Crater Cap Colony Concept and other Endeavors of my life

by Frank Wynerth Summers III (Notes) on Tuesday, March 19, 2013 at 3:35pm

I write many notes that I do not much tag and make it a habit not too tage heavily in my notes. At the time I write this I have 1,149 Facebook friends and dozens of them (you) were members of the group at the center of this topic. Feel free to converse or comment but please do not be offended for not being tagged. Most of those who are tagged were not memebers. Some are both. I just tagged a sampling of relevant Facebook friends who may or may not choose to read this trhough. I am comemorating the passing of one of the reasons I first opened this Facebook profile and keeping the ideas out there in the world one more day. This Note is really about a broader topic than the on I have selected for the title but the one I have selected for the title does matter. I am writing this note about the exploration of space and the colonization of the solar system and about my own life and efforts as well. So in context here are some thoughts:

Recalling A Facebook Group

Years ago I founded a group on Facebook called the Crater Cap Colony Concept Group. That group has now been defunct longer than it was in existence but it did involve people from all around the world and have a great number of images, formulations, discussions and diagrams related to the colonization of the Moon and Mars. It was perhaps one of the most difficult and daring undertakings of my life to bring that group into bing and was in many ways the very antithesis of the Obama presidency’s real inner meaning regardless of what else is going to come out of this period of American History. The time and energy freed up for me since the demise of this group has been time to do other things and I have done other things. In fact my whole life has been active enough.
The careful and methodical closing of the Crater Cap Colony Concept Group has been the putting aside of a dream which was busily working on for a few years in that context. Everyone has dreams and almost all of us have dreams that do not come true and which mattered to us significantly. My father dreamed of teaching at a university when I was a little child and he never did. It has always intrigued me to do so but it has never been as much a dream for me and I have already taught at a university and at a lot of other places. My dad has done some teaching as well but not as a regular instructor at a university. My father is retired and sort of emeritus head of a missionary organization of Catholics now but one of the reasons he was given for being refused a teaching assistantship at one university that gave him an interview is that at the time he was an atheist and that particular institution did not hire atheists as instructors. Years later he returned to his Roman Catholic heritage. Teaching, reading and scholarship are ready parts of my life and already parts of my life. I have been out of school for a long time but not entirely separate from these things, nor from the contacts I made in school. This past year I took the revised GRE and seriously considered going back to graduate school. I was serious about the Crater Cap Colony Concept Group but it was a kind of seriousness that was attenuated by the great difficulty in achieving these goals. I chose to shut down the group when the format changed and felt certain about that choice but it was not a simple or pleasant choice to make.

The Crater Cap Colony Concept Group also gave me connections to many people and an opportunity for many interesting discussions. However, that was not the first time I had ever been plugged into large groups of peopIe or had conversations that I cared about. I have spoken to perhaps thousands and certainly hundreds of audiences in my life and I have written a lot. I have been published a good bit as well. That history of publishing includes a good number bylines in periodicals read by those around me and in the places where I functioned then and still function now. These media include the Abbeville Meridional, The Advertiser, Bonnes Nouvelles (Vermilion) and the already much mentioned Vermilion. In the Crater Cap Colony Concept Group I had a chance to express my own opinions but I have often done that elsewhere. I have had letters to the editor appear in a variety of venues a few times over many years but those include Time and Newsweek. My only truly academic publication is a review of F.D.R.’s Moviemaker: memoirs and scripts written by Pare Lorentz and published posthumously in 1992 by the University of Nevada Press. The review appeared in the Book Reviews section of the Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television in one of the issues of late 1992 or early 1993 on page 106 of that issue. I began that review with the words “Some memoirs and autobiographies of creative people require a sympathetic reading. Pare Lorenz’s memoirs do not.” My own brief autobiography in the Introductory personal statement on the old group cite may have required some sympathy to make good reading. But that is partly because there was a lot of my life to cover in a document like this and I was writing in the style one adopts when one knows that most of the essentials will not be covered I suppose.
My writing history has been in different categories, writing about Colonizing space was a special and useful outlet it has not and will not be replaced. I admit that one of my main motivations in founding the group was to seek out the institutional support for my own idea and to indulge my writerly interest in expressing that vision for the future which I still find essential. Since the closure of the group I have continued to comment on policy. I am (or at least often have been) a regular commenter on Lords of the Blog which has won the British Nominet awards as best public affairs blog. I am also a Grand Prize Winner on Lord Norton’s Quiz on that blog and have commented on his own The Norton View a great deal. I have over a thousand Facebook friends on the account where this note is first appearing. These Facebook friends are people who are very diverse and in many ways very select and elite as well. I have another account with hundreds of friends where I have an online novel which is largely set in Crater Cap colonies on the Moon that novel is the principal business of that second profile.

Thus if I am nostalgic about the old group that nostalgia must be seen in a realistic context. I still miss the group at times but it is not so easy to say why. I suppose part of it is a sense of being slighted or badly used in a number of ways and having suffered the effects of unfortunate circumstance. However, I have suffered a vast number of unfortunate circumstances and been slighted and ill used a vast number of times. Therefore that sense of injustice is not unique to the group either. I also have a sense of great opportunity lost and of wasted hope, energy and potential but that must be seen in the context of one who looks around the world and sees almost an infinite amount of lost and frustrated potential. One who finds a planet teaming with squandered opportunity and frustrated brilliance. The Crater Cap Colony Concept Group does not stand as lone mountain exceptional in a plain of even handed justice. Rather it is one copse of metaphorical trees of such frustration in a vast rainforest system of such ills.

I want to write about Space exploration, the space program and other things related to astronomy and other matters but I want to do so in a way which is responsive to the real context in which my own interest in Space and things related to astronautics has developed. For me the end of all things meaningful has been on a plane and trajectory at harmony with my life for a very long time. But still I am taking time to remember the end of this little Facebook group episode. I think that I have gotten too tired to recount all that has been lost
.
What the Crater Cap Colony Concept Was All About

This portion of the Note contains some material that has appeared on my Facebook page before now. I seek to articulate here what the CCCC Group sought to understand and bring to light in some kind of development. In origins and essence it grew from my own personal vision and beliefs as regards outer space itself. Outer space is that portion of the universe that is farther from the center of the Earth than the highest reaches of the Earth’s atmosphere. It makes up more than 99.99999999999999% of the universe which we can physically perceive. If we were to divide up all of the physical space we can see or detect equally among all the inhabitants of the Earth the amount of space occupied by all humans alive today would make a minute and entirely insignificant portion of the share belonging to each person. However, most of that space is dark empty and has hardly any atomic particles in it and it is so far away that physicaly using those particles in any way in the next 100 generations can’t be reasonably imagined. But even our solar system alone would allow us to use a fraction nearly as big as that we started this argument with or maybe bigger. In the solar sytem most of the oxygen is in outer space, most of the carbon is in outer space, most of the hydrogen is in outer space, most of the helium is in outer space, most of the metals we call precious are almost cerianly there and the metals we need for highly specialized uses abound in outer space. It is almost certain that there is more liquid water under the ice of Jupiter’s moon Europa than there is on Earth. Nothing between the Sun and the orbit of Pluto is intrinsically beyond the reach of our own basic technology to reach, tag and return from roboticaly. Cost, law, design glitches and time are clearly identifiable obstacles. I said these things were not intrinsically impossbible by rearranging and refining existing technology. Given thse basic facts, I believe that an aggressive space policy is in the interest of all humans and of the Earth and all its species so long as it is mostly a wise policy or even largely a wise policy.

What inspires me to write this note today is the small concept group which I mentioned in a previous Facebook note. I believe that the development of outer space is as important as anything else that confronts human beings in our age. The concept group was called Crater Cap Concept Colony Group. It is not the only group of people exploring the possibilities of space as a group and it is not the biggest such group either. However, it is certainly the only one that I had founded on Facebook. So that rates it an important mention in these notes.

Space colonization follows a chain going from observation, to exploration, to travel and exploration and then to stationing. After these things comes colonization. Space colonization has the chance to be the biggest change in human economy since the development of agriculture. The coming of agriculture was not an unmixed blessing but it was one of the most justifiable of all social changes in human history. Had humanity not become agricultural sooner or later things would have become much worse than they have gotten so far. Life today awaits at a crossroads as great as that of agriculture. The great works of irrigation for large scale agriculture created the mighty powers that ruled ancient China and Egypt and created societies that could pour weatlh into purchases that enabled other peoples to change from nomadic hunting or nomadic herding to a combination of nomadic herding and carrying trade goods. It enabled fisherfolk to increase their population by adding waterborne trade to their fishing economy. It enabled warrior bands to enter int0 long-term contracts with landholding kings and to earn a living partly from keeping the peace. Agriculture really made a different human world and remade much of the world as well. The best hunter-gatherers were actually richer, healthier and freer than the new farmers but in the end the choice of the species as a whole to emphasize agriculture was a choice vital to both survival and any real chance of prosperity. I think that space colonization requires a similar leap and offers similar sets of consequences. I don’t really expect to live to see a working colony on the Moon or Mars. However, as long as I do live I will apply some of my energy to that transition humanity must make towards becoming a space colonizing species. The Crater Cap Concept Colony is the model I thought then and still think now that we should be pushing towards making a reality. While astronomy has always been a discipline that was a significant teacher and leader into fields of knowledge for much of the human race’s journey into development — it must yield to the leadership of those who will build permanent and sustainable colonies. On the day when Humans have a few colonies on the moon with tens of thousands of residents each it will be very easy to make huge progress in astronomy. However, aiming only for a golden age of astronomy will not necessarily bring about lunar colonization. The larger possibility must find the rank and leadership in these areas.

Craters are distinct features which can be studied and which have common characteristics. They exist on the Earth, the Moon, Mars, asteroids, several moons of our solar systems planet and can be theorized to exist in or near many other objects around our sun or other stars. Capping a crater has an intrinsic economic and resource wisdom to it because one is using the enormous energy already expended in creating the bowl and only creating one side. Frequently one could achieve enormous benefeits in blicking our cosmic rays and radiation. All of these benefits are true even for asteroids. However, in larger round objects like the Moon and Mars it is very likely that one could use the gravity to create a highly functioning biospheric hemisphere. In terms familiar to some, one could make a terrarium including one or more aquaria. Whether or not there is air or liquid water on the heavenly body would have little to do with the success of the crater cap colony. People could live in these and that is the basis of our little concept group. that ended so long ago. It was confrimed in its hypothesis by many of the findings of lunar and Martian missions which have occurred since that time. I am including some drawings of various parts of the process at the end of this note without explanation.

I also think that once there is a crater colony (or certainly a few crater colonies) thriving on the moon then one would have a basis for many industries. Things manufactured on the moon would be easily lifted and deployed to Mars colonization, to space ships, to Earth orbiting stations and to asteroid miners. One sixth gravity is economic magic that would make all solar system operations entirely different. Producing goods in space and dropping them to earth is intrinsically cheap. Thus carbon fuels highly refined could be lifted to the moon where they will be mixed with gasses made impure for colonies by various accidents and industries. These fuels would lift six times as much from the Moon as they would from the Earth and these fuels would not affect Earth’s air and climate when burned. Very precious things would be “downported” by Earth to maintain a balance. In the distant future components of landing craft returning to Earth would be built with precious metals needed by agencies and nations on Earth. This would create a flow of commerce to bring our population base into outer space. Within a few centuries perhaps a significant minority of cities and farms could be in outer space without any flash bang science that includes things we cannot imagine.

Once we have a couple of crater colonies on the Moon we would need geosynchronous satellite and another base perhaps at an L point between lunar and Terran gravity. These would be the places where all aging nuclear weapons were disposed of by either being loaded on spacecraft for second or third explosions or used in initial explosions to launch really massive spacecraft to move very fast on the way to other colonies and smaller robots on their way to the stars.

None of this is pure fantasy. I think we should divide up most of the surface of the Moon and Mars among all of earth’s nations unequally, sell some as new national sites and keep a good portion as a permanent UN mandate. Failing to act wisely now either means we willl lose humanity’s greatest economic opportunity or else end up with a really horrible policy made under more pressing conditions. I am not optimistic that we will make good choices. But I think our behavior in this century will determine the human future’s outlook for all of foreseeable human society.

I am committed to specific goals but I support all who are sincerely striving for a human future in space that is wise and sustainable. Good luck and God Bless to all of you out there. I am not a likely expert or member of the space community but I cherish this hope for an expanding future. Perhaps the humanist and amateurish perspective will cost me a few Facebook friends. I lost some over the years of all types and besides professionals in space matters who mattered to me even lately. However, I am grateful for the professionals on my list at the time of this writing

The crater cap colony concept itself in diagram

details of a fast colonial ship design.

