all fostered and supported by countless laws.

Direct Election of Senators was a terrible constitutional mistake. It undid the fabric of much of our country by keeping the Senate tied to the local knowledge of the State Legislatures. The intention of the Founders was in part to preserve Ferderalism as a great principle we will return to in my next Note in this series it was also to have the legislatures appoint as manyh members as possible of the unofficial aristocracy that exists in Each state whether recognized or not. These were people who might never run themselves. In an era when women are in the Senate I think of my recently deceased grandmother as such a person. Royalist systems have always had some female office holders and republics are usually more misogynistic. Someone like her might have been a Senator and this might have been done with a grateful acknowledgement of a loose kind of privilege she would have richly repayed to Louisiana and the Union. Who knows…

Here are some facts about her one would not find in a typical campaign spot but that a legislature might know.
Beverly Miller Summers was the daughter of Dr. Preston Joseph Miller who moved into Vermilion Parish and Laura Broussard who was a native of Cow Island and tied to old and prominent rural landowning familes. The Broussards also held important positions in Acadian life and culture which cannot be adequately described in this brief note. My grandmother had owned in her life quite few thousands of acres of lands nearby acquired, owned and transferred in quite a varied and complex range of property rights and conveyances. These lands were all in the region traditionaly known as the Terre des Attakapas. This was a land including almost all of Vermilion Parish and most of several neighboring parishes and it is named for Aboriginal American tribe known for small numbers, ferocity and cannibalism who were very diminished in wars with other Aboriginal American nations, the Spanish and the French before the Acadians under Joseph Broussard came to this region. The Prairie where Abbeville and Lafayette sit is the Attakapas country in Acadian and Louisiana parlance. A good number of Atakapas (or Attakapas of Atakkapas) were killed in skirmishes and there wives and children taken as mistresseses and second families by the Acadians. Some of their descendants joined the Houma who also interbred and intermarried heavily with the Acadians. The Attakapas name was so hated by neighbors that only people who are almost pure European White have ever dared to use it since first contact. There are remenants but no tribe. The remnants are spread over a large area.

My grandmother’s mother’s family were descendants of Joseph Broussard, obviously he was also my ancestor. He was a resistance leader in Acadie, Captain of the Attakapas, little understood he stands tall as the founding Basileus of the New Acadia. He held a uniquely high status for a colonist with the British, French and Spanish although he did not have an easy life as a result. Joseph Broussard is known Broussard dit Beausoleil. “Beausoleil” means beautiful sunlight in French among other things. It is also the name of a town in Acadie where several families including the Broussards lived. Part of the identifying handle of Joseph Broussard dit Beausoleil. Beausoleil is also a code name for Basileus which is Greek for King. The original name of Acadie in Canada was Arcadie or in English Arcadia before it was Acadia. While my grandmother was never popularly elected her husband was elected to several posts in the Louisiana judiciary. He rose to his post as Chief Justice based on seniority. But in his day the elections of Judges were more nuanced than today — less democratic in the sense that democracy is bad for the judiciary. She had a full life with him and without him which was relevant to public life in this State and region. My grandmother Beverly Miller Summers and I spent a great deal of time together. We knew each other extraordinarily well and we had quite a few enjoyable times together. We were not really all that much alike in most of the terms by which most people would measure people being alike. We did not have mostly the same vices or virtues. We did not have an infinite trust in one another. Much of what bound us to gether was sharing in work which most people would find odd and esoteric and many would not recognize as legitimately being work. So much time spent is now safely locked in the past sealed with deaths twenty years apart of Chief Justice and Mrs. Frank Wynerth Summers. In her death his death is somehow completed for me. Although Christians recognize death as ending a marriage there is something of the “two become one” which that faith and others cannot help but feel as well. They survive in their descendants but they also end their tenure in my life as the couple is gathered beside one another in death’s rest. Head she served six or twelve years in a US Senate I think the matured ideals of the Founders would have been perfected in that institution. Arguing that it needs to be more democratic misses much (but not all) of its point.

In my Model Constitution I recommend three Seantors for each State with two popularly elected for terms as they are now and one appointed by each State Legislature for a twelve year term. That is not directly the section being discussed in this days note however. We are in the article on Sovereignty, we may get to Article Two on Congress eventually.

****** ******* ******* ******** ************* ********

Article One: Sovereignty
In understanding governance in this union nothing is more imperative and few things are more intrinsically difficult than understanding the concept, function an operation of sovereignty in the Federal American Empire of the United States . Sovereignty in this American Empire is at once much richer and more complicated than in the governing charters and social contracts which bind together most nations and polities
Section One: Mixed Government
The head of state in this Union is the person who most embodies the Sovreignty. That is the Emperor. However, the Sovereignty is held and administered in a complex way. This government is a system in which the elements of Monarchy, Aristocracy and Democracy are all included and subsumed. In recent decades America has become known for Democracy. Most Americans have grown up only praising Democracy. However, Federal government in the United States of America under the Constitution of 1789 was designed to be monarchy established in the President, an aristocracy established in the Senate and the Supreme Court and a democracy established in the House of Representatives. Monarchy, Democracy and Aristocracy are terms intended to be very specific and technical in their meaning.
Section Two: Balanced Style
This government blends elements of the royalist and the republican style of government. Now the post for which I gave the link above states briefly how our Founding Fathers expected America to follow the path from royalist agrarianism to republicanism and into Empire. ”One must remember that this would be a revolution that leaves the vast preponderance of resources in a slightly altered set of institutions that have evolved within a republican structure. This is a very American approach since America’s 200 and more republican years have merged from a relatively slightly modified version of British and Arcadian-Acadian royalist regimes mixed with Iroquois Chieftainly confederated mixed government seen through the lense of Greek Classical political science and the Roman republics emergence from the Kingdom of the City of Rome. In the tradition we now would move like Rome from Republic to Empire. However, the American enterprise has never been a purist enterprise and this is not a purist’s proposal.”
Most of our words related to theories of government have Greek roots and are basically Greek. These include democracy, oligarchy, aristocracy, monarchy, tyranny, politics, police and others. However republic and republicanism are Latin in root and origin despite the prominence of Plato’s account of the Socratic dialog Republic. The real name of the book is Politea which more or less means Politics. However, since English has called Aristotle’s great work Politics it is easier for us to call this earlier book Republic. It is also true that “City-State Politics” might better translate Plato’s title. The very Roman concept of republic had not been invented in Plato’s time but they did get most of its elements from Greece. Greece had conquered colonized and formed much of the cultural environment in Italy in which Rome grew to maturity. That is true although ancient Rome was one of the less Greek parts of that world until they started conquering Greeks of the aging and crumbling Hellenic Empires that also did not exist when Plato wrote or Socrates spoke. Republic is the joining of two Latin words: res and publica and begins as a phrase res publica before being contracted into republica. The phrase means the public thing. There is a difference between a true Hellenic or Greek King and a Norse or Teutonic King in classic times. There is even more of a difference between a true Emperor and such Northern or some far Eastern despots. Christianity which is Hebrew and Greek and Roman as Hitler rightly pointed out brought to the North of Europe the balance that Henry VIII and the Lutheran Princes began to erode. In Christian Europe of the Middle Ages the King might own a great deal but God owned a lot as well through the democratic and aristocratic structures of the Catholic Church. Thus the Public Thing survives and the realm is not merely a possession of the King. It was against this resurgence of a state which is not really public and constitutional that the Americans fought the revolution. While this Constitution does establish a royal monarch it is not largely a rejection of republican values which have formed this country and union. Royalism and Republicanism are terms intended to be very specific and technical in their meaning.

***** ********** *********** ****** *****

So if you have the energy to discuss this with friends that would be great. But the basic point here in the first portions of the article on Sovereignty is that our system is not a democratic republic but a mixed government Constitutional Union of mixed government republics. It was intended to be capable of change to an Empire and Union uniting various kinds of polities and we have reached the time for that phase. It is time for a new Constitutional Union.

I have tagged a few FB friends and I will in some or all my notes. Any kind of political radicalism at any time is a risk for those associated with it and so I am keeping the tagging to a minimum and while a great deal of endorsement will be needed to effect these changes there is no indication that someone tagged in a note in this series is actually endorsing the note. AS always I am willing to respond to posted comments, chat and private messages.

Discussions of the Model Constitution (1st in Series) Preamble

Why and How I am a Committed Radical: Introduction
by Frank Wynerth Summers III on Monday, April 2, 2012 at 8:11am ·
America has adopted a level of moral hypocrisy from what I call modern Europe which did not exist in the ancient or classical civilizations including those which prodiced most our ideas of classicalism and federalism. In many ways it was a moral hypocrisy about governance which drove the War for Independence far more than any single policy or set of policies. This moral hypocrisy came in two forms. First, a piggish usurpation by the establishment not only of more moral values than they deserved and taking them in the wrong ways under their own constitutional concepts. Second, there was smuggness which only a very costly and deadly struggle could end and which if left to other forms of development would simply go on getting worse forever. The Constitution that emerged after decades of struggle was one which foresaw and intended change and development in a set of particualr channels. However, instead of conventions, federal sensibility and growing wisdom we have the modern European moral hypocrisy this country was founded to escape. That is not our only very serious problem but alone it would be enough to justify revolution. This is a note about why the time has come for radical change. Radical change is dangerous for everyone. Therefore it is right to give the reasons for seeking radical change in some detail. Anyone who wishes can always go to the link provided here in order to find in detail the changes that I am proposing:

https://franksummers3ba.wordpress.com/major-themes-of-this-blog/new-model-constitution-of-the-united-states-of-america/

Part of the hypocrisy we have to deal with is that we can sponsor so many revolutions that it is impossible to keep count while denying all of the real, careful and painful genius of our revolutionary tradition. We as a nation need change. We need change not as abunch of leaches from the corrupted projects of Chicago and the affirmative action thuiggery of Harvard Law School would define change but as someone like me would define it after careful consultation and reading. We need to embrace all those currently in our polity who are not willing tomigrate out of as citizens if they are currently citizens and as humans in any case associated with our society but we need to restore our society. It is far too late for me to approach this in a moderate way even as regards radical politics. I do not presume I will succeed and I do not wish to pretend that I can achieve these changes with the support of people I like who like me. If changes along these lines occur they will come to be because people I like who like me have formed collaborative connections with people whom I relate to on the basis of mutual dislike at this time. It is far too late for many paths at which i could have approached this where nobody would have called my struggle Quixotic. I am still not really all that bothered by Cervantes’ satire of the idealist which is only part of Don Quixote. Insignificant as it may be I really think I am better than people more successful than I by countless measures — I really do. I have known people btter than I am in many ways and some of them were richer and more privileged than I and some were of lesser stature in almost every way. I hate a lot of things about my life but they often make me much more angry than ashamed.