Thoughts on the Papacy of Francis: American Reactions

by Frank Wynerth Summers III ( Facebook Notes) on Saturday, March 16, 2013 at 9:02pm
It is an amazing achievement to have 266 successors to Saint Peter. Part of the joy of a Papal election relates to the sense Catholics have of all this. I am not really sure that I will ever feel the connection to any Papal transition that I felt to the start of John Paul II’s pontificate. Some have drawn comparisons between our current Pope Francis and John Paul I. I hope that nobody feels the shadow of the worst and most obvious aspect of that Pontificate. I want to say that I am writing this note as much about myself as about the Pope in one sense. I am looking at the specific aspects of the papacy which seem particularly relevant to me as a citizen of the USA and as one who is associated with the people I know and relate to in my life. The Pope is in many ways an affirmation of my life: my name, ties to Latina America and experience with the Jesuits. But I will alsomention some unique causes for concern. I have spent lots of time with Jesuits and in Latin America. Ialso have a strong interest in Eastern Christianity and although I cannot get into that aspect of this Pope very well it is one of his strenghts that he is aware of and knowledgeable about the Eastern Catholics with their languages rites and married clergy. But I will not give details here of my own biography I will only give a very few of his biographical notes. I want to look at reactions and feelings as well.

Clearly Pope Francis has the strength and resources necessary for a long and challenging reign if his health and circumstances permit such a thing. I will suggest that as to the nervousness many feel some of it is an unconscious response to some unique qualities of the current situation. Many Catholics may in a rational way feel that it is important for us to recognize that we have an historic opportunity to recognize this new Pope from the Americas and to see the hand of God in all of this and yet there are reasons that while many may rejoice in the humility and informality of manner of the new Pope it is also concerning in a church as large and diverse as this. We must trust and do trust that all is in good order but yet we wonder if the combination of communication between current and former Popes and the manner of the new Pope make it unclear who is the Pope. Yet there are surely many reasons why the average Catholic can proceed with confidence regardless. Nonetheless, one can suggest that while not being all that uncertain, this is the most uncertain trumpet call that the rank and file of Catholics may remember in the Holy See. For we have a Pope whose due and proper election nobody doubts who is still alive and we have another Pope who has foresworn most of the trappings of the taking of command. We all know he has taken command but only with reason and not so much with our subconscious minds.

In my confidence that we do in fact have a new Pope, I am writing a note about my first reaction to the election of Pope Francis. I do not think that there is a simple reaction that covers all the aspects of what I feel and think. But perhaps there is something I might be able write that is both true and insightful. First I want to really welcome to the titles of Supreme Pontiff, First Among Patriarchs and our Vicar of Christ this new man Jorge Mario Cardinal Bergoglio former Archbishop of Buenos Aires and now Pope Francis! A joyous day for the first Jesuit pope, the first of his chosen name, the first from this hemisphere and the first from outside Europe in well over one thousand years. This is a happy and exciting day for me as a Catholic. I am moved and touched and expected to be neither even if a very great man were elected. An old friend asked me why I was moved and I tried to respond as best I could by remarking that I have known many Jesuits they have been my closest friends among the clergy, I mentioned them in my note on the transition, I am pleased to have a Latin American, pleased with much of his resume and although he was not on my very short list of preferred candidates he is one I thought well of overall. But really emotions are not reason, I did not expect to be moved this time mostly because I am in a generally bad mood. But I was wrong, I was moved and feel hopeful. I am also touched because my name is Frank and many of my friends have called me Francisco which is the name he will ask his friends to call him now in the third person. Beyond all that, it relieves on who has long lived present to all the world to have an Italian-American clearly demonstrate that the New World can produce a Pope who is taken seriously by all those European Cardinals and others.

Besides being a Latin American he is most notably a Jesuit. He will be required to distance himself more from his order than would some other order which welcome the fuller participation of those in very high Church office. He is already in that catgory of exclusion as a Cardinal under the Jesuit rule and arguably as a Pope will be more able to bend the rules than before. the Society of Jesus—the Roman Catholic religious order, also known as the Jesuits. As the largest male religious order of the Catholic Church, the Society of Jesus is present in virtually every country in the world, currently organized in roughly 100 Provinces and Regions. However they have a strong tradition of not contending for the Papacy from this unique position and there are countless other obstacles. However, in addition to being present to most local churches and cultures, the Society is an international body, and has always sought ways to strengthen our ministries via international collaboration through the close relationship between two Jesuit Provinces called twinning and the new development by the Society of Jesus of structures called Conferences which bring together Provinces in major geographical areas so that they might work together more effectively. With a huge presence in the Roman Curia and this expertise in dealing with many of the issues facing the Church around the world.

The fact that his father was an imigrant from the same part of Italy as his maternal grandparents hailed from does not change the fact that he was born to a native Argentine mother and is himself a native Argentine. There are certainly priest in Latin America who are deeply influenced by the Marxian and Marxist streams of thought and activity but Pope Francis was not one of those. However, he did grow up and has lived out his life in the great Latin American debate about justice. That is a conversation that has shaped much of my own life and thought as well.United States Americans wonder where this conversation will lead. I think Pope Francis will make us think a great deal more as a church about Justice than we sometimes have but I do not think he will lead us in the mode of a radical Leftist critique. Perfect justice is not attainable here and now on planet Earth and it is certainly a question honest people can debate as to whether it is ever obtainable. But to strive for justice and seek it out is one of the great human ventures. I am very interested in justice and always have been. But I am aware that merely seeking justice in general has a real price.

I am writing this note with more than a little bit of a heavy heart. Yet with a sense of resolve as well…
The truth is that there is only the weariness of long sensing justice denied in one’s own life that distinguishes those who become the most determined resisters of the status quo from many of their neighbors.

There have been many reactions that I have been aware of in this process. I am going to quote a part of two priestly reactions and to be fair both of them move to more deliberately positive and hopeful reflections on the new papacy than what my quotes represent. However, the shared surprise indicated in their responses seems to be worth quoting here. A priest on my Facebook friends list who ministers on the campus of my undergraduate alma mater blogged: “Just like most everyone else, I was shocked when the name surname “Bergoglio” was pronounced by Cardinal Tauran. Like so many, I was expecting to hear Scola, Ouellet, Ravasi, O’Malley, or even Dolan. But obviously, the Holy Spirit had other plans. Indeed, in his choice of fishermen as the first apostles, Christ chose the individuals others would least expect to be leaders of his Church. Christ has a habit of confounding the worldly wise! These other Cardinals seemed to many from both within and without the Church, to be the most “logical” possible successors of John Paul II and Benedict, but the Cardinals were inspired in a different direction. It’s humbling to realize how easy it is for us, even as faithful Catholics, to think we know what is best for the Church. How our ways are not God’s ways! (I will admit I was pulling for Ouellet because he directed my thesis, and I thought it would be neat to be able to say that the Pope directed my thesis.” The word shocked is a strong word and yet it is mirrored in other reactions such as that of another priest in my diocese: “Those who know me know that my actions are not impulsive nor are my thoughts or words rash. And since many have asked what I think about our new Holy Father and perhaps seemed to receive no answer, I offer my thoughts, which can be grouped according to three responses of my mind and heart to the great surprise of Pope Francis’ election:

Nervous. When the announcement was made, I was very nervous just like the crowd’s response in St. Peter’s Square indicated. That nervousness comes from the unknown…knowing little to nothing about Pope Francis. I’m also nervous about him being a Jesuit. They have quite a record in contemporary times…and we’ve never had a Jesuit Pope. One of the main reasons for being nervous is because of my love for the Sacred Liturgy and all that has been done in recent years to reform and restore its reverence and authentic celebration. Finally I think I’m nervous because I am afraid of what could happen in terms of a hijacking…we can already see some folks interpreting his life, teaching, and ministry in a very shallow way and for their own purposes. In the final days of his pontificate, Benedict XVI said that this hijacking of the Second Vatican Council’s authentic teaching happened in the years that followed it because of the media and other certain modern theologians at the time and we’re just now able to see clearly the effects of that rupture.”

There was never any doubt about the fact that many Americans have indicated some shock and surprise and so have some around the world. My Facebook page has already seen me communicating with someone who has been a friend for many years and who informed me that he was Jesuit educated and had a soft place in his heart for the men that taught him and yet felt uncertainty about a Jesuit Pope. He felt that his Jesuit instructors had all been good men who fed his mind and prepared him very well for college but he was not sure that they were raching out effectively to him spiritually at that time. I have heard others say such things but they do not really reflect my own experience. I have known Jesuits in outreach to the disadvantaged, at universities and in the regular silent retreats I have made over the years but also as parish priests and in wider fields of work in the Missions and in growing dioceses. My friend educated by the Jesuits as a youth seems to have come to point of deciding that his feelings were almost all positive, stating: “I am definitely intrigued, he seems the best of both sides, a highly intellectual and committed spiritual man. I am also excited by the name he chose. St. Francis was charged with restoring the church back to its spiritual roots. What a great mission in these times of chaos and spiritual upheaval.”

Each Catholic must feel their way into this transition and much more so the Pope must make his way forward. I am not feeling at all well about my own immediate future and so it is easy to overlook the oromise that may be found in change. However, for American Catholics of the United States and for their neighbors in this country there are some more challenges associated with accepting and embracing the Papacy of the former Jorge Mario Cardinal Bergoglio S. J. He has reminded us along with other things which remind us of the complexity of a world often portrayed in simplistic terms. The Archbishop of Buenos Aires and not the Archbishop of New York, New Orleans, Los Angeles, Boston, Chicago or Miami will be the first Pope and we have to face the challenges of seeing what other sources of influence there are in our hemisphere. We must be able to communicate with the world and that is not always easy. China has never been well understood by the US government and business culture and has been through a great deal of change continuously for over one hundred and fifty years and that makes it harder to understand. An understanding of reiligion in China is not really a possible national goal unless a lot changes. The situation in Russia has changed from Soviet Atheism to a society where parents selct from a menu of religious instruction for their children. Those religious instruction options are Orthodox Christianity, Judaism, Islam or a sort of hybrid course offering a combination of religious history, secular ethics and civic morals. Britain has an official Church in each realm of the United Kingdom, Japan has a divine Emperor, Germany and France have numerous supports to religious frameworks unkown to us and they ones they reject are done so forcefully in socially demanding ways. This Pope is from an order of Catholic educators and has many opinions about them. He also knows that secular education without reference to religion is usually more likely to be of the COmmunist or Nazi totalitarian kind than certainly the very rare historically rare nihilism of American public school curricula. One wonders not only about what American families hear but also about what many parts of the world think about the complete lack of awareness of religious and ethical formation implicit in much of our way of doing things. To quote Obama’s most recent State of the Union Address:
“And that has to start at the earliest possible age. Study after study shows that the sooner a child begins learning, the better he or she does down the road. But today, fewer than 3 in 10 four year-olds are enrolled in a high-quality preschool program. Most middle-class parents can’t afford a few hundred bucks a week for a private preschool. And for poor kids who need help the most, this lack of access to preschool education can shadow them for the rest of their lives. So tonight, I propose working with states to make high-quality preschool available to every single child in America. That’s something we should be able to do.
Every dollar we invest in high-quality early childhood education can save more than seven dollars later on — by boosting graduation rates, reducing teen pregnancy, even reducing violent crime. In states that make it a priority to educate our youngest children, like Georgia or Oklahoma, studies show students grow up more likely to read and do math at grade level, graduate high school, hold a job, form more stable families of their own. We know this works. So let’s do what works and make sure none of our children start the race of life already behind. Let’s give our kids that chance.”

What about addressing the need to form people and families more properly at a level that can only be conceived in religious terms? America has many issues that need addressing. They are religious and familial and as a government advances its claims without real reigion and real family elements it is always destructive (although it may do some good as well). Some Americans are worried about a Pope who comes from the land of the Perrons, a place where Nazis have operated most broadly in the post World War Two Western Hemisphere and a land where ideological struggle has different spectra than it does in our country. I personally believe that Pope Francis is tied to many great ideas and institutions and has the influences even of people like me because of who he is and what he is that mitigate against any bad influences in his world and background. He is also a man with many admirable qualities. However, Americans Catholic and otherwise can rightly regret not having the first Pope from this hemisphere. But somehow we must wake up to the many ways in which we are moving ourselves out of most of the most important games in the world. It is not too late fro us to be truly great but it is getting too late. Too many questions are not even addressed and too many prices are not paid. We will fall behind places like Argentina more and mor eif we keep doing the things that are sapping our energy and strength…

Peacework and Wargames: The Visions We Share

It may be a sign of megalomania or of a lack of focus. But I do write notes and posts that sort of treat the whole world at a given moment. I am writing this note in that extremely ambitious scope of trying to see roughly where the world is right now. That is of course far too much to do in so few words. In addition to constraints of length it imposes too many demands of other kinds on me and on my readers. Yet I feel drawn and compelled to this attempt to glimpse the current state of the world. Once again I sort of want to set down where the world is just at this moment before Spring in 2013.
This is one of the more shapeless and rambling notes and blog posts which I occasionally write. The unifying theme among the motifs and issues discussed in this Facebook Note and Blog Post is simply that in late February of 2013 there is a relevance to me in each of the things I discuss here. In other words these are the things on my mind which I do not deem too personal, secret or trivial to include in something like this.

I am going to discuss four subjects and also try to interrelate them a little bit. These subjects are:

1. The legacy of Pope Benedict XVI and his role as a retired Pope.
2. The economic future of this country, my state and region and the world as these things relate to a few specific political and social issues.
3. The changing face of military power.
4. The 2013 Academy Awards Presentations and the State of the film industry.

It is perhaps possible to suggest a theme beyond time alone. These questions mostly arise at the same time but I am also looking at all of them from the point of view of awareness of fundamental things. It is not a trivial challenge for any group or institution to keep a correct and vital connection with the real dynamic roots and essential vital energies that keep it alive. I will be looking at how the Catholic Church, Hollywood, the US military and the economy are challenged to remain properly connected to their real energies…

There will be many developments over time which will reveal the real legacy of Pope Benedict XVI more completely than it can be revealed now. However, I think some things can be well understood already. He accomplished something very significant simply by being the second consecutive non-Italian Pope. Alone Pope John Paul II could have been an anomaly but two makes a pattern. There is also the fact that he was able to bring a great deal of experience from a broad sampling of pastoral and doctrinal problems to bear as he sought out the new evangelization and the new ecumenism. However, I think the greatest legacy of the recent pontificate in recent terms will be in the field of liturgy which in turn relates to Christian unity and other matters in a fairly direct way. I think including the Anglican use and the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite of the Mass have made the Church more Catholic and complete in ways that are really significant…
A relevant link to understand the role and significance of the extraordinary form can be found just below.

http://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/the-mass/extraordinary-form/

Benedict XVI has reminded the world’s Catholics of the richness of community which exists in the worship of the church. This are the liturgical Rites of the Catholic Church?

It has been no mystery to the Church leadership that three major groupings of Rites exist in the Catholic Church with one of them divided into what constitutes almost two major groupings. All the Cardinals in the Conclave are likely aware that from these four parent rites over twenty liturgical Rites (Western and Eastern) have developed which are in union with the Holy See. But for a large percentage of the majority of Roman Catholics these realites are remote enough. Many have little or no knowledge of worship beyond the Roman Rite. Practical fellowship in the many rites which in turn constitute the Antiochian Rite (Syria) and the Alexandrian Rite (Egypt) rarely occurs for most of them. The Byzantine Rite is only slightly better known and few know it derived derived as a major Rite from the Antiochian, under the influence of St. Basil and St. John Chrysostom. More freedom and harmony with these rites and with the Orthodox Christians to which they often relate in many ways was one of the goals of the Second Vatican Council. Things have improved in that regard over the last fifty years and Benedict XVI has made a contribution in that regard but his main effect on these matters has been indirect.

In much of the world the use of particular words in the Catholic mass may not seem very important and even the gathering of 115 men in red hats to elect a Pope may not seem significant. But the ritual is important, the voice is often heard and people know that the Pope is a leader of opinion and ideals for many with whom they currently share the planet. In a bit I will turn to the Academy Awards which also are a compelling ritual and also symbolize a powerful voice in the world and also are very much of interest to many people who would not have to be interested in them. It is easy for certain people to believe that political and economic news is more compelling than it is. Modern people tend to think that all the pageants of royalty and tribal politics were superfluous extras and that the modern era has got it right. But there is quite a bit of evidence that such rituals were vital to maintaining even a minimum of the healthier kind of interest in government. That same general area of evidence leads us to believe huge numbers of the wrong people are alienated and disconnected as regards much of the political and macroeconomic world. There are many among America’s strongest allies and worst enemies who see in the current and concurrently running second terms for Obama in the White House and for Ban Ki-Moon at the UN a season for steady progress for world peace and prosperity as well as opportunity for their own country’s progress. Russia is able to undertake key social and economic reforms as it grows into a new position, China builds up its military, North Korea is perfecting the atomic warhead and the ICBM and Brazil is flexing its regional economic muscle. In the United Kingdom there has emerged strong support from all major political parties for increased funding towards and the official establishment of the External Advisory Service in the EU as well as other initiatives by Europe to act as a single power able to make real progress on promoting peace and development in conflict-affected zones and fragile states.
The efforts of various powers around the world comes out in a context of enthusiasm by Europeans and Asia’s little dragons (the relatively small trading powers for foundations of a better world order. There is a context for such efforts which all nations have agreed to and in which famous Americans of means have played a major role. Ted Turner, Bill Gates and Warren Buffet among others have really made an impact in the efforts to give effect to the agreements which were reached under the term Millennium Development Goals. The millennium is well under way now and 2015 was a benchmark year in this plan so little discussed and reported in this country. About a billion of Earth’s people live in countries where the social, political and economic order is largely defined by repeated cycles of political and criminal violence. The Millennium Development Goals such as halving extreme poverty, providing universal primary (or elementary) school education and stopping the spread of AIDS have proven very difficult to achieve where multiple low grade civil wars are shaping the live of the poor and those seeking to interact with them. Largely because of violence which often has global dimensions the many millions in conflict are making little progress and no fragile state or conflict-affected region is likely to achieve a single Millennium Development Goal. The United Nations, the European Union and many other institutions clearly indicate that for these millions to progress their states must undergo structural change. Many countries with little chance of positive reform must develop more capable civic and state institutions, transform their security and justice sectors and be in a position to deal with various parties and factions long at war of one kind or another to bring about demobilization and reconciliation. These reforms would be necessary before the current world order would breathe life into weak economies and foster new relationships between the citizen and the state in each of these countries and nations. One cannot help but wonder if all the distance between these Goals and reality is just an accident or whether perhaps the order we currently live in does not support these goals at all.

However, the same powers that have sought these reforms sense that they are not succeeding as well as could be hoped. Britain’s Conservative political leaders and Prime Minister can smell and taste the geopolitical winds enough to feel the need for security and will consider spending considerable monies made available by this move for a stabilizing internationalism and an expansion of the UK’s aid budget to be used on more old fashioned kinds of military peacekeeping and even more purely conventional defense-related projects.
The UK which has quite a bit of experience building Empires is both really interested in a better world and really aware it must remain engaged in a world where China, Russia, new organizations and international Islamism or very much engaged. For each of these powers armed humanitarianism is part of the total world strategy Britain will not be left out and is allocating 30% of the UK aid budget to fragile and conflict-affected states. This development will involve some defense profile as well. The Brits have declared that their world strategies and interest are enhanced and their engagement effectiveness is improved when the Ministry of Defense, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Department for International Development work together, “sharing expertise while co-ordinating policy and strategy.”
In this complex world America has a government that does not draw up budgets, does not understand how to compare debt. Our public indebtedness is about one hundred trillion and not sixteen trillion dollars. It does not understand the international networks that can fuse and separate and has not really allocated sufficient resources to countering the kind of weapons postulated in the film Red Dawn which would take the whole internet off line, fry CPUs and jam communications simultaneously. We see the world adjusting to new patterns of reliance, we know carrier killer missiles with small warheads on mobile launchers can be rained down from space with amazing speed and we see that a new generation of projectiles hunt conventional rocketry more effectively than ever before but largely we do not adjust to these challenges but instead focus only on the lessons of recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. We see that our own social cohesion is under strain but really keep increasing the strain and not really securing the future and not thinking of what an American solution ought to be in deep terms.

I believe our models for economics and military projections are flawed badly. If we do not do a lot better soon there will be consequences. The solution does involve being alarmed but does not involve seeing the whole world as made up of full-fledged enemies. That approach would be one of many that would produce the same bad result. The result would be what?

The United States of America is moving towards a series of catastrophic military disasters. The country will awaken sooner or later to a future of having been entirely overrun by its enemies. The time for reform and appropriate action is quickly coming to an end.

Things are going to get a lot rougher than most people are prepared to deal with I fear. There is little else to say about the situation’s overall status and stature. There is a lot to say about what exactly I mean by that. However, for this note the short paragraphs above will have to do…

I now want to discuss the Oscars which I watched with interest on Sunday, February 24, 2013. The struggle for any kind of recognition this year was very intense. The year saw a lot of films that were at least of decent quality and many that had some ideas to work with as well.

I have not posted or written as much about the movies this year as I sometimes do. I did post a status after Dad and I went to see The Impossible in Abbeville one night. I also posted a review of Blood on the Bayou. I indicated similar things about both very different movies. I thought they were (on somewhat different scales) very good, solid picture and sound and well acted throughout. I also thought this was a great year for movies. The films seemed varied & excellent and on a year when I was able to go to more movies than I have in most recent years. It was also a year when I saw more movies than most but not all years of my life.

I have seen quite a few memorable movies in the last twelve months. The biggest one I missed was Amour. Other movies I have enjoyed were: Lincoln, Les Miserables, Zero Dark Thirty, Life of Pi, Silver Linings Playbook, Argo, Beasts of the Southern Wild (on DVD), Anna Karenina, Parental Guidance, The Cirque de Soleil Movie, Jack Reacher, The Hobbit, Blood on the Bayou, Django Unchained, Dark Knight Rises, Best Exotic Marigold Hotel, Atlas Shrugged Part Two, Skyfall, Hunger Games and Red Dawn. Then on DVD for previous years I saw for the first time Hugo and My Week with Marilyn. Movies besides Amour which I missed were Flight, The Master, Brave, Wreck-it Ralph and Moonrise Kingdom. However, I did see Moonrise Kingdom on DVD. I also thought the Twilight : Breaking Dawn Part Two did not deserve the Razzies but it was not the best even of that franchise. I was happy to see that Kristen Stewart held her head up at the Oscars and made a stunning presentation of herself after her Razzy as worst actress. The truth is I like The Avengers and the Hobbit and I did really like the Kristen Stewart and Charlize Theron work as well as most of the film titles Snow White and the Huntsman. The Twilight film joined with these films in selling a great deal of the popcorn and soda which along with the kids movies sales provide a place for all of us to watch the big screen filled with light.

Hollywood is a huge industry in America and it is our best claim to the kind of influence other people have a hard time stealing in a very competitive world. I support the movies by subscribing to Netflix, going to films and discussing them partly out of patriotic concern for a great American institution. But we all have our limits, I still chose not to see most of the movies that came out and I go to discount day matinees whenever possible. We live in a dangerous and intense world but sometimes the way we spend our leisure matters more than we might think. I thought this was a good year for a film with themes like those of Argo to be featured. I am glad it won best picture and hope we will use it and the other three political nominees Les Miserables, Lincoln and Zero Dark Thirty to remember that we cannot pretend governance doesn’t matter – it always does in the end.

The Papal Transition: Note Two, The Succession

by Frank Wynerth Summers III on Wednesday, February 13, 2013 at 11:35am ·
On March 1, 2013 the College of Cardinals will gather in Conclave with the hopes of electing a Pope by Easter. In this case they really mean by the end of the Lenten Season and before Holy Week. In addition, anything is possible. What can we hope for and look for in the conclave and in the new Pope who will emerge. What is possible is very broad. That is not because the Catholic Church is like the United States which has such low and small constitutional requirements for its head. Here we only require a Native Born Citizen over thrity five years of age elected by the Electoral College. In the church the minimum requirements are a baptized Christian who before being pope will be rightly ordained in the Priesthood and Episcopate within the true Apostolic Succession. But that line is abundant now and availalable and just as the US President has many legal and conventional requirements beyond the constitution so the Church has many qualifications it seeks and this goes back to the start of things when a Patriarchate was being filled for the first time.

First Chapter of the Acts of the Apostles verses fifteen and following describe a process: “In those days Peter stood up among the believers* (together the crowd numbered about one hundred and twenty people) and said, “….So one of the men who have accompanied us throughout the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us,beginning from the baptism of John until the day when he was taken up from us—one of these must become a witness with us to his resurrection.’So they proposed two, Joseph called Barsabbas, who was also known as Justus, and Matthias.Then they prayed and said, ‘Lord, you know everyone’s heart. Show us which one of these two you have chosen to take the place* in this ministry and apostleship from which Judas turned aside to go to his own place.’And they cast lots for them, and the lot fell on Matthias; and he was added to the eleven apostles.” The system has changed despite Petrine primacy, continuity, experince and other matters being important then and now. Th current Pope is not Judas and is not dead either but their will be saerch for qualified men of good character and a trust in the Holy Spirit to complete the process.

I have been distracted from this transition by the death of Austin Rivault. He has not only been killed but has been maligned as breaking into a pick-up truck which is hard to believe because of the season, the nearness to his own home and everything else about the case. His shooter has been accused of first degree murder and is perhaps in part a victim of the crime tolerance of our times. But is not excusable in large terms no matter what the facts may be. Austin was a neighbor whose story is told very differently by the father of another boy shot and not killed in the same incident. This man has said publicly and on Facebook that Austin and his two companions had been gathered with other friends at another friend’s house for a bit of a party just down the street after attending a Mardi Gras parade on Saturday. According to him Austin Rivault began to walk back to his home “a few blocks away.” His two companions borrowed a truck from the older brother of someone else at the party and started to drive Rivault home. They had slowed dwon and were almost home when they were shot according to this story. Austin is like all of us including those bing considered for Pope in that his and our reputations are all so fragile and susceptible to misunderstanding. But the chrurch has been sorting through men for this job for a long time. It seems trivial compared to Autin’s tragedy but I am also aware that someone from my hometown Antony Levine may have been on two Superbowl teams with the Packers and the recent Ravens with very little local press. The lack comes from the fact that he moved away before high school and is not in the sportswriters records. Nothing compared to the tragedy of Austin but a disappointment to his relatives. So too, the Cardinals will be prayerful, political, professional and have many points of view but they can only see a handful of candidtates as an entire conclave clearly and those have the best chances whether that seems fair or not. The Chruch is a part of our imperfect world.