However, when I am not stopping to do something that keeps me from blogging and not blogging ablout something else I am going to do a series of notes about this proposed constitution. I am writing this note as a start to what may be the distinct final struggle of my life. America is already a very different place in the eyes of the world than when the son of a white woman and a Kenyan Muslim Afro-Communist who made modern American choices about identity was elected. The President who is America ‘s Folly has already brought us to places we had never anticipated being before. For me life here was close to an absolute hell before Obummer’s election. But since Obummer was elected President of the United States we have lost manned space flight and the AAA credit rating. We have a large set of large street mobs with demands that have little or no Constitutional sensitivity. But we have Obummer. Just having Obummer is the reward we have instead of all we have lost. In this last phase of my life I want to be known as willing to fill a role like that of Obummer. Although some presumptuous idiots who think they know what I am entitled to feel may have found me arrogant and self-congratulating the truth is that I have demeaned myself and condescended (in the correct meaning) almost to the human limits in many cases. But for my country’s sake I am willing to spend time and energy sitting around telling myself how great I am and communicating those values to my friends who are even more modest than I. I am willing to imitate Obummer and many others in American life and to help to create an aspiration to be a pompous braying jackass among those who must lead forward. While I and others who must lead may never master these skills as well as many others in the world. However, perhaps we can combine this new talent with other qualities which will make up for our lack in that one trait.

Having read this so far I will now begin with the Model Constitution:

***** ****** *********** ********* **********

Preamble
In constitutional and solemn agreement we the States and Jurisdictions, Monarch and Nobles, Leaders and Representatives as well as all private citizens constituting this Union and Empire join together the as the Fully Mature and Structured and Organic People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish and secure Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, to present ourselves in this world and to promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. The United States of America has come of age over a period of time. This Constitutional Charter is seen as the Third United States Regime. The First was that constituted under the Articles of Confederation, the Second was constituted under what is here called the Constitution of 1789. This extant Constitution shall be known herein as “the Constitution” but it may also be known as the Constitution of of 20____. This Constitution comes at a time when North America is no longer a country of vast wide open lands which could be carefully developed over milennia. Rather for better and for worse the United States is now among the the most populous countries in the world. It is a Constitution drafted by a country which is very musch encumbered with geopolitical obligations and which must face struggles on every front to bring itself into an orderly condition for long term-survival. This Constitution shall declare the Principles and Functions of the New Regime so that it can Function openly and that friend and foe alike shall understand its Proper operations.. Also the Constitution of 1789 provides that it may be ammended in any way so long as each State shall contiue to have equal representation in the Senate. This Constitution retains equal representation of States in the Senate and so is arguably a continuation of the Constitution of 1789. This Constitution is longer than the Constitution of 1789. That Constitution under which this is written has a bit less than 5,000 words as originally enacted and as it was in 2011 whereas this document is between 70,000 and 80,000 words. Because it’s Constitutional Charter language legally Constitutes a much larger, more complex and diversely challenged Union and Government than that Constitution described. This Constitution, should it be enacted even on a modified basis from this writer’s charter would be based on the work of one man in creating a model. This has been done in many socieites. The term for a person who crerates such a charter is a Lycurgus. Lycurgus was the historic person who created the Constitution of Laecedemon or Sparta.
**** ******************** ************************* ****** ****

So if you have the energy to discuss this with friends that would be great. But the basic point here in the preamble is that our system is about change and conservative holding fast in phases. It is time for a new Constitutional phase.

I have tagged a few FB friends and I will in some or all my notes. Any kind of political radicalism at any time is a risk for those associated with it and so I am keeping the tagging to a minimum and while a great deal of endorsement will be needed to effect these changes there is no indication that someone tagged in a note in this series is actually endorsing the note. As always I am willing to respond to posted comments, chat and private messages.

Recovery, Holy Week and Mourning

I am trying to revover from the death, funeral and burial of my grandmother and move into the phase in my life beyond her being around. I am trying to get ready for Easter. I am trying to wrap up a few varied matters.

Mostly I look at how amazingly horrible almost everything seems as I look back at so much of my life. It is staggering to me. I am not sure what the next step for me is nor how to care. But I am sure the deep sense of horror I feel is growing. It is nearly absolute.

Beverly Miller Summers Obit: A Recopied Facebook Note

Beverly Miller Summers: The Passing of an Extraordinary Person
by Frank Wynerth Summers III on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at 10:17am ·
Beverly Miller Summers was the daughter of Dr. Preston Joseph Miller who moved into Vermilion Parish and Laura Broussard who was a native of Cow Island and tied to old and prominent rural landowning familes. The Broussards also held important positions in Acadian life and culture which cannot be adequately described in this brief note. My grandmother had owned in her life quite few thousands of acres of lands nearby acquired, owned and transferred in quite a varied and complex range of property rights and conveyances. These lands were all in the region traditionaly known as the Terre des Attakapas. This was a lnd named for Aboriginal American tribe known for small numbers, ferocity and cannibalism who were very diminished in wars with other Aboriginal American nations, the Spanish and the French before the Acadians under Joseph Broussard came to this region. The Prairie where Abbeville and Lafayette sit is the Attakapas country in Acadian and Louisiana parlance. A good number of Atakapas (or Attakapas of Atakkapas) were killed inskirmishes and there wives and children taken as mistresseses and second families by the Acadians. Some of their descendants joined the Houma who also interbred and intermarried heavily with the Acadians. The Attakapas name was so hated by neighbors that only people who are almost pure European White have ever dared to use it since first contact. There are remenants but no tribe. The remnants are spread over a large area.

My grandmother’s mother’s family were descendants of Joseph Broussard. my obviously he was also my ancestor, resistance leader in Acadie, Captain of the Attakapas, little understood he stands tall as the founding Basileus of the New Acadia. He held a uniquely high status for a colonist with the British, French and Spanish although he did not have an easy life as a result. Joseph Broussard is known Broussard dit Beausoleil. “Beausoleil” means beautiful sunlight in French among other things. It is also the name of a town in Acadie where several families including the Broussards lived. Part of the identifying handle of Joseph Broussard dit Beausoleil. Beausoleil is also a code name for Basileus. Beausoleil is also the name of a band led by Michael Doucet who is on my Friends list here on Facebook who based on a few comments made over the years some have alleged to be an Acadian royalist although neither he nor his band have assented to this in plain language.

Gammie’s mother died when she was a child and her childhood was dominated by her father. One of the last projects we worked on was when the current Abbeville branch of the Vermilion Parish Library was built on the site of the Palms Hospital and I used her as a source for a large feature on this for a local periodical. This periodical was Bonnes Nouvelles (Vermilion) This is a sort of newspaper formatted cultural magazine published monthly in Abbeville for which I once wrote feature articles and columns for a significant stint. My column was called A Summery of the Local Cultural Scene. After her childhood she began a romance that lasted all his life with my grandfather. This man became Justice Frank Wynerth Summers who was briefly Chief Justice of the Louisiana Supreme Court at the end of his public carreer as a Louisiana jurist, my grandfather was a Louisiana Supreme Court Justice and with the earlier time he was a judge this gave him a judical carreer for a long time. He was a farmer and cattleman and he was involved in many things which I will not mention here. He died just months before I finished my Master of Arts degree at LSU. My grandfather was descended from the Leblancs on his mother’s side. He was descended from Severin Leblanc: A Comite man, a businessman and much of a mystery. Among people who believe in such things he was regarded as the likely or certain first Basileus named Leblanc and was also my ancestor. My grandfather’s brother and his wife also reared the daughter
of Dudley Leblanc. This man was an exceptional entrepreneur, legislator, author and Acadian activist. Dudley is said in some circles to be the last Basileus named Leblanc. He also gave statues of St. Therese to numerous local Catholic churches. He was my cousin. Gammy and Paupau began to date before college.

She attended Louisiana State University with her siter and both became teachers in the public school system. This also set a bit of a family precedent. This is the largest school in the state famous in sports both as Louisiana State University and also LSU. This is the place where I got my Master of Arts degree. I attended as a holder of the Board of Regents Fellowship. It is the largest university in Louisiana, home of the Fighting Tigers or Bayou Bengals and has many claims to excellence. My sister graduated with a perfect academic average after matriculating for only three and a half years while she worked and during which time she was wed and gave birth to her first child. She was admitted as a National Merit Scholar Her husband to be went elsewhere. Just before their marriage Paupau was in New Orleans. He attended Tulane University The largest private (according to US definitions) university in Louisiana. Beverly’s father and uncle who were my great-grandfather and great- great uncle attended Tulane Medical School and graduated there. My grandfather and name sake he attended and graduated from Tulane Law School. He made Moot Court honors and later became the Chief Justice of the Louisiana Supreme Court. Beverly, or Gammie, was active in the Tulane community later on and my father and two of his three younger brothers completed Tulane Law School. I have several cousins with a variety of Tulane degrees. I enrolled at Tulane Law School twice and never graduated. With some exceptions my relationship with the university could be described as more than half-hostile but regretfully so. My grandfather had attended Southwestern Louisiana Institute for undergraduate studies. This is now the University of Louisiana, was the University of Southwestern Louisiana when I graduated. It was and still is the Universite des Acadiens. I was Outstanding Graduate of my class. One of a few universities with a Francophone studies program, there are centers for Louisiana and Acadian studies, programs in wetlands management and eco-tourism and some solid advanced technology programs. I and one brother and one sister graduated from there with Latin honors — I the lowest of these purely academic honors among my siblings. I have another brother who attended there with graduating just below the latin honors. Justice Frank Wynerth Summers and Dudley Leblanc of this note were also alumni. My mother also earned her bachleor’s degree here starting before me and finishing after me.

Gammie was nicknamed Codrie for Cocodrie or crocodile. While Legarte is the correct word for alligator in french here we have often used cocodrie. This was a hurtful name based on the jagged teeth she had as a child. She adopted much gatorlike toughness and agression which lurked between the smooth waters of her manners, good English, hospitailty and learning. Gammie was a very complex person. She led many elite social gtoups in New Orleans, raveled extensively, read voraciously and was engaged in countless projects but really was proud to be of the leisured class. She had ambivalent feelings and opinions about her Acadian, British, Hebrew and French forebears. She was very patriotic and yet could be very critical of America and Americans.

Her children are Frank Wynerth Summers II, Preston Miller Summers, Susan Priscilla Summers, Clay James Summers, the late Willam Charles Summers and Beverly Marie Summers (Mrs. Carl Tasso Smith III) who is known to many as Missi Summers Smith. Her sister is Lottie Lucia Miller Massie and her brother was Preston Joseph Miller Junior. My grandmother, Beverly Miller Summers was exceptionaly old even by today’s standards. While she was younger than my great-grandmother on my mother’s side who was over one hundred years old when she died she was still very old in her mid-nineties. It is impossible to do justice here to all the grandchildren, nieces, nephews and other realtives who will miss her. She and I had largely passed out of each other’s loves before she died although we did not have an acrimonious relationship.

Gammie Dies: A recopied Facebook Status

My paternal grandmother, Beverly Marie Summers formerly Miller, Mrs. Frank Wynerth Summers– Widow of the Late Louisiana Chief Justice Frank Wynerth Summers and native of Abbeville, Louisiana has just died. I am told that my father Frank W. Summer II was holding her hand as she died in the Abbeville General Hospital Emergency Room. She is survived by five of her six children and numerous grandchildren and great grandchildren. I am th oldest granchild. She is also survived by her sister and the descendants of her sister and brother. We had been very close at one time and had drifted apart in recent years. I was blessed to see her yesterday…

Possible Interstellar Travel: A Recopied Facebook Note

Why Little Green Men or Monsters Really May be Coming
by Frank Wynerth Summers III on Thursday, March 22, 2012 at 9:55am ·
Many people have reasons to suspect aliens may invade our solar system which have nothing to do with what we have ever done or aspired to do. However, many others believe that our behavior is the right measure for guessing at what is possible. I think that humans should not plan to sail to other stars for several centuries in manned flights. We should colonize the solar system for the next 500 years. There is a good chance we will not do that. But I want to show, if I can, that our society could already be an interstellar threat to a civilization one thousand years behind us. Although they would probably win in the end as far as our attacking force goes and it would probably serve us right. Here is my design for a human starship today if we were obssessed with interstellar travel as a species.

The Starship we could have built:

The Earth has launched two interstellar spacecrafts in the Voyager program. These will take about 80,000 year to draw near to the first stars besides the sun. Our radio and television signals have already gone past thousands of stars since Marconi’s developed wireless information transmission. Early television is the first significant transmission into space of a great deal of information about our society and that has already past a good number of other stars. Many people have believed that planets were rare no matter what but the Kepler project has been finding about ten planet candidates each day since it has been operating. As we consider the possibility of being invaded by a technological civilization we can ask whether Earth could already have built and launched an armed and colonial starship, and if not when could it do so?

I believe first that the time is not yet ripe for us to sail to the star and secondly that the threat to us is not mostly from a starship launched by a civilization similar to some state in our past. HOWEVER, it is also true that we could already have launched a starship to handle a colonial process, warlike if necessary, around another star. I mean that we could have done it technically and not that our societies could have survived the political strain. It is not safe to suppose our competitors will be as politically fragile as we are. One of the issues one has to deal with in developing this concept of interstellar travel (WHICH IS STILL A BAD IDEA FOR US) is to realize that nuclear explosive devices have the pride of place for moving huge loads from Mars to the Moon, the Moon to Mars and Mars to Earth orbit. They must never be used to lift objects into space. But once an object is out of the largest of the three gravity wells which will form the basis of our civilization we must be able to use nukes to propel them.

The nearest habitable world I know of I believe is known to science as Gliese 528d or something like that. It is about twenty lightyears away which is about one hundred and twenty trillion miles. That is 120,000,000,000,000 miles or a whole bunch of trips back and forth to your cousin Martha’s house. We could greatly transform our future by remaking much of the solar system with the skill, energy and resources we would need to make that trip. However, that is not our point here, the point is whether someone like us could attack us if we were in the position of Gliese 582d. i think they could. The starship we could already have moving forward would be an asteroid powered by a series or nuclear explosives. We have had about eighty thousand (80,000) nukes in our history. Suppose we launched a starship using a total of thirty five thousand (80,000) nukes. What speeds could we achieve?

First, let us follow and alternate timeline for the development of our space programs and civilization. Let us allow that there many points that will be hard to prove but if I get close that should be enough to carry the argument.

1960 — Our search for a suitable asteroid causes us to track and understand an asteroid known as 704 Interamnia. This asteroid was discovered in 1910 is hundreds of kilometers long and has a mass of about 37,000,000,000,000,000,000 kilograms or 81, 600,000,000,000,000,000. The fully loaded Saturn rockets burned afew tons of fuel per second to lift something that does not wegh almost anything compared to our asteroid ship. However, they were pushing through a heavy atmosphere and had to directly oppose a great gravitational force. Our system will consist of boost with power varying from a few tens of tousands of tons of TNT to tens of millions of tons of TNT released in less than a second. This boost will not push the ship through air but through the vaccuum of Space except for one planned collision with water ice. The route will be designed for speed and efficiency and the speed will accumulate as each boost occurs. The ship is already moving at an orbital speed around the Sun and one is adding to that base speed. I still cannot calculate the exact speed but here is the basic concept of the ship over time.

1965– We land a series robot on the asteroid which set up beacons and beging to survey the asteroid.
1967– We begin landing nuclear explosive devices, digging equipment and transmitters shielded fo space on the asteroid. 1970– We land a manned missionto assembled polished craters, bomb launch belts, sighting radar and lasers and begin underground mining and command centers.
1975 — We remove all humans and remotely fire the first nukes which increase the spin and change the orbit of the asteroid and also power enegry sinks we have created by cooling polished craters mirrors and sails.
1980– We land first permanent human crew and learn to improve asteroid and perfect nuclear explosive drive. We set up loading of nukes on to the asteroid at times when the asteroid is nearest Earth we develop gardens and use artificial gravity to farm the walls of caverns we have dug and gimballed garden in capped craters.
1985 — We land thousands of nukes and store them in the caverns we have prepared. We land seed banks and containers of human embryos, ova and sperm. The final starting compliment of about fifty men and women are prepared on Earth. The surface is largely reworked covered also with ultrathin foils that affect its qualities. A series of nukes are exploded to create a fast trajectory to pass near Saturn in such a way that it will pass near Earth. The final crew is landed as the asteroid passes Earth.
1990–The asteroid ship slams through the rings of Saturn with devices gathering the ice and shielding the equipment and settlements and a nuke is used to push it through the rings into a gravity boost trajectory. Thus a great deal of water mass is added while we do not lose any speed. The repair crat lands on the asteroid. The ship is quickly put into optimum order and the interstellar compliment of sixty people is reached.
1992 — 1995 the ship fires a nuclear explosive every fourteen days. This series of 100 nukes is carefully studied.
1996–2000 the ship fires a nuclear explosive every five days.
2001-2012 the ship fires a nuclear explosion every three days. I stop here on the timeline because this is then end of the past.

That ship would have added speed with each blast and would not lose any speed. The nukes would have been made bigger and more controllable than our 85,000 or so historic nukes have been. They would be boost nukes. The acceleration to be survived would not vary so much and would not increase as the speed increased but only as the biggest hydrogen bombs were used. The energy provided by the blast to the cooling systems would power the ship in the darkeness of interstellar space. Now the ship would be underway and would fire anuclear device only when its energy resources were running low and each time would add to its speed. The ship need never reach escape velocity to get to the other star because it is supplied with numerous boosts. However, while I will be cowardly and lazy enough to hide my guess-timations and doubtlessly flawed math I believe that this crude starship will achieve an average speed of about a million miles an hour as it travels to Gliese 582d. Let us pretend that this will work out as though the ship was traveling at the speed the whole way instead of starting much slower and going much faster at the end. That means the ship could zip over to Gliese 528d in a mere 1,500 years unless I messed up on my calculator let us say it makes 15,000 years. That tenfold difference is called an order of magnitude and is the range used for very far out calculations. If the ship is designed right it should arrive as a tiny working world with a thousand or so people and a few nukes left no matter what year it arrives. The results are more likely to be good if it it is 1,500 years but not impossible at 15,000 years.

My point is that just because we cannot even summon up the interest to mine the moon does not mean our neighbors will not invade us. We just don’t know. We cannot know. That is a real reason to colonize the Moon and Mars. To be prepared for company to the degree possible.

I beg you to believe the two contradictory ideas that I am serious and I am not serious. I seriously believe somebody else may have done this and may be on their way here. I do not seiously believe we could have done it ourselves.