The possibility of a Superior General from one of three major religious orders is perhaps more real than in several centuries. These non cardinals are not included in this very compressed note. It would signal a fairly radical shift in response to fairly grave challenges. This is one of the notes when I am tempted to leave aside personal commentary and the interweaving of personal experiences. However, although tempted I will probably eave this in with other stories nonetheless and make this a very personal sort of comment upon and analysis of these issues. I think the world gets pretty small near the top and a lot of people do connect with one another. I would not be surprised if the Pope were to do some writing and undertake some scholarship in the last years of his life that he could not involve himself with effectively as Pope. If that happens it will be related to material and concerns made more relevant and in a manner which has been inspired by the experiences of his papacy. I would not be surprised if the geopolitlics of our time had contributed to the abdication or resignation of the Pope. In the same way the conclave will occur the context of our time and the situation of the gathering Cardinals.

Radical Options that are not Impossible

A very qualified man among these extreme outsiders would be Father Adolfo Nicolás Pachón S.J., S.T.D. , The Superior General of the Society of Jesus who was born April 29, 1936 and is young enough to be a Pope of moderately long papacy. He is the leader of the Society of Jesus—the Roman Catholic religious order, also known as the Jesuits. As the largest male religious order of the Catholic Church, the Society of Jesus is present in virtually every country in the world, currently organized in roughly 100 Provinces and Regions. However they have a strong tradition of not contending for the Papacy from this unique position and there are countless other obstacles. However, in addition to being present to most local churches and cultures, the Society is an international body, and has always sought ways to strengthen our ministries via international collaboration through the close relationship between two Jesuit Provinces called twinning and the new development by the Society of Jesus of structures called Conferences which bring together Provinces in major geographical areas so that they might work together more effectively. With a huge presence in the Roman Curia and this expertise in dealing with many of the issues facing the Church around the world the COnclave could make a radical choice and elect the Most Reverend Adolfo Nicolás, S.J. who is generally addressed as Father General but whose position has long carried the nickname of Black Pope, after his simple black priest’s vestments, as contrasted to the white garb of the Pope. Father Adolfo Nicolás Pachón, S.J., S.T.D. is a Spanish priest of the Roman Catholic Church. He is I believe the thirtieth (although I find some contradictory documentation) Superior General of the Society of Jesus serving since 2008. Pachon was born in Villamuriel de Cerrato, Palencia, and entered the Society of Jesus or the Jesuits, in 1953 in the novitiate of Aranjuez. He studied at the University of Alcalá, there earning his licentiate in philosophy, until 1960, whence he first traveled to Japan and became familiar with Japanese language and culture. Nicolás entered Sophia University in Tokyo, where he studied theology, in 1964, and was later ordained to the priesthood on March 17, 1967. From 1968 to 1971, he studied at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, earning their doctorate in theology. Returning to Japan, Fr. Nicolás became professor of systematic theology at his alma mater of Sophia University, teaching there for the next thirty years. He was Director of the East Asian Pastoral Institute at the Ateneo de Manila University, in Quezon City, Philippines, from 1978 to 1984. It was during those years that my father and I studied in a special intensive scripture residential seminar called “Scripture Ventures” which is not in the official registrar’s definition of an EAPI or Ateneo de Manila course but which had a number of significant scholars and faculty from both of those institutions. I also knew many Jesuits in that relatively small world of the Province of Manila. He moved on to Japan not so far off from the time my family temporarily dug up all its roots in the Philippines, Fr. Nicolás and later served as rector of the theologate in Tokyo from 1991 to 1993, when he was appointed Provincial of the Jesuit Province of Japan. Nicolás remained in this post until 1999, and then spent four years doing pastoral work among poor immigrants in Tokyo

Other radical options will not get a biographical sketch here. These radical choices would come from a Western or Eastern general direction. In the Western version besides the Black Pope these options would involve choosing a cleric who is not a cardinal from another large order that has a female sister order and a lay order or from the network that has grown up between the Legionaires of Christ and the Opus Dei movement and institutions. In the Eastern direction I think it is possible that the Conclave would elect a bishop from on of the Eastern rites whether titled bishop or an analgous episcopal rank. Such a man would have patored married priests and while married priests cannot become bishops in the Eastern rites or in their Orthodox Communion counterparts the Conclave would probably gor for one of the rare widowed bishops. However, a prominent Eastern rite widowed bishop in the Roman Catholic Church is only slightly less rare than a unicorn. But this would be a real form of engagement with a whole set of sexual, ecumenical, women’s and geopolitical issues which would show the kind of strength of purpose which elected John Paul II in his time.

One of the valuable aspects of an interregnum is that it reminds us of the uncertainty of most things. Mainly we do not know what will happen next and that is a valuable thing to remember. However, there are very slim chances that any of the routes delineated above will be followed.

The Main Chance

I would say the odds are ninety percent that the next Pope will be a Roman rite cardinal. That is my calculation although not everyone on the list that follows is a cardinal. If I had to guess, I would say the odds are above fifty percent (and could be as high as ninety percent that the next Pope currently goes under one of the following names and titles Peter Kodwo Appiah Cardinal Turkson, Marc Cardinal Ouellet, Francis Cardinal Arinze, Gaudencio Cardinal Rosales, Angelo Cardinal Scola, Oscar Cardinal Rodriguez Maradiaga, Wilfred Fox Cardinal Napier, Dionigi Cardinal Tettamanzi, Timothy Cardinal Dolan, Tarcisio Cardinal Bertone, Angelo Cardinal Bagnasco, Jorge Mario Cardinal Bergoglio, Archbishop Raymond Burke, Norberto Cardinal Rivera Carrera, Archbishop Gianfranco Ravasi, Leonardo Cardinal Sandri, Claudio Cardinal Hummes, Odilo Cardinal Scherer, Camillo Cardinal Ruini, Christoph Cardinal Schoenborn, Ivan Cardinal Dias, Francisco Javier Cardinal Errazuriz Ossa, Cardinal William Levada, George Cardinal Pell,
or Monsignor Pietro Parolin, Thomas Stafford Cardinal Williams.

Arinze and Turkson are black Africans and it may not be the election in which they have enough votes in that direction. Race is a barrier that cuts both ways and this is Arinze’s last real chance. Francis Cardinal Arinze is 80 years old and is well respected in his native Nigeria. He has many ties to the Curia and has spent 25 years in the Vatican and is known as being conservative enough to please some who would not want to be tainted with any leftist or liberal influence and yet because he is from Africa Arinze may also get support from liberal cardinals who want to see the next pope come from the developing world, especially Africa with its 176 million Catholics, with Arinze’s Nigeria having 20 million practicing Catholics. But this is likely to be diluted by those willing to settle for a bishop from Latin America or to hope Turkson comes in later after another Pope.

Dolan is an American and a real long-shot because of this but it will also make him part of the conversation. Williams is too old now and from a very obscure area of the world as a New Zealander which is both new, somewhat isolated and not a Catholic country but he remains a pastor with numerous reasons to appeal to those looking for another brief pontificate as he has many of the ideal qualities of a caretaker Pope. Burke, Parolin, and Ravasi are not cardinals and are overshadowed by men who have the red hat as well as comparable records.

That means that for me the papabili in this note are as follows: Ouellet, Rosales, Scola, Maradiaga, Napier, Tettamanzi, Bertone, Bagnasco, Bergoglio, Carrera, Sandri, Hummes, Scherer, Ruini, Schoenborn, Dias, Ossa, Levada, or Pell. I guess that there is between a thirty and seventy percent chance in my own analysis as I type this that one of these men will be Pope. Does the Church want to go back to an Italian at this point? That is important. I think there will be a strong push for an Italian and if Scola’s supporters get in front of that push it may well be him. Of these Rosales may be the weakest and on the verge of being an outsider but he brings the most unique support with a large Catholic country in East Asia and the Western Pacific behind him. So let us get back to him after looking at the most likely contenders.

Cardinal Scola may be the overall front runner and is an Italian who was born in Malgrate, Lombardy, to Carlo Scola, a truck driver, and Regina Colombo. He was the younger of two sons his elder brother died in 1983. Scola attended high school at the Manzoni Lyceum in Lecco, and there he participated in Gioventù Studentesca(Student Youth). He studied philosophy in Italy at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart from 1964 to 1967, obtaining his doctorate with a dissertation on Christian philosophy. He was a Vice-President and thereafter President of the Milanese diocesan chapter of the Federazione Universitaria Cattolica Italiana, the university student wing of Catholic Action. He continued his studies at the Saronno and Venegono seminaries in Milan and was ordained a priest in July 1970 in by Bishop Abele Conigli of Teramo-Atri. Later Scola completed a second doctorate in theology from the University of Fribourg in Switzerland where his dissertation treated the works of St. Thomas Aquinas. An active collaborator and the Italianlanguage editor of the journal Communio founded by Henri de Lubac, Hans Urs von Balthasar, and Joseph Ratzinger ( who became Pope Benedict XVI). His ministry has included pastoral work, service as Assistant Professor of Fundamental Moral Theology and after 1982 an appointment as Professor of Theological Anthropology at the Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family in Rome and Professor of Contemporary Christology at the Pontifical Lateran University. Prior to this he had also studied elsewhere in Europe and done research in the acadmic posts he hled as well as publishing influential journals. All this came to a focus for him in Rome. There he founded an academic institution called the Studium Generale Marcianum, and published the journal Oasis, published in Italian, English, French, Arabic and Urdu to support Christians in the Muslim world. Scola has also the stamp of orthdoxy as well as intellect having served the Roman Curia as consultor to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. His globalism and missionary credentials are also extant despite the ivory tower life in that at the various schools where he taught he helped to establish bursaries to enable foreign students, often from the “third world” dioceses, to study in Italy.

But the Italian vote may split among many strong leads. The second wave will divide among Ouellet, Napier, Hummes, Scherer, Schoenboern and Pell. If one of these groups of votes gathers momentum one of them will be elected. I will give a sketch of the biography of two of these men.

Odilo Pedro Scherer, would be another Tetuon as well as bringing in the New World as he is a German-Brazilian born in Cerro Largo, Rio Grande do Sul, to Edwino and Francisca (née Steffens) Scherer, and is a distant relative of the late Cardinal Archbishop of Porto Alegre Alfredo Scherer. The family of his father orginated from Theley (Tholey) and his mother German roots go to Saarland. Odilo Pedro Scherer completed minor and major seminary studies in Curitiba and studied at the Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná and the Pontifical Gregorian University (from where he obtained his Doctorate of Sacred Theology in 1991) in Rome. He was ordained a priest by Archbishop Armando Círio, OSI, on December 7, 1976. His educational experiences remind us other front runners.Administration and teaching venues have included the diocesan seminary of Cascavel (1977–1978), the diocesan seminary of Toledo (1979–1982, 1993), and the Centro Interdiocesano de Teologia de Cascavel (1991–1993), the Ciências Humanas Arnaldo Busatto (1980–1985), the Instituto Teológico Paulo VI (1985) and the Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná until 1994.

There was ordinary pastoral work interspersed through these years as well and he has seen that brought to fruition. On November 28, 2001, Scherer was appointed Auxiliary Bishop of São Paulo and Titular Bishop of Novi. He received his episcopal consecration on February 2, 2002 from Cardinal Cláudio Hummes, OFM, along with two co-consecrators. He has shown collegial and professional appealmade Secretary General of the Brazilian Episcopal Conference in 2003. This builds on ties to the center which he established when from 1994 to 2001, he was an important official of the Congregation for Bishops in the Roman Curia and after being elevated to Cardinal on June 12, 2008, in addition to his main duties he was appointed by Benedict as a member of the Congregation for the Clergy. On January 5, 2011 he was appointed among the first members of the newly created Pontifical Council for the Promotion of the New Evangelisation. This is crucial to the Church’s understanding of these times.

However, there is a North American who is also well-known and popular among the Bishops and Cardinals of Latin America. There is little doubt that he would directly confront the issues in the newspapers and would be a very accessible Pope for many in the United States of America, the Francophone world and the British Commonwealth as well. He would probably be in the English secular press more often than any other man who became Pope. He cares about the issues the mainstream media care about and disagrees with most of them on most of the issues they care about. For many American Catholics he would seem a lifeline.