Back in the days of the old Facebook I would have had more elegant ways to share this than tagging those of you I have tagged but as we move backwards so must I…

MIRROR BOWL technology for nuke boost: rmember there is no convecting curving atmosphere. It is a hard problem but a simple one.
MIRROR BOWL on the aft or stern of a ship with WHIRLIGIG. This ship will use a complex system of spin and rleative dimensional exchange to spread the fatal acceleration of a boost over enough time so that the acceleration will be distributed over along enough period so that fatal gravitational forces are never achieved…
Oversimplified crude sketch of the process of launching asteroid starships according to this model…
Like · · Unfollow Post · Share · Delete

Dan Sutton Interesting… the nukes thing is definitely one way to do it — you’d have to be pretty careful with the inhabitants of the asteroid, though: it could get quite hot in there if you weren’t careful. That’s a lot of irradiation…

I choose …See More
Yesterday at 1:03pm · Like

Dan Sutton Maybe it’s just a question of learning to perceive it. Got any acid, anyone?
Yesterday at 1:04pm · Like · 1
Frank Wynerth Summers III In terms of using a smaller ship I have designed two devices to make a nuclear explosive propulsion possible. They both involve being careful. They would involve more and less difficulty for the asteroid ship. But I will attempt to edit the document and attach these crude drawings as of now. See how that goes.
Yesterday at 2:03pm · Like
Frank Wynerth Summers III ‎@Dan as with the Gun and Driver club and unlike the elevator group I am all for knocking inter-dimensional planners and would join you in doing so, but I do believe in exotic physics as well . By the way, I will tag you in one of a series …See More
Yesterday at 2:15pm · Like

Dan Sutton ‎”They both involve being careful” — I love it! The mirror idea is definitely required; I wonder how big those shocks would have to be… we’re talking about devices which can obliterate a city… These are very cool ideas.
23 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Dan Sutton The most interesting observation in the other note is #11: I believe there’s a link between the “special matter” concept and the exotic dimensions I mentioned above. I must think further!
23 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Jim Davidson My father designed a nuclear propulsion system about 60 years ago. I have the detailed design drawings. Meh. War in outer space will only happen when it profits the war mongers.
19 hours ago · Unlike · 2
Frank Wynerth Summers III That is pretty cool. I imagine quite a few workable systems can be made to function in space…
19 hours ago · Like

A video from my life and family

A Sort of Manifesto: Recopied from Two Facebook Notes

Moving to a D Minus World Part One of Two.
by Frank Wynerth Summers III on Tuesday, March 13, 2012 at 11:36am ·
I want to write about a large political vision. My Facebook notes and other writing I do is usually a sort of blend of writing about some large theme and writing about my personal life. There is very little talk at this moment about a huge political vision or movement based in America. America does spread lots of political ideas and has spread others and it is an heir to a variety of ideas generated here and those both born here and either truly inherited or simply borrowed from elsewhere. In some countries Rooseveltism is actually studied as a philosophy of political position. My own perspective is distinct than that of many other people vecause I regard the world I live in as largely and endless and infintiely vile horror movie which manages to combine intense stupidity, moral depravity and almost every other horrible quality at a high level at the same time. I am not yet in prison or condemned to death or in a mental hospital but I accept that any of these things could happen. That they have not makes me feel a little lucky but does not make me feel that my dismal view of things is wrong.

Today and on other days I have spent a bit of time editing one of my videos to post and it records the images of some parts of the life I am living today. There are many pleasant enough images. Making these videos reminds me that whatever I am and am not trying to accomplish my life is not all about rushing around and striving after great goals. In my life I do many other things and observe countless small events which seem sometimes to be very important. I even believe in living a life. I think of the importance of the human lives people live in a much more serious way some people who have aspired to make great changes.

There are many things I am and many things I am not. I do not have a really workable life in a number of ways and yet I am engaged in doing things. Many of these things are in some sense political. I am a sort of political activist. Not a real full-time committed on who does only political things but a different kind with a different kind of radical commitment. My slogan if I were to lead mass rallies ofr a world-wide movement might have to be trans;ated to other countries with different systems for evaluating students. My slogan instead of “the Fuhrer is the New Siegfried”, or “Liberty, Fraternity and Equality”, or “God Wills It”. or “Workers of the World Unite” my motto might be different. I might say “Join Me and Build A D Minus World for Your Children”. Perhaps it could be boosted with posters saying ” The Leader Has a Plan That Won’t Be All Bad!” I like to imagine millions roaring their fanatical support for these slogans back to me.

What if we taught the life of George Washington had always been taught as the life of a man who lost more battles than he won. What if we had taught that he liked and mixed with Black people too much to please the real White racists which have abounded in the world since before the time he lived and on into each time since but that he was an ardent and committed White supremacist. Supposewe had always taught that he would have killed and dies for Vriginia’s right to hold and institutionalize slavery but spent a good amount of time and money trying to fee his own slave and even considering ways to abolish slavery. Suppose he had more than an eye for the ladies and yet was in many ways a devoted husband to the point of self-sacrifice. What if he was an Anglican who sometimes leaned to Roman Catholicism and sometimes to true Protestantism while at the same time being deeply involved in Masonic Deism. What if he was ofgen nearly a poor man and a victim of a deprived childhood who was connected to weatlhy families, had numerous good jobs, made good investments, and was determined to acquire a fortune. What if this same money motivated man sacrificed and contributed from his fortune to pay the expenses of many aspects of a struggling patriot cause. What if he helped start what America calls the French and Indian War which really was a world war when that was far above his paygrade and the event combines in small ways a combination of courage, basic military competence, skill, disorganization, daring, miscalculation and impetuousity . What kind of “Father of Our Country” would such an unsual figure have been?

What if he was tall and wore a fine military unifrom in Congress and campaigned for commander in chief but did it with a great deal of modesty, propriety understated grace? What if he had a love affair with a woman aon the low edge of the British aristocracy, won the Revolutionary War in large part because of the following factors:
1. The suppport of the French King and Court which were deeply anti-democratic.
2. The friendship of the Marquis de Lafayette who was a very elegant and wealthy mix of royalist, aristocratic, democratic and republican principles and ideas.
3. The training provided by a German social climbing General Von Steuben who took many aristocratic claims and titles of the shadiest and most unlikely provenance.
4. He inspired countless foot soldiers who were committed to fairly radical democratic ideal inspired by Paine, Henry and others to fight with many foot soldiers who hated radical democracy more than anything else.
5. He was a very provincial man who could deal with Acadian, American Indian, Spanish and even more mysterious forces that were able and willing to support his cause for a bit of influence or mutual advantage.
6. He inspired the Officer Corps of the Continental regulars to believe that they could be the foundation of a new Republican aristocracy.

The point is not that Washington worked and fought alone or that only he matters. Yet he does matter as we try to understand what the United States is all about. The truth is that in what wa really a bad situation he was a man with a vision and an ideal that was good enough to secure a position for his new country as a solid second or third rate country with a hopeful future. This note is about how to create a world which is very bad out of something worse.

I am not worried about those who may think I have too high an opion of myself the truth is I can list a pretty substantial catalog of my my faults. I also have admired many good qualities abundant in some people which I do not have in great abundance. However, it is also quite possible that if you are a successful person with a high opinion of yourself and we met then I would think myself vastly superior to you and even possible that I would despise you if we met and that this would be unfamiliar to you. It is also possible you might be clever enough to correctly assess what the mixtures of like, disike, respect and contempt make up my feelings and attitudes towards you.

I am proposing twelve interests which I think will affect the entire world for better or for worse and which are essential to making a better world, Each of these areas where we need to improve and can improve is real and is interconnected with each of the other areas of concern. I do not believe a country capable of electing Barack Obama is likely to be able change in these ways — his election is the epitome of a desire for total self-destruction. The same areas apply to other countries but are not addressed primarily to the citizens of those countries. I think America is more likely just going to become a bigger disgrace than ever. Here are Twelve Transitions Americans Can Make From a Failing to Surviving World:

1. Having a Clue Should be Required

One thing that Ameirca cnnot sfford is the level of freedom of expression which it currenly has. Almost anything written as an opinion in a paid for newspaper, hulge liberty in art museums, Free Speech allies, Personal Facebook pages and fictional expression in movies, novel and poetry can be tolerated. However, textbooks, political speeches in mass media, political parties platlforms and other forms of expression must be more accountable.

2. Understanding and Hating Darwinism

Darwin is buried in honor in a church of some note in the United Kingdom. Darwin was a remarkable man who accomplished agreat deal in understanding evolution. He did lay out much of the science but he has been selected as the central figure of the discipline for many reasons that have little to do with scientific evolution.

3. End The Big Delusions

America must assert itself in a more orderly way and assert order upon itself as well. There is no real time left for us to tolerate the unmitigated corrosion of forces not committed to our welfare. We can afford a citizenry that includes many nonwhites exercising many powers if the forces of Black Supremacy are kept down and those of white supremacy are exalted and yet kept in disciplined check as well. The recent instance of a single infantryman of smoe description or other possibly murdering sixteen innocent Afghan civilians is tragic. But the idea that because he shot them fafe to face it is somehow infinitely or almost infinitely worse that innocent people being slauhtered by the car bombs, IEDs, drones, rockets and misplanned airstrikes used by many combatants throughout the world. With large numbers of infantry there is a high probablity that one or two will run amok and murder people face to face. There is no great improvement in losing the infantry tradition and killing thousands of innocent people without face-to-face murder.

The nuclear wastes in and Chernobyl and the new Daichi site in Japan have a terrible cost and it should inspire us to see this as a very serious matter. However, while the durability of nuclear radioactivity is a unique problem and must be taken seriously the exact implications of these problems are not so obvious. We should have gone a long way to building up a banking system for soils and wad waters in a way that we never have.

I am rembering Election Day, the first Tuesday of November 2008. I am sure I will not finish the note on this day. I am starting early in the morning before any polls have closed. I have to try to determine in my own how the outcome of that election affects the final shape of this note. I am writing about Sex, Race and Religion as political factors in the modern world. The United States of America on that night was about to elect either the first woman Vice-President or the first openly African-American President. I voted for Palin.

The truth of the matter is that we faced many challenges as a country and it had not been easy to say how much the Sex, Race and Religion of various candidates and voters wil matter in this regard. America is a single country even if it is also a diverse federal unioon of States in a larger and more complicated world. It is not the largest country in population, does not have the largest land area and faces many problems. Nonetheless, it is a very strong country and a great one by many measures as well. We all divide ourselves into categories and labels within the totality of who we are. The same woman is sister, wife, mother, friend and daughter. In the same way we must say that none of us are only Americans or only American citizens. In my case I have spent so much time abroad that some people could legitimately wonder if my own attachment to the United States has not become very attenuated indeed. However, the last four years have further changed the percentages in favor of time spent here in the United States. I have spent virtually the entire Obama Presidency in the United States of America. I find that living in the United States is troubling oftentimes but never do I think that any other place is my home. Further, I also find other places troubling which is added on to the fact of being a foreigner in the midst of those troubles.