This hockey-playing, former small-town boy from Quebec became one of Canada’s three cardinals and has at least once predicted that the next pontiff could come from Latin America. In addition to this Canadian media have several times quoted him as saying that he doesn’t want the job because its heavy responsibilities would be “a nightmare.” Yet, from the moment he knelt to kiss John Paul II’s ring and was elevated to the College of Cardinals, many among the knowledgable and those who wish to be thought knowledgeable have speculated openly that Marc Ouellet could assume the Throne of St. Peter. This has only increased since Benedict XVI announced on Monday that his own pontificate is ending. The Quebecois is erudite and speaks five languages, is a relatively young and vigorous 68-year-old Cardinal Ouellet whose missionary and global credits have been earned as a seminary teacher in Colombia. He marries all this New World connectivity with the respectable record of a professor of theology as well as the pastoral care experience of an archbishop in Quebec who never his from from controversy. These are all crowned by the Curia connection of working as a Vatican insider principally responsible for the largest roles in the selection of bishops.

The next development might well be a three headed wave towards one of the other Italians, Rosales or Dolan. If that third wave reconclies on one they could win it. If this does not produce a Pope then there will be a real discussion of everyone on this list, Superiors General and anyone who showed unlikely promise. If there is still no Pope then I think Williams has a chance as do several others…

Gaudencio Borbon Cardinal Rosales (born August 10, 1932) succeeded Jaime Cardinal Sin in 2003 andwould add to other handicaps having retired and been followed in office by Luis Antonio Cardinal Tagle in 2011. Tagle would doubtless support him if he was drafted as would the vast Filipino network in the church and some of the rest of Asia. He has experience as Metropolitan of the ecclesiastical province of Manila, de facto Primate of the Philippines, Archpriest of Manila Cathedral. Rosales was the fourth native Filipino Archbishop of Manila, following centuries of Spanish and Irish-American episcopacy.Rosales is not a white EUropean but for people who long for an aristocratic background in the Pope and can overlook exact color and ethnicity he could have some appeal that has not been recently satisfied he was born in Batangas City, Batangas that few have heard of but was always born to the obligations of gentle birth.. Rosales’ grandfathers were Julian Rosales, a former mayor of the town of Batangas and Pablo Borbon, a former governor of Batangas province. Rosales’ father, Dr. Godofredo Dilay Rosales, was one of the first Filipino physicians to acquire his medical school and residency training exclusively in the United States of America, after which he returned home to practice in Batangas City. Rosales’ mother, Remedios Mayo Borbón, was the first cousin of the great Filipino nationalist, Claro M. Recto who is a towering figure in their homeland. He is the third of 7 siblings. He studied theology at the San Jose Seminary, and had as classmates two other future bishops: Bishop Severino Pelayo, former bishop of the military ordinariate, and Bishop Benjamin Almoneda, former bishop of Daet, Camarines Norte. On March 23, 1958, he was ordained priest by Bishop Alejandro Olalia, and then assigned to teach for 11 years in the seminary of the Archdiocese of Lipa. He was a widely acclaimed parish pastor in a country where parish pastors are important. He was the first bishop of the regular dicoese of Malaybalay and that transition from a prelature is hard to reproduce. I knew him in those days. He has entertained and received a Papal visit to the Philippines. HeHe represents very rich connections in an important national and regional church community.

I have decided to leave Dolan’s sketch out because so many of my readers are Americans and there are better sketches available and he is on our media. He is also learned, a pastor, affable and well connected. If it gets to Williams and Rosales it could also get to him.

Please do not say I promised one of these sketched men will be Pope I have not. In addition, the cardinals will not admit that a process similar to the one I have described occurred even if it does occur. But the thoughts won’t do us any harm. They are also part of the process… Untill the Conclave starts rumours can even have a little influence.

The Papal Transition: Note One, The Incumbent by Frank Wynerth Summers III on Monday, February 11, 2013 at 10:14am

 Our Holy Father and Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI has announced that he will resign his post. The first pope to resign or abdicate in 600 years. The reason given is in my opinion the only really permissible reason in terms of what might be called constitutional theology. Let us pray for this Pope and the next.  I posted a status on Facebook and Tweeted about this as well as submitting a simple ammendment to a pertinent section of Wikipedia. This is a very big story and I am going to discuss some of the issues, thoughts and concerns which are raised by this action of the High Patriarch of the West, Bishop of Rome and Successor to the throne of Saint Peter.

I do not want to pretend this brief note will amount to much in terms of the overall scope of assessing the Pope, his papacy and the possibilities of the coming Conclave.

Josef Ratzinger, His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI will be remembered among other things as:

the second consecutive Patriarch of Rome, Bishop of Rome and Supreme Pontiff and Successor to the Throne of St. Peter who has not been an Italian and that (without saying the Italians are not agreat people and without saying that Bishops ought mostly to come from their own lands or related lands) is a good thing. It would probably be good if about half of all Popes were Italian over time but I would not want to see dozens of Popes in a row who were not Italian so everyone must do the best they can. He is a German who fought in the regular nonpolitical part of the German forces doing his duty in World War II and is a very accomplished scholar. However, the service to any state headed by Adolf Hitler and his lunatics is a blemish on the Papacy. But the Papacy has had many blemishes — nonetheless I do not lay all the blame on him personally but I do hold it against him. He remembers the insanity of Nazi political religion and although his experience was more ambiguous than he admits he will work to see that the liturgy and practice of the Church draws forth a milieu such as produced Mozart, the Bach family and the Gothic Cathedrals. If he could say anything kind and honest to the Jews in the way of professional advice and have it received he would advise them to invest in their worship and liturgy to reach and surpass the heights of the Temple’s musical past.

Pope Benedict XVI will be remembered as having to at once to contend with a very broad spectrum of issues and demands and has brought to bear his talents as a writer, thinker and organizer as well as his prodigious mental capacities. He, like everyone on who achieves a great and high office is both empowered and sometimes trapped by who he is an by the experiences he brings to this office. This Pope before and after coming into the Throne of Saint Peter has written about Jesus Christ in a very compelling way and has sought to bring the Christ of Faith, the Jesus of History and the Jesus Christ of Cultural Developments into a proper and good focus centered around the Jesus revealed in the Gospels. This is certainly a worthy goal and it fits in the larger context of a body of work.

His resignation was within the lines of discipline, cold logic and control which have typified him. This Pope has specifically struggled with that German Teutonic impulse towards the struggle of the spiritual and the State which has always been pronounced but which which has been agonizingly disfunctional since the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. He has also sought to maintain the right balance of life ethics and other aspects of the Christian ethic. That has been challenging and his resignation addresses those issues as well. It is true I did not rejoice at his election but he has done a good job and it is unlikely I will be happier with the next Pope.

My next note will be about the Conclave and Papbili..

Will write a note about this soon…

The Remains of the Future: A copied Facebook Note

Four Parts of Time

For the purpose of this Note and Blog Post I am looking at time and the related qualities of chronology or change as being composed of four parts. These four parts are the past, the present, the future and eternity. Eternity really does not concern us directly in this Note and is mostly a religious word and concept for most people but it is the base and fundament overarching all time and enduring with little change. Many scientists do not believe in eternity but there is plenty of evidence for it in the experiments and writing of these same scientists. It may not exactly be the eternity of Christian Systematic theology but is close enough to deserve the use of the term eternity. Not all that is somehow involved in the flow of time is consumed or transformed thereby. Eternity is not my topic — the future is my topic.

I have written a lot of feature articles and sports stories which have been published and include partial biographies of one or more people. I have alsoread agreat number of biographies of people living and dead. I just read Penny Junor’s book Prince William: The Man Who Will be King and in recent weeks have read parts of bigraphies of George Washington and Peter the Great as well as a biographical novel about Julius Ceasar. I have edited early drafts of my mother’s memoirs earned a Master of Arts Degree in History which involved a lot of biographical reading and some writing of that type. These are only a few of the reasons why I think of many things in terms of a human lifetime. I am in this very Note writing yet another bit of autobiography as I have often done before. What does the human life teach us about the future?

Prince William’s book is about the life he has lived up untill the recent past in the glaring light of his expected future responsibilities. His life involves studies, friendships, deaths, military training and service and a love affair of interest to millions. He seems to me as well secured in his line of work as almost anyone else. I will say that and also remember that there are many who dislike he and his mother for their common touch, his father for his imperious qualities and the whole family for their expenses. But the real solidity of his life must be kept in mind when I return to discussing him below. He is a busy man doing things that matter all day long on many days.

Once someone is dead we can look at their life as a time ray. From conception or birth to death they had a certain amount of time for the biological and bigraphical contiuum of life as we all are experiencing regardless of how one feels or what one believes about what came before or after that continuum. During that entire continuum of time the present stayed some undefinable protion of life which was more or less constant whether we think of it as an instant, a minute, an hour, a day or a week. The past kept increasing. The quantity which kept diminishing as they traveled forward on this timeline was the future. Most of them were more or less aware of this fact. All of us alive today know that this portion of the universe which constitutes the future in our ordinary lives is ever diminishing untill it disappears from the point of view of a future historian ( or some such observer). But there are of course other points of view.

We all either know someone who has dodged death at close range or have done so and some of us have done so many times or at least more than once. Those points are times when from the point of view on the continuum the future had shrunk to a very tiny resource and then suddenly expanded again. Those who have children also feel connected to the future beyond their own mortality in a different way than they did before they had children. Others find some semblance of this extension of the living future in books they have published or which have been published about them buildings with their names on them, scrapbooks worth passing down to their relatives and even medals, prizes and awards for which good records are kept..

President Barack Hussein Obama has never written a book which can be in very simplistic terms called a memoir or an autobiography but he has written two books with significant biographical elements. Both
Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance and The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream are in many ways the story of his life and associated family history in two installments. I have not read every single word of either book and no longer recall how close I got to reading every single word. Many people review books having read far less than I have read of these books but I do not like to do that. It is no secret that I dislike Obama. However, I may know the gist of what his books say without knowing their precise import and proposed policy as regards many issues. I think that he wrote about his past very much with an eye to his future. I think that while a small percentage of voters read his books the books had a big impact on his becoming President as did books by Jimmy Carter’s semi-autobiography help his chances. This shift to biographies before the Presidency is perhaps not the norm but quite a fewh ave been written after the Presidency and outside of the topic of biographical writing Jefferson was President in no small part because he wrote the Declaration of Independence and Madison because he wrote many things, possibly including partial drafts of the US Constitution and also many of the Federalist Papers. Even those writings that are not biographies show a capacity to sustain the continuity of prose.

It is possible I will publish my own memoirs some day. However, I already appear in tow such books I did not author and which are told of the life I shared from another point of view. Those are the books by my mother Go You are Sent: An Incredible Odyssey of Faith and Our Family’s Book of Acts: To Love and Serve the Lord in which are told many events enfolded in real themes of my own life. In addition my brief biography has appeared in various newspapers and magazines in varying degrees of brevity and accuracy on a few occasions. For me my perception of my own life is compsed pretty equally of three parts. Those parts are my feeling about my past, my current sense of well-being and my expectations for the future. These all interact and then while eternity is the longest period it is a minority of my assessment of my life and that is on principle. Perhaps I would fraction evaluation and feelings about my life as 28% past, 30% present, 31% future and 11% eternity. If something really good were to happen it would improve my view of the future and my evaluation of the past it would not only enhance my enjoyment of the present. Currently I find the projection of my short, long and indefinite term future so bad that it drags the whole view of my life into the really unappealing category. I am not suggesting I would change a lot of what I have done. I knew I was taking risks and the nature of risk is that one may lose. For me the outcome of my life has been in many ways horrible but I do not fault the journey all that much. Nonethless, it is a journey I had hoped would be more rewarding.

In the unhappiness and relative gloom of my life as it is there is time to try to set out my records and I am easily able to do this in partial and incomplete ways. My eager and total willingness to take the chances and do the work have produced a life that can on the one hand be mediocre and at the same time feel really unendurable and yet I have probably rebuilt my health this year to have more to endure. But as I live out the decades of hell to which I am condemned I have the chance to set out the record of my past on my Linked-In profile and in other places. I have gotten in better shape and it is doubtful that misery alone will soon produce the massive heart attack which could have been a near and convenient way out. The futures lade out before me mostly fall into a set of patterns that I hate so very much. Yet I feel that I must husband and care for my future no matter how distasteful it is and that is because the future is a resource.

Supply of the Future

I have lived a life of many brushes with a very foreshortened future. That being the case I have also known the joy of having a very short life expectancy suddenly turn into a much longer one. Yet, despite all of this there is the ongoing and continuous sense that the future is disappearing. In the context of trying to do a number of things which require a great deal of time one has a growing sense of life’s impossibilities. I am far more aware on a daily basis of what I will certainly not do than I am aware of anything that I may yet do. It is not so easy to decide what choices to make when one reaches the point where most of the most important options have been foreclosed and one is still alive to face the future. If one still has significant internal resources but has taken a sufficient number of riscks and labored a sufficeient number of hours that one feels he or she should be either checked out completely or in a place one finds more suitable.

In my list of the hundred most watchable people for the second post 9-11 decade I included among others myself, Hu Jintao, Osama Bin Laden, Prince Charles, Prince William and his wife the Duchess of Cambridge. I am feeling pretty low and many will argue that Hu Jintao is no longer watchable. Bin Laden is watched on screens around the country and abroad in the film Zero Dark Thirty. I still think that both Hu Jintao and I have some influence and significance which transcends our absence from the headlines. However, the Prince of Wales and the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are much in the news, much in the writings of biographers and are very active in the wok which involves many millions of people in the Commonwealth and Europe as well as elsewhere. I read the Junor book with interest. However, it is not impossible that their time in the limelight will be cut short. I think the British Monarchy is fairly secure but the law has been changed to allow the daughters of sovereigns to inherit even if they have brothers. This has not disenfranchised Prince Charles but refers to the the daughters of William and Catherine, Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. However, the Prince of Wales has many critics. Britain’s history is far more volatile than is imagined and it is not inconceivable that Princess Anne and her line will replace her more celebrated and troubled brother and his line. Nobody is discussing this as a real likelihood in the main. But if it happened the future would change for a great number of people. The King Edward who married the American Mrs. Simpson had no children and Prince Charles has sons born to the daughter of an Earl. The differences between them are enormous.

Defining the Future

With my camera missing and many reverses in my life and having wasted a great deal of time and energy on getting ready for possibly re-entering graduate school I find that my future is amorphous and unpleasant in a greater degree than before although it has long been so for me. But I am aware that as long as I live I will have to define it. I am not alone in needing to define the future, as a nation America is in need of seriously defining its future. It is in fact doing that. Nonetheless, not just any definition will do. I am not happy with the definitions we are creating and have written a great deal about those definitions and my own unhappiness with them. My unhappiness about the future of the country frames and completes my personal unhappiness. I will proceed into what remains of the future with what resolve I can muster. I will likely do it with no less nor more enthusiasm than I often have. However, while I am alive I will have future to contend with and so will everyone else.

A Changing America and the LHSAA Split: A Copied Facebook Note

by Frank Wynerth Summers III on Tuesday, January 29, 2013 at 2:39pm ·
This is going to be another of my more rambling sorts of Facebook Notes. There are always so many things that one could blog about. These note do become blog posts and are in exxence blog posts here on my Facebook profile. I really couls do a post ont new immigration policy and on the confirmation of John Kerry. There is nothing about my life which is preventing me from doing a long blog on my personal life and the extreme anti-climax of my efforts to make a change which began in earnest in August. I could of course wotk the theme of splitting into those events as well. Splitting and joining are constantly happening in sexual relations, cell reproduction, stocks and forms of ownership. However, I am not going to dea with quite such a wide net or use quite such a broad canvas. An odd sort of encyclopedia could no doubt be written and organized around that double principle. This will be a rambling roundup sort of piece but not one devoid of all structure. The bulk of the note is about a handful of topics.

I am going to discuss the Civil War and related topics as they have been portrayed, studied and depicted into various communications and artistic media of out current and what they have to say about splittling the USA back in the middle of the nineteenth century. I will briefly discusss Hillary Clinton’s split with the Obama administration. Also my attention will turn to tthe national divide over abortion. But my Note will center on the recent split of the High school football playoff system in the State of Louisiana. Somewhere in all that I will discuss some splitting in my own life past, present and future. What this them has to do with the life and society my readers experience remains to be seen.

I think that the real possible advantage to the new playoff system is that perhaps the charter schools, magnet schools, private schools, parochial schools and various academies in the state will form more real and significant bonds. Meanwhile the public schools are already joined by many bonds of administration, funding, standards and hundreds of other things. Thus this may be a way for the select public schools to act as a bridge while maintaining the distinct quality of both the public and the private schools. In my view that could be a very good result. However, the great advantage to the current system is that while all types of schools are different from one another in many ways they all meet in equal contests based on the number of students enrolled and this unites the students and preserves a since of the larger society. However, the changes are coming about because of the injustice of the current system and not my view of a possible benefit in bridging distinct classes of autonomous schools. Schools that cannot recruit face schools that can and believe it is impossible for them to compete at the highest levels. The topfew recruiters are the most dominant schools of that type on the gridiron. The new system will end that fundamental difference between people expected to meet in contest on the field.

I have mixed feelings about a change in the high school football structure of competition in my home state of Louisiana. The Louisiana schools will be divided now into two groups. The largest group of schools will be public schools which receive less than 25% of their students from any admission system other than territorial lines. The other group will include all schools that are not public schools and all public shools which receive 25% or more of their students from an enrollment system outside of the resdents of their territorial enrollment site. In Louisiana many small Catholic and other private schools recruit very little if at all and draw from their own civil parishes almost entirely. These divisions which are like the counties of other states are also the basis of most school districts and school board regions of operation in the state. This is not the only issue involved however.

I used to work at The Daily Advertiser in Lafayette. I wrote sports there and my supervisor was Assistant Sports Editor Kevin Foote. He and I worked briefly together on the Vermilion when we attended USL, which is now UL, as well. He has written an interesting editorial about the splitting of the Louisiana High School Athletic Association. I realize this does not have the relevance to the lives of many of my readers that it might to the average reader of he Daily Advertiser. But I do think it is important. It is part of the evolution of America. Here is a link to Kevin’s article: http://www.theadvertiser.com/article/20130126/HSSPORTS/301260328/Make-splitting-headache?nclick_check=1 If the link does not work in this text you should be able to past it into your browser.

Splitting is part of the human condition. The political and organizational processes of lumping together and splitting apart are crude and limited portions of the larger forces which we saw joining and dividing everything around the universe. There is no question that the LHSAA was a unique part of the overall complex of institutions in the state where things are usually pretty well divided between private schools and public schools. I am hoping to split from here myself. It is hard for public schools which rely only on students from their districts to compete with schools which draw athletes from all over. There are a few schools like perhaps John Curtis and Evangel and mostly Evangel which really recruit a great deal and have done so with no effort to make it palatable to anyone else. However, these are not simple questions and challenges.

I favor a vast amount of reshuffling and rearranging which would involve all kinds of splitting. In time this will become even less likely than it is now. Unless of course that great reshuffling should occur soon. In my own life the splitting away from particular people and places has been a big theme because of all the traveling that I have done. The splitting apart of my marriage was certainly a major and mostly bad event and process. But splitting from one situation has inevitably led to new opportunites and new eventualities that I could not experience before or during some new division. For me there is a limited value in lessons from my own life because in many ways my life has brought me to a position far worse than any of the difficult situation that I overcame in my life’s journey to reach this point. Yet I have achieved a lot of good things I could not have achieved without the various breakups along life’s path.

I saw Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama’s joint interview with Steve Croft. It seemed to me that they had worked a hard road together in pursuit of Democratic Party unity. That long path of transcending conflict, seeking opportunity for collaboration and other such things had certainly had mixed results from every point of view and now they are leaving that behind. They made it clear that they are not renouncing it and aremerely moving to the next chapter. But the fact remains that Obama will be in office for four more years and Kerry or someone else will be Secretary of State and not Clinton. Despite the fact that she had seemed very likely to leave before Benghazi some will say she was fired over that crisis or quit because of it.

Sometimes people and paths forward simply divide. The film Lincoln is set in the period at the end of Lincoln’s life but it reviews the factors that led to the split of the Union in the late 1850’s and early 1860’s. This is a pretty good and thoughtful movie overall. The neo-gothic festival of violence which is Django Unchained deals with many of the same issues as Lincoln but does little to discuss growing sectional conflict prior to the war between the States. Both of these films are vastly more realistic in tone than the mash-up Abraham Lincon Vampire Slayer which was taken as a kind of emotional truth by some in its audience. These films are more than the number usually available for audiences seeking to make sense of the greatest of several divisions in America and her history.

Obama had spoken much about unifying the nation in his first campaign. Perhaps it is as divided as ever in my lifetime. The March for Life in Washington DC is as little understood as ever by many and so are a good number of bills and social proposals which are excoriated in one state and well-loved in another. Federalism is a system which allows diverse and different people to interact well. Sometimes it has to be retuned and reconfigured. I have proposed that sort of thing for the country and the LHSAA has proposed it for its member schools.

There are good reasons to be concerned about what the bad effects could be of isolating Catholic schools and public shools from one another in Acadiana. If that is the effect it will be an unfortunate one. But I think there can be a good outcome as well. In my life I have proposed many changes to the way the country is governed and they connect with my own sense of discontent and alienation in a number of ways. They are not likely to be adopted but the problems they address are real enough. It is also true that the problems the LHSAA seeks to address are real enough. Sometimes we have to split things apart to make them both better. Often that does not work out as well as people would have hoped. But it is a reasonable strategy.
We need to recognize when such divisions are unavoidable. I have realized that I could probably do better to leave but that I may not have another departure in me. I have given far more than I could afford to this social context in which I fund so little nourishment now. The internal split has occurred and there may nbot be the right energies for the other split to come off well.

America today may see many more calls for divisions. Many states have active petitions for Secession from the Union. Although such action is unlikely the call will have some effect. People will be trying to find separate structures that are not vulnerable to what they see as a bad central force. We all have our views about what kinds of splitting are useful. I find that there are a vast number of divides between me and many others which I had hoped to avoid until they happened. However, while I may remember a life in which I often sought unity that is not all I sought. Like many others I sought individual and group autonomy. I have sought justice and liberty.

The schools in the LHSAA are mostly defined by what is built in schools and small groups of schools. That is good. Most of the schools have ties to to other schools not in the LHSAA. However, they have found a need to divide themselves as regards an important function. They cannot walk together as they have and as they seem to liley to do without change. I hope the USA will not split apart again and even more that it will not do so in my lifetime. I have not trouble saying that and honoring the Confederate legacy. The issues are different and the history is different now. In addition, the CSA was more or less a last resort. However, the LHSAA has found a way to hold together by dividing a part of itself in a certain way. I think that America will need to make some new divisions in the next twenty years or else either the UNION as unity or the UNION as society witll fail. In my model constitutions I have proposed some changes. But other changes may occur. The current state of affairs is getting less and less tenable.

Road Map to Barack Hussein Obama’s Second Term: A Facebook Note

.by Frank Wynerth Summers III on Wednesday, January 23, 2013 at 1:13pm ·.
President Barack Hussein Obama has begun his second term in office. When he was inaugurated the first time things were close to flawless as far as spectacle goes. Nobody in the mainstream media questioned whether YoYo Ma and Yitzak Perlman should have played air guitar on their cell and violin. The historic event was covered as a good thing from almost every point of view by almost everybody although there was so much bad about his background, record and associations from so many points of view. This year people have noted that his record is not perfect and it is hard not to notice the troubles in the world and the country after four years. People can argue about roots and causes but this is no utopia nor paradise he has brought us into. Beyonce may have lip-synched or lip synced and that seems to matter to some people. Katy Perry was found to have large breasts in front of children and that might not be perfect. The Islamic dressed looking First Daughters outfits are universally extolled. Today, on the 23rd we have Secretary of State Clinton finally testifying about Bengazi. The endless parade of emotional discussions in this “no drama” Presidency continues.

He gave his Inaugural Address starting at 11:55 A.M. EST on the gallery and extended features of the US Capitol building on January 21, 2013. I will use that speech as the framework for this essay in the form of a Facebook note to be copied into my blog discussing his second term.

The PRESIDENT of the United States returned to office stood before a crowd one third of the size of the crowd that attended his first inuguration. The day was cold and yet this crowd was among the largest crowds ever to attend an inauguration. Americans were still in uncertain positions in terms of their hour by hour survival in Algeria and three had just died recently. The first Ambassador killed in the line of duty had not yet been fully processed by Congress because his Secretary of State begged off for health reasons. The US had lost its credit rating for a lower rate. Unemployment was high in much of the nation. People wondered what he would address in his address to the nation. How would he react to the right and the far right among his nation’s citizens. Then many others wondered about issues raised during the campaign. The long and oft lauded orator began to speak:

PBHO: “Vice President Biden, Mr. Chief Justice, members of the United States Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow citizens:” There was nothing too radical about these words. He had certainly not declared war on anyone in his homeland so far. Here was a man who had received millions and millions of votes and who lived in the White House. What would he say to our country now?


“Each time we gather to inaugurate a President we bear witness to the enduring strength of our Constitution. We affirm the promise of our democracy. We recall that what binds this nation together is not the colors of our skin or the tenets of our faith or the origins of our names. What makes us exceptional — what makes us American — is our allegiance to an idea articulated in a declaration made more than two centuries ago:

    “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

He set out his usual and basic philiosophy. He set out his same and ordinary and constantly repeated campaign. He may have led some people to confuse the Constitution with the Declaration of Independence but he was not confused himself. He is the Messiah of his own Gospel. That is not as blasphemous as it sounds. Christ was and is a great leader and all leaders are a bit like him. Translating the deeper message Obama says “I am the product of a foreigner a black man who sired me on my white American mother and left this country because he hated it. I am the son of this Afro Communist Muslim who had a very minority name here and would not honor minorities in his land and hated what you believe. But his desire to save his country from foreigners was good and you as native boorn Americans do not have that right. I am the fulfillment and the American truth.” But those are my words not his. His words are almost the same innocuous crap we have all cheered for in the mouths set in friendly white faces many times. I return to his words below. In my Facebook Note his words will be in italics. In the blog they will be lucky to appear at all and this may get very confusing.