I was posting a Facebook Note which I had been writing as they began to call many states at about 8:30 Central Standard Time on Election Day. It was starting to look like Obama and Biden have won. I really felt that for me the country is simply moving further and further into a cosomolgy and view of the country’s future that cannot include me. I don’t like Barack Obama and I think his election is a good reason to believe that the country is not one for me to rear children in and makes me glad that I have so very litlle to lose. I may choose to live out what’s left of my life here or not but really it merely confirms all that is wrong with me and America as a long-term match. Perhaps Michelle Obama and I have more in common than I have articulated in that prior to the election she had never felt proud to be an American. I have often been ashamed of many things going on in my country. I still get sick thinking of how much celebration there was of the Obama Presidnecy. I was then on that Election Day and still am tonight tired of struggling to find a way to fit in with this country and tired of the nightmare its future is for me.

I am not a Republican and I value the idea of re-empowering Labor and Trade Unions if that were done properly. I value a more vigorous regulatory climate than Republicans support. I value the idea of challenging a stranglehold by corporate America over economic policy. There ought to have been some part of me that was happy about this outcome but I think that I am almost totally unhappy about the outcome.

Race is a significant part of my unhappiness. I think that blacks terrorize white children in lots of schools and neighborhoods, they commit sprees of violent crimes that control the lives of poor whites in many areas. Black violent supremacy and African American tyrrany is a reality for many millions of Americans. I think having this disciple of Rev. Wright in the White House will plunge many people into a deeper pool of horror and despair. Obama will energize the violent and stubborn blacks full of anger and resistance to defy all sense of civility. Life has almost certainly ended for some large number of white, North East Asian and other kids because violent black criminals have been surer of themselves. Among the meekest members of poor white communities nobody will denounce the Blacks. The Black tyrants of the American social order are out there killing, terrorizing and destroying with a new zest every day now. It will not likely cause more positive cohesion in the African-American community. Most mixed populations with black chief magistrates have seen rising crime rates, a black machine that defends itself over public interest and which energizes black violence and animus against whites. This is now our national future.

I do not think that America will ever have another real chance at finding a path towards progressive civilization. We have elected a man with a long-history in a white-hating church, a man who has no real ties to the Civil Rights struggle but a great deal of ties to the Afro-Islamic demographic invasion of recent years. He is a sign of ending the old legacy of progress in the African-American Community which had been brutalized by white racism from time to time. He is a way of realligning Black Americans with a huge foreign web of people with centuries of history in exploiting, enslaving and slaughtering white people.

Women did not vote for Palin in exceptionally large numbers it seems. This is a sign that her kind of womanhood is not unifying but the path of radiocally unbalnced feminist madness often is mobilizing. For me there is no marriage at stake here but I do think that this adds a nother reason why someone like me would be well advised not to marry here. In my own marriage philosophy and politics were a real source of tension and stress. However, the lack of energy for political change affirms to me that most American women do not share my admiration for many of the qualities of Sarah Palin. When I add that to the mismanagement of the pro-life movement, the belief that gay marriages are a right and the sense that my own life in this country is really pretty bad it is easy to be thankful to be separated from marriage’s promise of a future.However for someone like me to be glad not to be married is really a kind of sacrilege.

The inability of people of faith to come together in positve ways during the Bush Administration was very notable to me. Reverend Wright’s sermons were the sermons that our time and place seem to deserve. This is not the liberalism of Habitat for Humanity, Bread for the World and other quasi-religious groups this is a mess of angry and alienated groups. Clinton managed to kill families at Ruby Ridge and Waco despite being willing to deal with religious people at a variety of levels. But it seemed to me even then on election night before the coercion of Catholic charities, before the mysterious coonections and coincidences within the radical Islamic world had come to light and before Obama had trashed the secular temple of the Space Program I sensed that a Saracen raider had ridden into the White House with a coallition built on hate and desire for destruction wearing a mask.

4. Waste and Accounting

Waste is perhaps tha biggest and most dangerous problem of the world in our time. If that is the case then America is among those countries most at fault for this crisis of waste. We need to rethink our economic theory in ways which allows us to do more to deal with reducing waste and using it to create opportunities.

5. The Space Imperative.

Pure sceince as found in the great atom smashers and and neutrino detectors is the wrong priority. We should have those things as they can integrate into the science of space colonization. Highes sceince must be bridled to the social goal of Space colonization. A few notches lower down sceintist could do whatever they can find to do but the peak must be space coloniztion for centuries to come. Both adventure and resources await our species throughout the solar system. There is little doubt in my mind that we damn ourselves quite seriously if we fail the challenge of securing access to both the adventure and the resources. Yes, I believe God has given the Moon and Mars to Earth’s people as part of our manifest destiny to colonize. It is part of becoming who we are meant to become.

If we had self sustaining and vibrant colonies on the Moon and Mars trading with Earth. Peopled by growing populations and settlers then our lives would resemble that of our human ancestors for long ages past. Most of us would not go to space and would not live their but we would know that we were living in a world of expanding possibilities. Inddeed it would be better than much of the past because almost all could see that were were bringin life where no life had been before. Being both sane and optimistic would again be really possible. The prospect of interstellar travel right now is a near impossibility. The possibility of interstellar travel in the future of a moderately badly run human society with real colonies on the Moon and Mars is substantial. The possibility of interstellar travel in the future of a society descended from us if we have a few centuries of colony driven development on the Earth, the Moon and Mars is very hight indeed. Once honest people can say to their children that our species is on its way to colonizing the worlds around as many stars as it seems right and convenient to colonize then our whole frame of reference will have changed for what the Human race is about and can expect.

The most important factor about interstellar travel initiated by the human race is that it would be by far the best if it came after about 500 years of intense development of the Solar System. When there are thousands of operatiing populated spaceships, a dozen or more space stations and large factories and ports on the Moon and Mars fed by Lunar and Martian farms and with labor and finace experienced in space then interstellar travel and starships will have a different appeal than they can as we live in a world where perhaps none of the things listed above will ever happen. I believe we can begin to envision many of the steps we have to undertake. I have included some drawings and illustrations that I have posted in the Crater Cap Concept Colony Group as milestone on that projected road.

Humanity must perfect the colonization of craters in varied situations.Robotic ships on Mars starting the process will be a kind of simple practice for interstellar colonization as well as being the basis of much of the future economy.Craters will become huge complexes of cities and farms in some cases. But robots can start the all-important capping process.Eventually systems like my catapult idea would tie Earth to continuos and efficient launches into space just as imports fom space colonies and prodution for space in space will create a huge part of the economy.

What we need to do to get to be a species that lives engaged with the universe of our perception is first to dwvlope this solar system. This process will of course vastly impact our societies and culture. Not doing it is already having an impact. I believe this process can involve creation of entire Earethly eco-systems in canyons. It can be largely humane and part of a larger blossoming of human culture. One of my new Facebook friends Shaun Waterford is developing (and has largely developed) asystem of underwater habitats. I think colonizing the Moon and Mars can lead toa great synergy and cross-fertilization of ideas with those who want to explore the great potential of responsibly colonizing the pelagic ocean floor, seamounts and underwater coastal flats. Most problems will be different between spae and the sea. However, a huge number of problems will be the same, similar or have complimentary solutions. So what could life in space be like?

Life must be centered for centuries in craters on the Monn and on Mars. Craters are distinct features which can be studied and which have common characteristics. They exist on the Earth, the Moon, Mars, asteroids, several moons of our solar systems planet and can be theorized to exist in or near many other objects around our sun or other stars. Capping a crater has an intrinsic economic and resource wisdom to it because one is using the enormous energy already expended in creating the bowl and only creating one side. Frequently one could achieve enormous benefeits in blicking our cosmic rays and radiation. All of these benefits are true even for asteroids. However, in larger round objects like the Moon and Mars it is very likely that one could use the gravity to create a highly functioning biospheric hemisphere. In terms familiar to some, one could make a terrarium including one or more aquaria. Whether or not there is air or liquid water on the heavenly body would have little to do with the success of the crater cap colony. People could live in these and that is the basis of our little concept group.just a crude drawing of a robot for for the Mars early phaseSecond drawing of MATCHES (Mars Access to Crater Habitat Exploration Ship)Last of MATCHES drawings.I also think that once there is a crater colony (or certainly a few crater colonies) thriving on the moon then one would have a basis for many industries. Things manufactured on the moon would be esily lifted and deployed to Mars colonization, to space ships, to eath orbiting stations and to asteroid miners. One sixth gravity is economic magic that would make all solar system operations entirely different. Producing goods in space and dropping them to earth is intrincsically cheap. Thus carbon fuels highly refined could be lifted to the moon wherthe will be mixed with gasses made impure for colonies by various accidents and industries. These fuels would lift six times as much from the Moon as the would from the Earth and these fuels would not affect Earth’s air and climate when burned. Very precious things would be “downported” by Earth to maintain a balance. In the distant future components of landing craft returning to Earth would be built with precious metals needed by agencies and nations on Earth. This would create a flow of commerce to bring our population base into outer space. Within a few centuries perhaps a significant minority of cities and farms could be in outer space without any flash bang science that includes things we cannot imagine.