PBHO: “Today we continue a never-ending journey to bridge the meaning of those words with the realities of our time. For history tells us that while these truths may be self-evident, they’ve never been self-executing; that while freedom is a gift from God, it must be secured by His people here on Earth. (Applause.) The patriots of 1776 did not fight to replace the tyranny of a king with the privileges of a few or the rule of a mob. They gave to us a republic, a government of, and by, and for the people, entrusting each generation to keep safe our founding creed.

And for more than two hundred years, we have.”

This is both patriotic and fundamentally sound language. It is not universally accepted but it is universally acceptable as an effort to make sense of America. He starts with the Revolution and the War of Independence.

He calls those in that struggle patriots. He addresses faith and religion in a positive and supportive way. The radical potential of previous language is put aside and there is a return to the secure. What is to follow?

PBHO: “Through blood drawn by lash and blood drawn by sword, we learned that no union founded on the principles of liberty and equality could survive half-slave and half-free. We made ourselves anew, and vowed to move forward together.”

Louisiana’s flag bears the motto, “Union, Justice and Confidence” . For this former Confederate State at least it is somewhat true that a vow has been made to move forward together. For the rest it is perhaps a bit of poetic license but it is not far off the mark. For some it is a multiple reminder of the continuing American nightmare. It references the inflamatory words of Lincolns speech where he spoke of blood drawn by the word atoning for blood drawn by the lash. H eclearly accentuates that his is not the same country that went into the War between the States but rather is a new country arising from that event. This is the idea made famous in the DW Griffith film Birth of a Nation which originally was named The Klansman. But now there is the new dimension as it is not a white nationalist but the first Black POTUS speaking about this disjuncture. We honor the revolution but the old order is dead.

PBHO: “Together, we determined that a modern economy requires railroads and highways to speed travel and commerce, schools and colleges to train our workers.

Together, we discovered that a free market only thrives when there are rules to ensure competition and fair play.

Together, we resolved that a great nation must care for the vulnerable, and protect its people from life’s worst hazards and misfortune.

Through it all, we have never relinquished our skepticism of central authority, nor have we succumbed to the fiction that all society’s ills can be cured through government alone. Our celebration of initiative and enterprise, our insistence on hard work and personal responsibility, these are constants in our character.”

So Obama says we have to change with the times and that is a tenet of American Progressivism in some ways at least. However, he ends with a strong paragraph that ought to appease American conservatives. He talks about things we value and care about. He does that in the context of discussing limited government. It is possible to see him pushing out markers for dark changes for the worse in the future but that part of the speech is again a moderate one which is hard to find entirely offensive. However, the President has laid the foundations on which he will build his oratorical edifice.

PBHO: “But we have always understood that when times change, so must we; that fidelity to our founding principles requires new responses to new challenges; that preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action. For the American people can no more meet the demands of today’s world by acting alone than American soldiers could have met the forces of fascism or communism with muskets and militias. No single person can train all the math and science teachers we’ll need to equip our children for the future, or build the roads and networks and research labs that will bring new jobs and businesses to our shores. Now, more than ever, we must do these things together, as one nation and one people.” (Applause.)

There is nothing much worse than the kind of integration Obama stands for and so this is the passage that ties in with the worst side of the coinciding Martin Luther King holiday. Nobody can deny that we must work together and that a great society must have a strong collective dimension. But Obama clearly wants to destroy the “Pluribus” in “E Pluribus Unum”. We cannot afford as individuals or groups much less as a society to do all things together. But Obama’s power base depends on declarations that we always shall. On the other hand Obama is right that we must be joined and interdependent. How that should work out is a different matter. Let us see what the President says next and hereafter.

PBHO: “This generation of Americans has been tested by crises that steeled our resolve and proved our resilience. A decade of war is now ending. (Applause.) An economic recovery has begun. (Applause.) America’s possibilities are limitless, for we possess all the qualities that this world without boundaries demands: youth and drive; diversity and openness; an endless capacity for risk and a gift for reinvention. My fellow Americans, we are made for this moment, and we will seize it — so long as we seize it together.” (Applause.)

A world without boundaries. A world where he will not defend our borders, a world where he will not allow the good and honest and hardworking are the white or the rich to defend what might be considered to be theirs from total dissolution into the pool of the kind of mass society he is creating from its long-existing constituent parts. This is not a particulary young country but he will remake it and throw it open. Like Lincoln who in 1838 said he would make his mark ifhe had to free every slave and enslave every free man this former Senator from Illinois is determined to make a change and a set of marks on the country. For many of us America is already very badly out of control but we are nowhere compared to where he wants us to go. Let us examine where that journey will take us…

PBHO: ” For we, the people, understand that our country cannot succeed when a shrinking few do very well and a growing many barely make it. (Applause.) We believe that America’s prosperity must rest upon the broad shoulders of a rising middle class. We know that America thrives when every person can find independence and pride in their work; when the wages of honest labor liberate families from the brink of hardship. We are true to our creed when a little girl born into the bleakest poverty knows that she has the same chance to succeed as anybody else, because she is an American; she is free, and she is equal, not just in the eyes of God but also in our own. (Applause.)

We understand that outworn programs are inadequate to the needs of our time. So we must harness new ideas and technology to remake our government, revamp our tax code, reform our schools, and empower our citizens with the skills they need to work harder, learn more, reach higher. But while the means will change, our purpose endures: a nation that rewards the effort and determination of every single American. That is what this moment requires. That is what will give real meaning to our creed.”

Some Americans surely are determined and make an effort to cheat, steal, murder and destroy the property of the State the union and other citizens. Obama must know that there are people of bad will here even if he is not such a person himself. So if he rewards there effort and determination as well as the efforts of the majority who work hard he will be dooming us all the more. But perhaps this is not the America ofour purpose that nation I suppose would not include people of bad will. How would they be gotten rid of, I wonder that – is it just a good sound?

The man who could not call this the United States in his oath but only “the United” wants to remake our government. With malice and hypocrisy toward many as Lincoln had in his heart. There has never been a President like Obama. Indeed there have been few leaders in history that can be compared to him. He knows it and so do I. My whole life I have found things bad here but we are heading towards a new level of badness and he has the vision to set out the road map. The cost of having the very poorest have the same chance as the most privileged is the cost of of social transformation and leveling which can be survived in some polities but probably not in a diverse super society like this. In a concentration camp, a massacre, a great natural disaster that kind of equality largely exists. It is good to want to help the less fortunate but to make them the most frtunate’s equals is to declare very clearly the intended destruction of society. Some ladders and safety nets are possible and imperative but complete leveling is usually near anihilation. But if the pattern holds the next paragraph will lead us back towrd the middle. Does it?

PBHO: ” We, the people, still believe that every citizen deserves a basic measure of security and dignity. We must make the hard choices to reduce the cost of health care and the size of our deficit. But we reject the belief that America must choose between caring for the generation that built this country and investing in the generation that will build its future. (Applause.) For we remember the lessons of our past, when twilight years were spent in poverty and parents of a child with a disability had nowhere to turn.

We do not believe that in this country freedom is reserved for the lucky, or happiness for the few. We recognize that no matter how responsibly we live our lives, any one of us at any time may face a job loss, or a sudden illness, or a home swept away in a terrible storm. The commitments we make to each other through Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security, these things do not sap our initiative, they strengthen us. (Applause.) They do not make us a nation of takers; they free us to take the risks that make this country great. (Applause.)”

This passage in the speech is the healthy part of Liberalism. It is the part you can go to as context to dismiss what he just said about complete leveling. One can quibble over the exact language he uses. One can argue about where we find the resouces and what justice is possible in the real world. Nonetheless, in something like my own model constitutions and in other responsible efforts from the far right these goals and their socialist associations can still have a place. Once again one tends to dismiss the radical remarks in this wave of moderation.

PBHO: “We, the people, still believe that our obligations as Americans are not just to ourselves, but to all posterity. We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations. (Applause.) Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires and crippling drought and more powerful storms.

The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult. But America cannot resist this transition, we must lead it. We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries, we must claim its promise. That’s how we will maintain our economic vitality and our national treasure — our forests and waterways, our crop lands and snow-capped peaks. That is how we will preserve our planet, commanded to our care by God. That’s what will lend meaning to the creed our fathers once declared.”

The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult he says. The struggle for a better future is put in mostly glowing terms but here we are brought to face the bitterest of realities. The girl who is the poorest cannot scale down her expectations and live for her family’s future in part but here we must take a bitter pill. The military picture he is about to project is too optimistic by half but here we must face the cruelty of reality. I agree with the words of Obama that indicate we should invest in alternative enrgy and the government has a role there. I agree that we must find a path to a more environmentally sensible America. But I do not trust him to deliver it because I think he is committed to weakening and breaking this country. I would recommend a path with many bitter pills and trying passages. I would not single out the energy sector in this way. He is the demolition President and this is part of his plan to unmake us.

PBHO:”We, the people, still believe that enduring security and lasting peace do not require perpetual war. (Applause.) Our brave men and women in uniform, tempered by the flames of battle, are unmatched in skill and courage. (Applause.) Our citizens, seared by the memory of those we have lost, know too well the price that is paid for liberty. The knowledge of their sacrifice will keep us forever vigilant against those who would do us harm. But we are also heirs to those who won the peace and not just the war; who turned sworn enemies into the surest of friends — and we must carry those lessons into this time as well.”

Always in America it must be hyperbole. It is not in our culture to say for example that our troops erve with great skill and great courage. Instead we must say they are unmatched in skill and courage. This only becomes a big deal because it is so endlessly repeated at almost every level almost every day. It certainly does not help build thpeaceful world Obama claims we are so good at building.

The President also claims that we can take perpetual vigilance for granted. In considering that while Clinton speaks to the Congress about Benghazi I am drawn to the questions Senator John McCain has submitted regarding this incident.

SJM:

    “On the anniversary of the worst terrorist attack in American history, after multiple attacks this year on U.S. and Western interests in Libya, and with rising insecurity in countries across the Middle East, why were U.S. military units and assets in the region not ready, alert, and positioned to respond in a timely fashion to what should have been a foreseeable emergency?

    ■· Why were the testimonies of the U.S. personnel who were evacuated from Benghazi on September 12 – eyewitnesses who knew there never was a demonstration outside the Consulate – not shared in a timely way with, and immediately factored in to the judgments of, our intelligence community?”

    ■· Does this failure reflect obstacles that still exist to the free sharing of information across executive branch agencies, which was a key concern of the 9/11 Commission?
    I have to wonder if we are really that vigilant as a nation and society. The troubles abraod seem to be multiplying and I am not sure how many surest of friends there are in the world inhabited by real heads of state.

PBHO:”We will defend our people and uphold our values through strength of arms and rule of law. We will show the courage to try and resolve our differences with other nations peacefully –- not because we are naïve about the dangers we face, but because engagement can more durably lift suspicion and fear. (Applause.)

America will remain the anchor of strong alliances in every corner of the globe. And we will renew those institutions that extend our capacity to manage crisis abroad, for no one has a greater stake in a peaceful world than its most powerful nation. We will support democracy from Asia to Africa, from the Americas to the Middle East, because our interests and our conscience compel us to act on behalf of those who long for freedom. And we must be a source of hope to the poor, the sick, the marginalized, the victims of prejudice –- not out of mere charity, but because peace in our time requires the constant advance of those principles that our common creed describes: tolerance and opportunity, human dignity and justice.”

I think the Peace Corps is a good thing. I believe the State Department should support and fund more outreach programs. I think America should shelter some refugees and support some rebels against the world’s worst governments. But some people surely are prosperous and lead because they are better than the poor and the led. At least Obama clearly thinks he is such a leader. But he wants America universally on the side of the underdog because he wants America brought under. The vision he spells out is catastrophically expensive and cannot be sustained completely without wrecking any budget much less a troubled one or an unbudgeted mess like ours. This is more like the Soviet Union’s Comintern than it is the moderate secular missionary liberalism of the earlier Kennedy clan and others. We have more of this expansion of universalism in his next passage on liberty.

PBHO:”We, the people, declare today that the most evident of truths –- that all of us are created equal –- is the star that guides us still; just as it guided our forebears through Seneca Falls, and Selma, and Stonewall; just as it guided all those men and women, sung and unsung, who left footprints along this great Mall, to hear a preacher say that we cannot walk alone; to hear a King proclaim that our individual freedom is inextricably bound to the freedom of every soul on Earth. (Applause.)

It is now our generation’s task to carry on what those pioneers began. For our journey is not complete until our wives, our mothers and daughters can earn a living equal to their efforts. (Applause.) Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law –- (applause) — for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well. (Applause.) Our journey is not complete until no citizen is forced to wait for hours to exercise the right to vote. (Applause.) Our journey is not complete until we find a better way to welcome the striving, hopeful immigrants who still see America as a land of opportunity — (applause) — until bright young students and engineers are enlisted in our workforce rather than expelled from our country. (Applause.) Our journey is not complete until all our children, from the streets of Detroit to the hills of Appalachia, to the quiet lanes of Newtown, know that they are cared for and cherished and always safe from harm.”