Picture yourself coming over the colony you are going to land on from orbit in a spaceline which has left a space station orbiting the Earth. You get a view from above of the mature crater cap colony. The white or other colored sheet covers the top of a crater and has few buildings but some identifying markings on it. You know the sheet is the uppermost of numerous layers in the crater cap. The clean sheet allows the features of this top to be studied from space, all colonies pay for numerous lunar sattelites and ships to photograph there colonies as they pass over. The richest have their own lunar-synchronous satellites. The blue discs you see from the space liner are solar power centers. The two railways intersect with a single airlock on the surface sheet. The colony has almost no profile or outlying features — you know farms, towns and mines are below the surfaces of these caps. While colonization proper is centered in craters there are still be plenty of astronomical observatories, laboratories, pipelines and spaceports which allow the colonists to have an exposure to their unearthly surroundings which over a lifetime amounts to a possible amount of exposure to the harsheness of space and the Moon’s natural environs we can scarcely imagine. However, when you arrive in your magnetically shielded and armored train to the Crater Cap Concept Colonies you enter the airlock and realize that you will almost certainly never return to Earth. An advanced society realizes that for most people the tip to space must be one way or it will never succeed as a way of life. But in the Crater colony life could be very much like Earth except that it would be lived in an earthly ecosystem and by earhtly pople under conditions of one sixth gravity on the Moon or one third gravity on Earth. There is no absoluteassurance it will be well done but if it were done well life could be pretty good there. Some colonies will get close to paradise and some will get close to hell as they are matured and countless decisions add up. Good life will be possible as good is defined in the minds of ordinary folk who are not as interested in science fiction as I am — is a possibility in space colonies.

Using entrances to mines that radiate from the crater with its central fertile fields and pure cliff dwellings that draw from traditions such as the Anasazi and Nabateans beautiful and functional residences with extra safety from breached caps would not use the fertile floors of the crater colonies. Each country and colony could develope a unique architecture in each miniature world that a crater would constitute.Many animals could adapt to life in these crater colonies.

The roll of animals and plants would evolve over time. the choice of animals and plants once an atmosphere was created would be varied. The early years we be very much better than life on the surface but much worse than any Earthly desert. Then there would be functioning small gardens and a pond with breathable air and the process would be onits way. Chickens could roost high on the walls and fly though the pressurized air in low g. with their aerating feet and droppings they would help in the phese of turning the floors of regolith into real soil.Larger crater rims would have parks around some of the more massive foundations of the cap. These parks would be outside themain warm and wet circulation of air in the colony. This would enable a cooler drier microclimate to make for a more pleasantly diverse living environment. Fish living in bodies of water on the moon and mars would be able to fill a normal if assisted ecosystem. Then children vould carry emergency vaccum suits in sealed cans as a weight when venturing into this wilderness area. They would benefit from the incidental weight training. Adults might be allowed to determin e their own risk and decide to use the suit/weight cases or not. Studies of the ill health effects of microgravity on the Space station tell us almost nothing about life in low gravity. Low gravity and true microgravity have so little in common. Living things operate in ranges. There would surely be benefits to some in low gravity whereas in true microgravity the negatives are too hard to overcome to realize many benefits.

Science fiction is one of the arts of our own time and place. We are invited by it to look at what we can do and how e can do it. I do hope though that because so much of our fiction is interstellar we are not distracted fro the great adventure in our solar system which really is calling to us and which will shape much of our destiny.

Outer space is that portion of the universe that is farther from the center of the Earth than the highest reaches of the Earth’s atmosphere. It makes up more than 99.99999999999999% of the universe which we can physicaly perceive. If we were to divide up all of the physical space we can see or detect equally among all the inhabitants of the Earth the amount of space occupied by all humans alive today would make a minute and entirely insignificant portion of the share belonging to each person. However, most of that space is dark empty and has hardly any atomic particles in it and it is so far away that physicaly using those particles in any way in the next 100 generations can’t be reasonably imagined. But even our solar system alone would allow us to use a fraction nearly as big as that we started this argument with or maybe bigger. In the solar sytem most of the oxygen is in outer space, most of the carbon is in outer space, most of the hydrogen is in outer space, most of the helium is in outer space, most of the metals we call precious are almost cerianly there and the metals we need for highly specialized uses abound in outer space. It is almost certain that there is more liquid water under the ice of Jupiter’s moon Europa than there is on Earth. Nothing between the Sun and the orbit of Pluto is intrinsically beyond the reach of our own basic technology to reach, tag and return from roboticaly. Cost, law, design glitches and time are clearly identifiable obstacles. I said these things were not intrinsically impossbible by rearranging and refining existing technology. Given thse basic facts, I believe that an aggressive space policy is in the interest of all humans and of the Earth and all its species so long as it is mostly a wise policy or even largely a wise policy.

Space colonization follows a chain going from observation, to exploration, to travel and exploration and then to stationing. After these things comes colonization. Space colonization has the chance to be the biggest change in human economy since the development of agriculture. The coming of agriculture was not an unmixed blessing but it was one of the most justifiable of all social changes in human history. Had humanity not become agricultural sooner or later things would have become much worse than they have gotten so far. Life today awaits at a crossroads as great as that of agriculture.The great works of irrigation for large scale agriculture created the mighty powers that ruled ancient China and Egypt and created societies that could pour weatlh into purchases that enabled other peoples to change from nomadic hunting or nomadic herding to a combination of nomadic herding and carrying trade goods. It enabled fisherfolk to increase their population by adding waterborne trade to their fishing economy. It enabled warrior bands to enter inot long-term contracts with landholding kings and to earn a livingpartly from keeping the peace. Agriculture really made a different human world and remade much of the world as well. The best hunter-gatherers were actually richer, healthier and freer than the new farmers but in the end the choice of the species as a whole to emphasize agriculture was a choice vital to both survivial and any real chance of prosperity. I think that space colonization requires a simlar leap and offers similar sets of consequences. I don’t really expect to live to see a working colony on the Moon or Mars. However, as long as I do live I will apply some of my energy to that transition humanity must make towards becoming a space colonizing species. The Crater Cap Concept Colony is the model I think we should be pushing towards making a reality.

While astronomy has always been a discipline that was a significant teacher and leader into fields of knowledge for much of the human race’s journey into development — it must yield to the leadership of those who will build permanent and sustainable colonies. On the day when Humans have a few colonies on the moon with tens of thousands of residents each it will be very easy to make huge progress i astronomy. However, aiming only for a golden age of astronomy will not necessarily bring about lunar colonization. The larger possibility must find the rank and leadership in these areas.

Once we have a couple of crater colonies on the moon we would need geosynchronous sattelite and another base perhaps at an L point between lunar and Terran gravity. These would be the places where all aging nuclear waepons were diposed of by either being loaded on spacecraft for second or third explosions or used in initial explosions to launch really massive spacecraft to move very fast on the way to other colonies and smaller robots on their way to the stars.

None of this is pure fantasy. I think we should divide up most of the surface of the Moon and Mars among all of earth’s nations unequally, sell some as new national sites and keep a good portion as a permanent UN mandate. Failing to act wisely now either means we willl lose humanity’s greatest economic opportunity or else nd up with a really horrible policy made under more pressing conditions. I am not optimistic that we will make good choices. But I think our behavior in this century will determine the human future’s outlook for all of foreseeable human society.

I am committed to specific goals but I support all who are sincerely striving for a human future in space that is wise and sustainable. Good luck and God Bless to all of you out there. I am not a likely expert or member of the space community but I cherish this hope for an expanding future. Perhaps the amateurish perspective will cost me a few Facebbok friends. I lost two inj the first year and have lost four lately. However, I am grateful for the professionals on my list at the time of this writing.

6. Constitutional Thinking

I have created a model for a new constitution of the United States. This could be adopted or modified and adopted by a constitutional convention. It is a possible appraoch to real and lasting change. It is outside of the mainstream of political discussion in my lifetime.
You can check out these ideas and this model at this link:
https://franksummers3ba.wordpress.com/major-themes-of-this-blog/new-model-constitution-of-the-united-states-of-america/

Any time a link does not work remember to try copying and pasting it into your browser. However, I believe the link should work well.

Moving to a D Minus World Part Two of Two
by Frank Wynerth Summers III on Tuesday, March 13, 2012 at 11:37am ·
7. Understanding Women, Men and Feminism

Men have a great deal of manning up to do if we are going to survive. However, this is the kind of manning up which acknowledges and does not destroy womanhood. There has been a long tradition of bad sexual behavior among people inmy view. I do believe it is possible for something to be long-lasting and widespread as well as deeply wrong.

First, human females are truly shockingly extraordinary. They are not only very different from men they are different from other female earthlings. Women distinguish our species so enormously that it is simply inevitable magic. The combination of human extreme bipedalism (walking on two feet) and the shape of chidlbearing hips combine with prominent breasts to create a figure which is very extreme sexual dsiplay compared to men’s beards and very little else is so specifically developed as sexual flesh. This is somewhat different from our nearest biological relatives the apes. It is very distinct from the myriad examples of ducks, deer, chickens, lions, turkeys and other well known species where the male expresses the physical “come hither” material in the sexual dialog. In most species there is either no sexual dimorphism meaning there is asexual morphism — meaning males and females look mostly alike OR the male wears the plumage.

Having shown a major difference we are only geeting started. A heathy adult female can have coitus on any day at any period of that day. Most females are penetrable (in species like large animals which penterate) only infrquently and are fertile only on these realtively rare occasions. Healthy adult human females are fertile and infertile every month when they are not pregnant or lactating to supply a dependent nursing heavily. The variations between fertile and infertile periods within the month are not common to the whole species nor linked closely to the weather but vary from woman to woman. Further, there is very little physical difference between fertile and infertile women so that estrus is largely hidden. This is also a very limiting set of sexual characteristics which human famles share with few if any other females on Earth if taken as a whole.

To add another level of complexity to the totality of the factors in the paragraph above the human female fertility cycle matches the length of one of the most obvious cycles on earth that of the moon but is not tied to its periodicity. It generaly runs according to the woman’s own biology but does tie in and sychronize to some degree with women she lives with and is somewhat (but very subtly and eraticaly) related to sexual stimulus from men especialy in very young women.

Additional to all the other differences there is the difference between the baby dlivered by a woman and an adult human. That difference is called the “degree of neotony”. Almost no creature has a greater degree of neotony and when one combines this degree of neotony with the degree of involvement and care a young human will generaly accept and seek from its mother this creates a greaer demand and matched capacity for mothering per individual human than almost any other earthly species.

These are actually only a few of the reasons why women are objectively one of the most fascinating and compelling subjects to which one could apply the human mind. I actually believe that one of the greatest windows for insight into the state of well-being, progress and potential of any society is to look at women as women within that society.

There are a great number of things to learn if one wants to understand womanhood and perhaps in the modern age we are losing the last ties to many of them. Among the most influential men of my own lifetime a few of them have been distinguished in large part by something having to do with sex and womanhood. These include Karol Wotija/ Pope John Paul II, Ronald Reagan, Hugh Heffner, Bill Clinton, Prince Charles Arthur George Saxe-Coburg-Gotha- Battenburg-Lyons-Windsor (or whatever one chooses to call the current Prince of Wales) and John F. Kennedy. However, unlike many religious people what strikes me about the modern era is how sexles and lifeless it is not how we are all a bunch of sex maniacs. These men while very different from one another are perhaps more normal in that sex is a pulsing shaping force in their public biography. Most modern biographies are perhaps best described as freakishly wierd. Sex is not a side note to the decisions people make in public office. Sex is very much a part of a sane governance.

In a royalist or aristocratic high republican or a number of other regimes the family has a stature which can tie together the privacy of sex, affection and home with the qualities of a public institution.The modern era has largely abandoned this whole vast set of institutions and patterns which tie these huge parts of the world together.

The point of all this is not that women should have no meaning or existence outside of their role as sexual coun terparts to men and mothers to children. However, the point is to show thattheir is almost limitless capacity for development and discussion in that aspect both of women and of the idea of women. To know woman one must first renounce that kind of asexual androgyny which has had a great deal of credence and influence in the world of my lifetime. Men and women are profooundly different and that difference is vital, useful and profoundly energizing in a decent and healthy society.

There are many layers of sexual exchange and perception between men and women. The Bible is one of the sources for wisom and the perception of ages regarding the relations of men and women. In the iconic story of Adam and Eve in the Book of Genesis in the Bible Adam is the first man and his words upon seeing the first woman are memorable. As Genesis 2: 22b-25 states:” When he brought her to the man the man said.”This one, at last, is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh;This one shall be called “woman” for out of “her man” this one has bee taken.”That is why a man leaves his mother an father and clings to his wife, and the two of them become one body.The man and his wife were naked but they felt no shame.”

The extreme intimacy of the passage is in comparison to the anmials with whom Adam cannot marry or form an intimate partnership. But it remains a very intimate passage. There is almost nothing that has been mor under sustained attack for millenia than this excited, intimate and personal recognition by man of his mate in women. Real moral science ia very demading and elegant pursuit and thus is more often abandoned than pursued. However, real moral science must always take a careful measure of relations between the sexes.

I think it deserves to be said in this context that I believe in a moral struggle as a desirable thing. I find that those who are not struggling have usually settled for something bad. One of the powerful shaping forces of humanity as it is remains the strong belief that anything related to the relational structure of humanity must either be very ancient, fixed and setled or else a really blank slate upon which any given generation can write or draw whatever it wants. For me I think that the entire mystery and meaning of humanity is something quite different. Humans have numerous intrinsic qualities that cannot really be changed much in any generation. Yet one may face the future with confidence when aware of these strictures of the past and present. A generation and an individual can compose any vast number of varied tunes using these notes given by nature. By preserving and fully working the great musical tradition one can even enhance the range and delicacy of notes available to future generations of musicians. Sexuality and the role of women is one of the great musical worlds in which the human race can operate. It is an area where we all practice some form of art whether or not we even acknowledge it.

What evolution, the idea of original sin, reincarnation, eugenics and quite a few other theories about the proper living out of humanity have in common is the idea that we pass on something different to the future based on our actions. Humans may not agree on what the mechanism for passing things on is, nor what ought to be passed on, nor how that which is passed on relates to present behavior. But in many different ways and at many different levels of intensity we remind ourselves and are reminded by those we put in charge of our most serious thinking that we are changing the present of future generations by how we live out our own present here and now.

This is a rather serious business and humans are able to make rather substantial changes in the population in relatively short periods of time. One of the most notable struggles of human race is our struggle to define and make ourselves as a species. That our greatest project is ourselves is a perspective which gives great importance to waman’s involvement in the human adventure. One of the characterisitics of the modern era is that we expect the totality of sexual relations to be easily defined. Consider that terms like: harem, concubine, paramour, mistress, courtesan, sister-wife, rival, Abbess, novice, midwife, maid, lady-in-waiting, placement, princess, Queen, Official Mistress and countless others once denoted roles which were available to women in many cases simultaneously and which in huge numbers of places have all disappeared down to the last one. I write here not so much to change the world but more as any defeated soldier may write when he decides that before his life ends he wants to make really clear how badly he views this new order and the triumph of what he fought against. So for me I see layer upon layer of both personal defeat and the coming to an end of much of what makes the human species human. It goes back to my recurring theme thayt life has mostly been a nightmare.

One thing about sex and womanhood being very near the core of the human moral struggle is that the issues related to womanhood and sexuality are subject to the same regional and epochal variations as are other part of the human moral drama. From my point of view I may say that all humans are severely confused and diseased in their understanding of these things. However, I would not say that they or we all suffer from the same delusion or disease. We may all be in error but we are in distinct errors across the species. A loose translation of the Bible called the Catholic Living Bible translates a passage as follows: Luke 11: 45-47a”Sir,” said an expert in religious law who was standing there, ” you insult my profession, too, in what you just said.””Yes,” said Jesus, “the same horrors await you! For you crush men beneath impossible religious demands that you yourselves would never think of trying to keep. Woe to you!””

Sex is an area where evil intentions , evil plans and hate often come dressed up as morality. One of the greatest problems humanity faces is the problem of overcoming the advantages acrued by evil in human affairs once evil is recognized as a real thing. I think that for me sex is an aspect of the human condition which accentuates hoew badly flawed our species is and yet, at the same time, is the point of glory at which we can most resemble the species we were once meant to be.

Sex remains the great risk and gamble on which we still place the most on the table. Where we can never entirely wipe out our divine destiny whether we believe in it or not.I think of Lawrence Summers my distinguished nonrelative ( as far as i know) who has had his name on the money of the United States of America and beeen president of Harvard and I think of the uproar and probable beginings of the move to boot him from the presidency of that famed institution. He merely suggested that the difference in representatation in hard sciences and maths and engineering between men and women migh have something to do with natural predilections varying by sex. He did not say women could not be good engineers, scientists or mathematicians. This is a story where I think the female faculty at Harverd is 100% justified in being very vigilant to the point of near para noia in guarding access to these fields for women candidates. I think Lawrence Summers — aside from having phenomenaly good taste in last names — was fully justified in speculating that there may be proclivities varying by sex which were relevant here. I think in that regard both sides in the dispute acted as relatively wise and intelligent people. Nonethless, I would favor the Swedish Parliament funding a Special “Silly Goose Award” comparable to the Nobel prizes they already give out and making all parties to this public dispute designated recipients. “Sex” it has often been said “makes fools of us all”.

Years ago, I watched the Miss USA Pageant and therewas speculation that one of the finalists was effectively disqualified by the very verbaly abusive ( on the web later) Perez Hilton for saying that she personally believed marriage was meant to be between a man and a woman. Mr. Hilton is misogynistic scum. That is a quality which abounds in male humans. His audacious moral hideousness in going into an inner sanctum of hetero-sexual celebration of attraction and oing all that he has done is vile. But so is covering over millions of cases of rape with non-notification laws on abortions for teenage girls. So is the female genital mutilation of millions of women throughout the world to destroy their sexuality. So is the killing of countless girls and women without prosecution by their families and lovers every year in the worst situations and without hope of justice all around the world. I am not sure the ladies of Harvard can afford quite the ivory tower they live in. However, in that way they resemble their male counterparts.

I do not believe that the story at the begining of the book of Genesis was written by Moses after visiting the origins of the human species in a time machine. I do not believe the writer had a Ph. D. in biology. I do not believe it is a book coded from another book which was largely a straight first hand bio-history of its time — that is what I believe about the Gospels. I am even willing to say that he early stories are myths which is a word that atheistic relativistic scholars love to use for them. However, I do think that they are true stories written to pass on ancient coded trruths and insights which come from miraculousy ancient parts of the human story. Why is so much in the Bible coded?

That is a question for a long an important note on another occasion. In this note we will examine a bit more of Adam and Eve. There are three phases of the sexual relationship betwwen the two. in very general terms I mean for one could argue for a dozen phases.

The first is the phase in Genesis 2: 22-25b which I have already quoted this is the relationship between Man and Woman which God intended as unique to the human species. This really reflected the Image of an ultimate divine nature. The qualities of that relationship are intimacy, passion, empathy, excitement sex, good bodily self-image and fertitlity. It sounds tiring to those of us with enough mileage but otherwise one who can think can see the logic and goodness of it.

To preserve this humanity needed God’s friendship and to avoid eating the fruit of the knowleddge of Good and Evil. The writer here is using code for cannibalism. Yes, that again. The passage says that iti is a tree in the middle of the garden of course humans are in the middle of their own world always. That on the day one eats it humans will die and again if humans are eaten then the human eaten will die. It brings knowledge of Good and Evil and we actually have a lot of data across many centuries and cultures to show that eating human flesh is a passage which brings cunning, insioght and moral guilt into human minds in a unique way whether the society endorses or forbids cannibalism.

The last set of relations is the abusive marrasige and the loss of God’s friendship which define behavior which is in the survivable margin for humans as we currently are. These last two phases of the story are descibed in Genesis Chapter three. We all are still living in the last phase at best from the story’s own point of view.

It goes far beyond my capacity in time and space in tis note to show instances of cultures where men have driven their lands into desert and ruin to make sure that women were starving and dispossessed and fit into one of three (to them) acceptable catgories hyper-breeding terrified slaves, spies or religiously deluded cattle reared as food. This of course has always included the need to kill and maim some large number of men who cannot overcome (or heroicaly resist overcoming) their lover for mothers, sisters, and female lovers. Some of the time homosexuals have led this misogynistic elte.

Life is often hell and human society often a sewer which exceeds my capcity to express and usually it involves building things on one of two principles men hating women or women hating children. Often this is dressed up as religion or ideology but it is really about that. This engine allows the most foul and wothless kinds of people to amass almost all available power and resources. It has happened occasionaly since time imemorial.