In my own model Constitutions I have laid oput visions of the future and the present which recognize the needs of imigrants, homosexuals, Blacks and others for dignity and autonomy. I have also recognized the neeed to deal with gun violence. But Obama wants to disarm Joe Six Pack, destroy what is left of our family structure and throw our land open to endless demographic invasion. He wants to commit us to an unsustainable and unsurvivable path. He wants an America where Citizenship is presumed if you happen to be around. This is not about what can be done to create a liberal paradise this is about the anihilation that comes from the cost of seeking to build a liberal paradise. Doing it all as anyone would like without paying for it is the future for a little while. Then collapse will surely come.

PBHO: “That is our generation’s task — to make these words, these rights, these values of life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness real for every American. Being true to our founding documents does not require us to agree on every contour of life. It does not mean we all define liberty in exactly the same way or follow the same precise path to happiness. Progress does not compel us to settle centuries-long debates about the role of government for all time, but it does require us to act in our time. (Applause.)

For now decisions are upon us and we cannot afford delay. We cannot mistake absolutism for principle, or substitute spectacle for politics, or treat name-calling as reasoned debate. (Applause.) We must act, knowing that our work will be imperfect. We must act, knowing that today’s victories will be only partial and that it will be up to those who stand here in four years and 40 years and 400 years hence to advance the timeless spirit once conferred to us in a spare Philadelphia hall.”

Do we really believe he wants a federal solution to anything? Do we really forget how long and detailed the Affordable Healthcare Act is and how it was passed. He is a lying hypocrite who wants others to abstain from criticizing him. The reliable message is that we need haste. The revolution must proceed while there is enoughmomentum to make it succeed. The rest of the speech will remind us of the country where all this is happening. the end will set out the journey we are starting anew.

PBHO:”My fellow Americans, the oath I have sworn before you today, like the one recited by others who serve in this Capitol, was an oath to God and country, not party or faction. And we must faithfully execute that pledge during the duration of our service. But the words I spoke today are not so different from the oath that is taken each time a soldier signs up for duty or an immigrant realizes her dream. My oath is not so different from the pledge we all make to the flag that waves above and that fills our hearts with pride.

They are the words of citizens and they represent our greatest hope. You and I, as citizens, have the power to set this country’s course. You and I, as citizens, have the obligation to shape the debates of our time — not only with the votes we cast, but with the voices we lift in defense of our most ancient values and enduring ideals. (Applause.)

Let us, each of us, now embrace with solemn duty and awesome joy what is our lasting birthright. With common effort and common purpose, with passion and dedication, let us answer the call of history and carry into an uncertain future that precious light of freedom.

Thank you. God bless you, and may He forever bless these United States of America. (Applause.) ”

In this speech unlike the oath he gets States into the air. This is the last vestige of the old America. He honors God and asks his blessing on us as a country. He is the President of the United States of America. There will be plenty of passion.

The words attributed to President Barack Hussein Obama are from the White House Website and are part of the public record. I received no permission beyond that of the First Ammendment. He is indeed our Head of State. We are indeed at the start of his term. This will be his time to make a difference.

.

Inauguration Day as Required by the Constitution: A Facebook Note

by Frank Wynerth Summers III on Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 10:09pm ·
Barack Hussein Obama is to start his second term at about the time that I will be arriving for Brunch at the home on the banks of the Bayou Vermilion where a family is hosting my cousin and her newly betrothed for a brunch. All around the country people will be giving birth, being born, dying, going to houses of worship and going out to eat among other things. Millions will be getting ready to watch football with a few friends or family members. I am hoping that my manner of dress will be sufficiently and not excessively “country club casual”. I really do wish the couple well. I also have worries not everyone brings to a party of this kind when they attend. My life has left me with a little bit of what some people might call PTSD but is not reallly serious enough to be a disorder. Within the spectrum ofrisk awareness I am simply at the high end and when there are not so many factors known as unkown it is easy to worry even about security.

But while all sorts of things are on my mind I am also aware of the troubles of the country and the difficulty of addressing them. I am further aware that the USA is addressing its own set of serious crises. The countries own parties this week will celebrate the vision and hopes of one man and the team he has gathered. They will celbrate that he has been returned to office. I may have fewer enemies or more enemies thatn President Obama. I may live to see many more presidents of these United States or none at all. But President Obama will face many challenges as will all Americans in the coming years. Perhaps things will turn out very well and perhaps they will not.

Unlike my own worries, which are often tenuously connected to me but extend to people far and near who are in real danger, the worries of a President are largely structural and known I would suppose. There are so many ties between him and all those he needs to worry about or chooses to worry about. The party planners, hosts and guests in Washington are able to connect the man to a wide range of policy questions and issues very directly.

However, for me and others at more personal parties our problems risks and connections are less openly public and national. I have written here and elsewhere about the troubles I have seen. Many of those I hope the happy couple will be spared. I also hope for a better occasion on which the party will occur than the most tragic days of my life. But the party will not be world-wide news. With hostages possibly, or possibly not still in Algeria or Mali there is another factor to complicate inaugural security. However, the President has a large team to engage any perceived threat. However, those of us at smaller parties will not have large protective details. Does the inuguration matter to all of us at our varied parties?

I think it can matter and I God grants me chance I will watch all or most of Monday’s proceedings. I have not been a fan of the President and I have never voted for him. But amid my many criticisms of the man, his policies and flaws in our system I have also written about some good and agreeable qualities of Obama and his team. It seems to me the President will matter to the betrothed couple and to many others. Whether his presidency will matter much to me is harder to say. We are close in age and both have had some experiences which are both rare and similar. What will happen to either or both of us is hard for me to say. Perhaps it is impossible to say.

I do not even know all that will happen tomorrow. I am going to a nearby place to which I have never before traveled. I may be posting my last note before Monday’s big inaugural affairs. Like many American my attention is divided. But the President will matter. It is not possible to say how much he will matter but he will shape the future. Many Americans will be celebrating the future and I am also celebrating a new future. The future of a newly engaged couple is what I am celebrating mostly. Will there future be a good one? I hope so…

As I type this I am preparing to go to what may be a small or larger brunch to honor a cousin’s betrothal. I have just sealed up a gift for the occasion. These will be the last few hours of President Barack Hussein Obama’s first term legally. However, the public inauguration will not be until Monday. Monday is Martin Luther King Day. He drew huge crownds to many places including the Mall that will be used Monday. Obama is to use his bible in one of the ceremonies. I will be far from the hundreds of thousands gathering in DC. I will be with a smaller group the whole time.

I spend more time online than in large groups these days. My access to the internet is not that secure. But I trust that these virtual crowds are not like Manti Te’o’s girlfriend. I trust that his principal remaining tie to the world for me is mostly authentic. It usually seems to check out. It is easier todeal with than thousnads on the Mall would be probably. My uneasiness about crowds, groups and gatherings increases a great deal over time and more than a little bit from day to day. I have no regular job, occupational license or mortgage. I no longer own real estate and I have not even had a compensated by-line in several years now. Those factors of isolation combine with the many troubles and problems I have seen in the world to remind me of all the risks that I must face in the world. I can hope for something good to happen for myself and those around me and still be aware That I have a darkening view of the world. Yet I am drawn to try to honor a couple’s brightest hopes. Perhaps many are doing that this week in Washington. I do not know what the scene really is there. I know less and less of the scene around me…

Guns, Violence and Policy in the USA and Abroad: A recopied Facebook Note

by Frank Wynerth Summers III on Thursday, January 17, 2013 at 11:19am ·
President Barack Hussein Obama has come out with his gun policy intiatives. There is no doubt that former US Representative Gabby Giffords, Vice President Joe Biden, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg will find many opportunites to say, write aand support a wide variety of people who will discuss the future of the country and the role guns will play in that future. There will be many experts discussing the current situation. This has been a time with many high profile shootings since President Obama came into office and there were already many high profile shootings.

I have written of gun policy before. I would support a regime that allowed federal licensing of transport of guns acorss State and other jurisdictional lines except by licensed wholesalers. Any retail or personal transit would require a not too expepensive federal license and be recorded. Jurisdictions could then also make rules for themselves. Beyond that I have proposed a whole new constitution. Howver, I will leave aside my own radical vision for now and eal with what we have. Some states may fortify schools, some have extensive gun control. The feds could tax all guns and ammo with a single 10% value added addition to all other taxes and prices. Half of this woulod go to the records and policing of the new law by the ATF. The rest would go to the general treasury. I think the national registry of not nice people is a really horrible idea. It is both eveil and idiotic. those are its good points.

This is a time when many Americans are concerned about the killing of Americans with handguns. I feel that I must weigh in on the issues related to handguns, AR-15 rifles and the numbers involved in killings in this country. I also feel that I must weigh in on policy concerns. America is certainly a nation with many firearms. Their is little more to it than that which almost all Americans will agree about. We do not agree about how many guns there ought to be or anything else along those lines.

The truth is that the President of the United States has ties to people in the Weather Underground, has supported the Occupy Wall Street and the larger Occupy Movement and has been silent about the role of the Black Block Anarachists and others in this whole world of people who make trouble for a living when there is such work to be had. I respect more people in that world than perhaps many people in my readership do. It has been years since I had any real prospertity or a mortgage, I know lots of people who have been bankrupt, in jail or otherwise in trouble. I kinow some really wretched people who live in nice homes and have many financial assets and in many cases they know I despise them. But it is this vast mob which has so much increasing influnce under President Obama who are most deterred by guns. They will be free to remake the country into their own image when the guns are more limited and be much more bold in undertaking that national transformation.

Popular questions in the media and the public today are focused on how to stop people shooting up schools. There are few wondering how to stop the destruction of a society in which schools are possibly worth attending. I think things are pretty horrible already but they certainly can and likely will get worse.

“Why Do Riots Occur?” may be a hard question. But there is no doubt that a heavily armed populace is a deterrent to the pursuit of mob rule across a society.

Remember what happened after the Rodney King beating? That did not spread far beyond the neighborhoods in South Central Los Angels in large part because large numbers of people in the frenzied mobs were aware that other people with different points of view were well armed at home. The plague of angry idiocy which has been the downfall of many civilizations was contained then and has often been contained thus. Britain has countless more cultural resources to deter riots than we have relative to the threat. However since disarming the populace the role of riots has greatly increased. That violent riots are part of the discourse in Britain is evident when one discusses the 2011 United Kingdom anti-austerity protests which connected with the sometimes violent student protests of November and December 2010, and was prompted by cuts and changes to the welfare like and unsustainable realtively new system funding various forms of higher and further education in England. Significant in the UK was that a student protest included a violent protest when students attacked the automobile in which Charles, Prince of Wales and his wife Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall were riding. This is a symbolic attack equal to only a handful of possible symbolic acts in the United States.

But overall these anti-austerity protests were nothing compared to the 2011 England Riots proper. Are any Americans remembering images of England’s firefighters blasting water hoses on a shop and flats destroyed by arson during the initial rioting in Tottenham?

Across large parts of London from the 6th to 10th of August 2011 as well as in Birmingham, the West Midlands, Merseyside, Greater Manchester, Bristol and elsewhere there was a wave and network of rioting, looting, arson, mugging, assault, and murder. The numbers killed were fewer than in one mass shooting but the effect on life and culture and the message to those in society was very strong. After such events it hard to trust other reports because people do not report violence. Code fo this problem in the UK is that anti-social events occurred under Blair but crime went down. That simply means that the honest live in perpetuial terror. Low-grade and limited terror but terror nonethless.

Those who want only the Police to be armed would do well to remember that the British disturbances I am discussing here began on August 6, 2011 after a protest in Tottenham, following the death of Mark Duggan, a local man who was shot and killed by police on 4 August 2011. The protestors became angry after police attacked a sixteen-year old who provoked them. Several violent clashes with police, along with the destruction of police vehicles, magistrates’ court and a double-decker bus. The complete loss of many and severe damage to more civilian homes and businesses occupied by the disarmed British citizen-subjects of this era was likely nothing compared to what will happen here. This is completely forgotten now though it did get some attention from the media then . Before the wave of unrest ended a very conservative estimate of £200 million worth of property damage was incurred, and local economic activity was significantly compromised. The riots have occasioned debate among Brits of varied political, social and academic backgrounds regarding the causes and context in which they happened but have not brought back the hidden and polite British guns society which prevented total social upheaval of this kind. Well spoken people discuss the rioters’ behavior in terms of structural factors such as racism, classism, and economic decline, as well as cultural factors like criminality, hooliganism, breakdown of social morality, and gang culture. The absences of a gun-toting law abiding element is not discussed. The struggle is over and the future is determined. President Obama cannot get the country he wants with guns allowed to those depressed and not always able to keep the rules in a society sunk under rules. Most of those rules are badly thought out, badly written and ill-advised. The nannie-staters, the thugs and the cowards will have their unholy alliance to run our country. The honest tough, the mildy misanthropic and the law-abiding who deals openly with imperfection will become a legal underclass. None of us will survive this as a culture but we will be individually dead (most of us of old age or other such causes) before the final transformation occurs.