The sexualy intense path of paradise requires lots of restriction and guidance in the real world. It always has unless you believe we may have had an unfallen Eden somewhere in the pre-historic past. But it is the path which produces real joy and love, wealth, pressure for progress and other necessities. I presume that almost everyone alive today is someone iI would consider fundamantally insane. But I do not take such a dim view of insanity as some do. Homosexuality is a condition of some sons of women which is in my view tolerable when thaose who are homosexual know it is alimiting thing and have the humility to see it as a speciai status with some rewards and some disease like qualities requiring a routine of self -care, or when they publicly acnkowledge it as a kind of loss in bio-sweepstakes in which they make the best out of a less than first place postion. But when they think as Mr. Hilton does they are evil men encouraging other evil men in a way which opens on to an ininite pool of evil.

Women are tied to certain kinds of inferiority too. the way a man is supposed to feel superior is in the act of achieving coital satisfaction. Unthinkably in allowing the killer and crusher in him to feel fed by her sufferings in pregnancy and child birth and then letting the good and protective part of him make it up to her in other ways. Women are supposed to have a capacity for maistakes as a class which is no the same in men. If women stopped getting pregnant and being a little optimistic about it when everything was bleak and horrible there would never be a brighter tomorrow. What is wrong is that there have for hundreds of centuries been people racing to the bottom giving women less and less of their share for breeding expenses as it were. There is a lot more I could say on this subject. Men have also been maimed and crippled by women in many ways and that is also part of the drama.

I believe that we all face a need for learning more and better views of marriage, culture , midwifery and other subjects. However, only when humanity is able to see that women were maent to inflame men and so were made by God and yet we cannot handle it can we begin to handle it. I truly think that both medical contraception and the church sponsored studies of natural familyu planning in recent centuries can bring us much closer to what we are menat to be. And yet I would be lying if I sadi that I believe the Catholic Hieracrhcy or Gynecolgists have handled the test very well. I think there is a massive sexual crisis on Earth and that is a separate note because it relates mostly to the last 1,500 years where as what I have discussed is about all humans at all times. In the West our current disoprder is usually to be blindly iresponsible and lie about why. In the East it is to use responsibiliuty as an excues for racing to the worst positions because they are sustainable. I think that anyone who believes in a God Gods, Fates, Karma or Providence should be very afraid to account for our species’ sexual legacy. THe rest of you, well you sort of amuse me –maybe that is your cosmic purpose.

8. A World Vision

America is a country which is deeply connected to the world. It has not only global responsibilities but also global connections of many types. It ought to be constituted in a way which is more representative of its make-up and function.

9. Subsidiarity

We must learn the values of subsidiarity in our politics, design, resource management and economics. There must be an effort to understand how life works and take those lessons seriously. This includes issues known in terms as diverse as States Rights, Faith Based Communities, Community Policing, Professional Autonomy, Family Rights and many other causes which do not work together day in and day out in the world.

10. Leadership

America is perhaps on its way to trying to become the complete sack of crap it has long been trying to become. If that is where it is headed then there is no way to advise anyone on how to get there. However, if it wants to end up somewhere else we need to really change our views and understandings as regards leadership. I refer anyone to my Model Constitution of the United States of America.

11.Violence, Homicide and Mortality

The idea of not colonizing space and encouraging organ transplantation and retitring at 90% of one’s salary at fifty to live as long as possible is all part of the Vampirization of American society and the world. I think that the United States and other coutries should compensate those who are condemened to die and care for their bodies well and still profit by selling their organs. I think that when there are likely deaths organs should be prepared to be harvested andsome of the proceeds of all this should be devoted to policing the industry. However, I might be much happier in a world where there was no organ transplantation. Many people think organs last for natural life in the recipient. They do not in the case of vital organ many peoples organs are taken from not entirely dead people and given to the same sick people over anover again. The medical docotrs of the world are leading an industry which is near serial killing at its best. However, The use of swapped cadaver organs for living and at that moment mudered donors, organ pirates, bribed record keepers and others thugs are vastly more numerous than anyone can imagine given the delusions we live in now.

http://www.everydayhealth.com/blogs/organ-transplant-a-daughters-perspective/how-long-do-transplanted-organs-last

“My mom had a different experience with each of her organs. Her first liver transplant (she was #212 at her transplant center) gave her nine months, her second transplant gave her five years, and her third transplant gave her almost six years. When I look at my mom’s experience, I am so grateful for those extra-special years and the people who made it possible.”

I bring children in my care to hospitals and doctors and many of my closest associates and family members are in allied fields to medicine. I even hope that medical doctors will try to save me if my life is in danger. However, most medical doctors expect to be regarded in such a way that their profession qualifies them to be treated as a combination of a saint and a playboy scientist. I feel that probably a more realistic and up to date trend would be to regard them as I might someone who was a professional Satanist High Priest and Vampire Cult operative. I am a Christian who believes the Devil has his due as the Bible reiterates continuously from Job, to the Gospels, to Acts. But to pretend there is somereason to believe the Medical profession today is not entirely morally depraved is absurd.

The contraception issue that has just been in the news has brought up questions of American Catholicism and how Catholics relate to the wonders of the new Medical paradise. Most American Catholics who are sexually active use, or have used or will use contraception regularly at some time in their lives. Many of them believe the Church must change its official position on the issue over time. However, many of those who use contraception, believe the Church must change its official position over time and have been involved in some way in spreading that viewpoint do not want the Church to throw the baby out with the bathwater. They do not want a church that allows their children to grow up thinking a pregnancy is a disease. They do not want their young men to grow up believing it is perfectly normal to have sex with a young woman he is not committed to and have her believe she alone is at fault if a pregnancy occurs and that marriage ought not to be considered. They do not want teenage forgetfulness to provide a huge boon to abortion mills. They do not want young women to separate motherhood entirely from their sexual drives and fantasies.

The medical industry is also so entirely devoid of sensibility and responsibility in what it will spend in th exetension of lives of the very sick, very old and very cowardly in ways which bankrupt civilization. Some would compare this to the expenses of the mortuary arts. However, tombs last for centuries and remind everyone who chooses to be reminded that we will remember and honor the dead. This improves the quality of life of everyone who wishes it to be improved because everyone who is not insane expects to be dead eventually even if their cosmology allows that there may be other theoretical possibilities.

The medical profession is leading us to become truly evil people. Meanwhile our social engineers, preachers, priests, therapists and lawyers are making sure that we do not believe in evil. This is done on both the popular side of the prevalent absurd purist moralists and the equally popular liars and amoralists. The only real hope is in the thousands of lawyers, clergy and doctors doing solid work which is exploited by the liars and crooks as cover for their vast criminal and evil empires of dehumanization.

I recently cited on my timeline the work of a woman who is a friend of mine who assists Amnesty International. She is not someone who is my follower or who agress with most or all of my political views. She cannot be blamed for my ideas just because we had some coffeee together years ago and I think she is a fascinating person. Those are not radical positions they are only past events and my opinion. She is a Jew and an American of Italian-Hebrew descent. There have been many tribes and communities that tried to give value and dignity to human life. CS Lewis showed in the book Abolition of Man: Illustrations from the Tao how this moral symphony has existed in various cultures. However, by far the most serious efforts to prevent wholesale slaughter of humans with impunity which exist in the modern era come from two roots. One of these roots is Judaism and the other is Taoism. the Han Chinese has somehow got into his or her genes a an actual revulsion when someone is killed without any compensation whatsoever. Chinese executions feature celebrity and dignity by tradition. There are beautiful suicide resorts for those who are expected to die for social reasons. The breeding of people is such that even the nobles families believe they have some blood connection to every part of the super-society so that all have a family share in the success of the greatest. These tradtions are thousands of years old and largely survive in Communist China. But make no mistake the Chinese system is all in favor of slaughtering people in large numbers for fun and profit. The Taoist simply sees life as an asset and is willing to sacrifice himself to assure that his or her fellow human is not deprived of the asset by a charlatan or a thief. Even war is a transaction in Chinese thinking. The other North East Asian cultures have borrowed through breeding and learning this Han Chinese attribute. It is not that their own cultures really suceeded in making it unpopular to just kill anyone you can but rather that life and people work better when murder is less available than tea. Thus they adopted their neighbor’s work over centuries.

My friend the Jewish woman hurts when people are killed deliberately by other pople. She accepts military self defense and tries to hide the fact that evy collateral victim is like a personal blow. She is very much a Jew. The Jews have not had their own country for milennia and have not had armies or courts that could sentence criminals to die since then until Israel. Those were important exceptions. The lack of those things has weakened them and my friend supports AI which opposes the death penalty — I am a cheerleader for the death penalty. The Jews must learn that there is a time to kill but they must not be ashamed that while Brits were celebrating house buildings by slitting babies throats and pouring the blood into the mortar and Germans were burning their slaves alive every holiday they were learning “thou shalt not kill”.
Ancient Israel had actual official genocsidal wars (like all their neighbors) but the actual generals, kings and capatins were constantly recogniuzing the humanity of their enemies and making treaties and then even making friends. They just could not help it. They had death penalites ofr prostitutes, homosexuals and witches but they had the annoying habit of recognizing the humanity of the accused and allowing due process, thus many were spared for technical, personal and legal reasons and built systems to protect themselves. It is a shame it is too late to enslave the European Germans because they sought to erase the people whom our civilization owes almost everything to and which all have known. They operated under Norse masterminds who have never been blamed. The German and Norse suffering for the Holocaust is so trivial it has at times mades me vomit to think about it. I do not fault those who value not killing people as AI does — they desrve a voice. Life ethics have taken centuries of hard work and are essential to everything else. This is threatened in our world.

Any worthy successor to Western Civilization which is going to emerge will need capital punishment, war with casualites on both sides, contraception and natural family planning together, preparing the very sick to accept death and an understanding of homicide in the East. However, such a capacity for accepting killing and death must be grounded in ahuge amount of work and respect which supports the unique value of human life.

12. Time Framing

The time for action has come a long time ago.